38th “American View” Examines Alito’s Bad Record On: Infanticide, Abortion, Un-Persons, “Griswold,”

The American View ^ | John Lofton

[The_Eaglet]

Our 38th nationally-syndicated, one-hour radio show, “The American View” examines in detail Judge Samuel Alito’s bad record on: Infanticide, abortion, un-persons, “Griswold,” “Lemon Test,” and a student sex survey you probably never heard about. Judge Alito’s confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee are scheduled to begin January 9.

38: Hear it now

[The_Eaglet]

This is an informative program evaluating Samuel Alito's decisions and statements regarding abortion and socialized abortion.

[Red Badger]

....These Griswolds?.........

[frogjerk]

What do they mean "Bad" record?

[The_Eaglet]

If you listen, Lofton cites examples where Alito voted down partial-birth abortion bans and restrictions on government funding of abortion.

[frogjerk]

If you listen, Lofton cites examples where Alito voted down partial-birth abortion bans and restrictions on government funding of abortion.

I can't listen right now, do you have any links to sources about this info?

[linda_22003]

No... the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut in 1965..... not Clark. :)

[Red Badger]

????.....

[linda_22003]

The question was, "which Griswold".

[The_Eaglet]

Alito Supported Abortion In Three Cases.

Also see Alito Record Proves He is Not Pro-Life, Supported Roe v. Wade, Should Not Be Confirmed for more links.

[Red Badger]

OH!.....Okay!........I thought you were posting to someone else, and pinged me by mistake...........gotcha!......

[JuneNY]

I listened to the broadcast, and I was stunned at what some of those "conservatives" had to say about Alito. How is it that people can be so deceived? Could it be that some people are just plain blinded by allegiance to the Republican party?

[The_Eaglet]

Ruling in favor of abortion and government funding liberal in both the social and the fiscal categories.

[linda_22003]

Let me get this straight... Republicans have been defending Alito from Democrat attacks and now some Republicans have taken over attacking him? Just trying to keep up, here.

[frogjerk]

Let me get this straight... Republicans have been defending Alito from Democrat attacks and now some Republicans have taken over attacking him? Just trying to keep up, here.

These objections are coming from the Constitution party, not Republicans...

[MNJohnnie]

"No... the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut in 1965..... not Clark."

Ah so it is a disinformation campaign by the usual in the Closet Leftists?

[MNJohnnie]

Just the usual disinformation campaign by the in the closet Leftists from the "Consitutionalist" Party.

[linda_22003]

I'm not sure what you mean by that. Are you familiar with Griswold v. Connecticut [381 US 479 (1965)]? That's what is being referred to here.

[MNJohnnie]

Because the "Recovering Republican" invertible turns out to be a closet Leftist who attend the MOveon.org seminar where they were instructed to log onto Conservative websites and spread lies about Republicans concerning fiscal and abortion issues. So which one did you tow attend? The one hosted by Mobey or the one hosted by Mike Moore?

[The_Eaglet]

Because the "Recovering Republican" invertible turns out to be a closet Leftist who attend the MOveon.org seminar where they were instructed to log onto Conservative websites and spread lies about Republicans concerning fiscal and abortion issues. So which one did you tow attend? The one hosted by Mobey or the one hosted by Mike Moore?

I don't know enough about MoveON.org to say. I only see truth about Republicans here. Can you identify any lies rather than just make assertions without any evidence to back up your claims? Which one did you attend?

[frogjerk]

I read the article on the site you linked to regarding the New Jersey wrongful death suit ruling and Alito.

http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=474&AMVIEWUSER=8b322f7c746d9166880e15657371c80a

This is truly a confusing and technical case but I don't like the way that the site is twisting the argument into a pro-life argument against Alito. It seems very weak at best. Alito as an Appeals judge (not on SCOTUS) was following the legal precedent. On SCOTUS Alito would be in the best position to object to Roe v. Wade.

Also, in the article I read it is very disingenuous to put quotes in paragraphs to make is appear as if Alito said all of the the things in the article. It seems to me that only one quote is definitively attributable to Alito. And even then he is showing some reservation with agreeing 100% with the majority opinion.

Now that I have read this one article carefully I am skeptical as to the other claims being made on this site that you linked to...