Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Corporate Curtain
CWA ^ | 12.29.05 | Robert H. Knight

Posted on 01/05/2006 7:07:03 PM PST by Coleus

America's corporations are under increasing pressure not only to accommodate homosexuality but to celebrate it and to punish employees who object.

Over the past two decades, hundreds of companies have adopted varying degrees of homosexual activism in their official policies. As a result, a growing number of Christians have been disciplined or fired for resisting the trend.

Elizabeth Birch, former president of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the largest homosexual pressure group, said in 2004 that she was happily surprised that corporations have become "the driving engine" of "gay" activism.1

The HRC Web site's National Corporate Sponsors page has this introduction:

The support from corporate America to the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community is directly tied to HRC's overall success.2 Please show your loyalty and support by directing your friends/family to our National Corporate Sponsors, listed below.3

The list includes: Volvo, IBM, Citigroup, Chase Home Finance, Prudential Financial, Mitchell Gold and Bob Williams Furniture, Olivia travel, Hotels.com, American Airlines, Washington Mutual, Showtime, Advocate and Out magazines, Canada Tourism Commission, Nike, Deloitte tax consultants, Replacements, Ltd. ("one of the largest private gay-owned companies in America") and Shell Oil.4

Other companies that consistently promote the homosexual agenda, including "gay"-themed ads and/or support for "gay" political-pressure groups, include Kodak, Subaru, Saab, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, the Hartford Insurance Company, Starbucks, Avis, Ben & Jerry's, virtually every motion picture company, including the Walt Disney Company and Paramount, beer companies Budweiser, Miller, Coors and Molson, and many liquor companies such as Absolut Vodka and Seagram's.

Since 2002, HRC has published a Corporate Equity Index, rating companies on their pro-homosexual polices.5 In 2005, with 750 companies surveyed, the number of companies scoring a perfect 100 rose from 56 in 2004 to 101 in 2005, an 80-percent gain. It's important to keep in mind that, although many of these companies are in the Fortune 500, America has more than 5 million companies, most of which do not have pro-homosexual policies.

A few years ago, Cracker Barrel, the Tennessee-based family restaurant chain, surprised observers by adding "sexual orientation" to its employee code as it expanded into the liberal Northeast. But it still earns low marks on the Equity Index, scoring only 29.

A few surprise additions to the 100-rating club are General Mills cereals, Sears, PepsiCo, Walgreen's, Toyota and Kraft Foods. In fact, Kraft has gone as far as donating $25,000 to the "Gay Games," an Olympic-like athletics competition slated for July 2006 in Chicago.6

According to the HRC report, "[T]he most significant policy gain in 2005 was the addition of 'gender identity or expression' in corporate non-discrimination policies."7 This means companies are putting cross-dressing, transgenderism and transsexualism on the same level as race and ethnicity. HRC is going a step further, however, and has announced that companies can earn points in 2006 by paying for sex-change-related operations and hormone injections.8

A Revolution Within

The corporate embrace of homosexual activism has come with breathtaking speed.

Alan Sears and Craig Osten, authors of The Homosexual Agenda, write:

Why has corporate America been such an easy target for homosexual activists to push their agenda? One of the main reasons is that the homosexual community has a much higher level of disposable income than most families, and therefore in order to tap that market, many corporations have gone overboard in their willingness to bow to the demands of radical homosexual activists. In addition, homosexual activists, with the aid of the media, have become so adept at demonizing any corporation that does not give in to their agenda that most companies quietly cower at their feet rather than face the public relations wrath of the activists.9

Homosexual activists who target companies follow a series of steps, increasing their demands. They press for:

  1. Official recognition of a homosexual employees group.

  2. Adding "sexual orientation" to the company's nondiscrimination code.

  3. Including "sexual orientation" in diversity workshops and materials.

  4. Inviting homosexual speakers who liken "sexual orientation" to race and ethnicity, and disparage traditional morality as a form of bigotry.

  5. Creating health and other traditional spousal benefits for domestic partners.

  6. Displaying "gay"-friendly indicators, such as upside-down pink triangles in cubicles and offices that indicate a "safe" space for homosexuals.

  7. Recognizing homosexual partners in a fashion identical to married partners, including equal access at company picnics and fitness centers.

  8. Creation of "gay pride" days and weeks, with company support.

  9. Company floats with corporate logos in "gay pride" parades.

  10. Company funding of outside homosexual activist groups, such as the Human Rights Campaign, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.

  11. Ending the practice in the office of referring to one's spouse as husband or wife in favor of more "inclusive" terms such as partner or significant other.

  12. Having company employees press lawmakers for "gay rights" laws, such as the proposed federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act or federal "hate crime" laws.

  13. Punishing employees who object to open displays of homosexuality, such as two women kissing in front of other employees, or the company's support for homosexual activism.

Paying the Price for Not Bowing Down to the Idol of 'Diversity'

Here are a few examples of how corporate homosexual activism affects employees:

Conclusion

Many of the largest corporations in America have bought into the homosexual agenda and are helping to fashion a future in which Christian, orthodox Jewish and other employees who hold traditional beliefs will face discipline, loss of promotions and even get fired for their beliefs. It's also a future in which Christian-owned companies will lose contracts and face discrimination lawsuits if they act to uphold Christian morality. In California, under a state law, companies that do business with the state government must subsidize homosexual relationships, regardless of the beliefs of the company owners.

In the name of "diversity," America is becoming a place in which Christians will find themselves on the wrong side of corporate policies if they cling to their belief that marriage requires one man and one woman, and that homosexuality is outside God's plan for healthy living.

Corporate "gay" activism is a Trojan horse for the larger social agenda of destroying America's Judeo-Christian-based foundation and replacing it with an anything-goes, hedonistic society hostile to Biblical morality.

Americans should decline to support companies that are helping to create this dangerous system, and should work to roll back these ill-advised policies.

Robert Knight is director of the Culture & Family Institute, an affiliate of Concerned Women for America (CWA). Lindsey Douthit, a Baylor University graduate and 2005 CWA intern, assisted with this report.


End Notes

  1. Elizabeth Birch, remarks during a debate with Robert Knight at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro, April 7, 2005.

  2. http://www.hrc.org/Content/NavigationMenu/HRC/Get_Involved/HRC_Sponsors/Corporate_Sponsors/

    National_Corporate_Sponsors.htm.

  3. Ibid.

  4. Ibid.

  5. http://hrc.org/Template.cfm?Section=About_HRC&Template=/ContentManagement/

    ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=28841.

  6. Peter LaBarbera, "Crain's Chicago Business on Kraft, Harris Bank Sponsoring 'Gay Games,'" Illinois Family Institute, May 22, 2005, at http://www.illinoisfamily.org/informed/contentview.asp?c=25688.

  7. Ibid., p. 6.

  8. Ibid., p. 13.

  9. Alan Sears and Craig Osten, The Homosexual Agenda: Exposing the Principal Threat to Religious Freedom Today, (Nashville, Tennessee: Broadman & Holman, 2003), pp. 156-157.

  10. J. Matt Barber, "Intolerance Will Not Be Tolerated: The Gay Agenda vs. Family Values," The Conservative Voice Web site at http://www.theconservativevoice.com/articles/article.html?storyid=1484.

  11. "All Fired-Up Over Essay: Lawsuit Filed Against Allstate After Words Cost Employee His Job," Chicago Tribune, Redeye Edition on Nexis-Lexis, p. 6.

  12. Ron Strom, "Allstate Terminates Manager Over Homosexuality Column," WorldNetDaily, June 24, 2005, at http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44961, and telephone interview with J. Matt Barber by Robert Knight on November 16, 2005.

  13. Telephone interview with J. Matt Barber, ibid.

  14. "Anti-Gay Postings at Work Not Protected," Workforce Management, Crain Communications Inc., March 1, 2004.

  15. "Worker Sues California Department Over Cubicle Censorship," The Associated Press State and Local Wire, August 23, 2004.

  16. Janet Folger, The Criminalization of Christianity, (Sisters, Oregon: Multnomah Publishers, 2005), p. 10.

  17. Robert Knight and Ken Ervin, The Other Side of Tolerance: Victims of Homosexual Activism, Family Research Council, BL020, 1996, p. 8.

  18. "Do not be deceived. God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap." (NKJV)

  19. "And if it seems evil to you to serve the LORD, choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD." (NKJV)

  20. Phone Interview with Michael Hartman by CWA intern Lindsey Douthit, July 29, 2005.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antichristianbias; business; corporateamerica; corporations; cwa; gaystapo; homos; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; workplace

1 posted on 01/05/2006 7:07:04 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Sad. I think it is more about pressure than it is about money. All the gays I've ever met were dirt poor.


2 posted on 01/05/2006 7:15:49 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

What this doesn't mention is that these corporations also seek to impose the same standards on their vendors and service-providers.

My law firm used to provide legal services for a large national bank that did business in our state. We got a questionnaire from the bank asking us to say how many of our attorneys were minorities, women, and lesbian and gay.

We actually do quite well on the women and minorities, but we refused to answer the questions on gays and lesbians, saying that we thought that was a private matter into which we do not inquire (which is true)or keep any records (and we do in fact have gay and lesbian attorneys). We were then stricken from the Bank's list of approved law firms.


3 posted on 01/05/2006 7:17:02 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Thanks for the post. A most disturbing read.

One wonders who will be left to pick up the pieces?


4 posted on 01/05/2006 7:19:54 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"Observe Gay Pride or Else"

It's ironic - no it's hypocritical - that the Red Cross would force a homosexual agenda on it's employees.

Yet, when a homosexual wishes to donate blood, the the Red Cross DENIES (naturally, the right thing to do) that blood, due to the fact the giver engages in dangerous conduct that places that blood at high risk.

5 posted on 01/05/2006 7:26:06 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Communist Goals (1963) as given IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - 26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
6 posted on 01/05/2006 7:35:44 PM PST by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
7 posted on 01/05/2006 7:48:01 PM PST by bulldozer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Thus Gramsci's "long march through the institutions" continues on. What's even more amazing are scores of useful idiots in conservative ranks who unfailingly stand behind the CEOs and other corporatist commissars who actively promote such cultural Marxism.

Guess what, El Rushbo, Hannity, and followers? The Bill Gateses, Sumner Redstones, and Ted Turners of this world, along with all of their adoring sycophants, have thoroughly bought into the entire one-world leftist-PC agenda and are busily shoving it down everyone's throat. These folks are so utterly treasonous and disgusting that I'm starting to think that Muslims might actually be preferable.


8 posted on 01/05/2006 8:25:30 PM PST by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Forcing a person for accepting that which he rejects is violence. We all know that homosexuality is an arrested development. To get fired for saying so is humiating and confusing.


9 posted on 01/05/2006 8:56:50 PM PST by Falconspeed (Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others. Robert Louis Stevenson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

It's worse than I thought.


10 posted on 01/05/2006 9:39:57 PM PST by Coleus (IMHO, The IVF procedure is immoral & kills many embryos/children and should be outlawed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Gack. Read/pingout tomorrow.


11 posted on 01/05/2006 10:19:11 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

The only value corporate America understands is the value of money. There is absolutely nothing else, be it country society, or family. This is more true today than ever before and it will become even more true in the future.


12 posted on 04/10/2006 10:33:20 PM PDT by rimmont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
The corporates only care about their vanities and promotions of anti-family social movements. They waste huge sums of money while doing so, because there's not enough competition. They're third and fourth generation spoiled brats.

http://www.umich.edu/~urel/admissions/legal/gru_amicus/32_internatl.pdf

The following filed briefs in favor of "affirmative action" in the Michigan "Grutter v. Bollinger" (Michigan University) case. No one is pushing the corporations to do it. They started it, and they pay their own revenues to continue it.

American Bar Association

American Council on Education, et. al.

Civil Rights Project of Harvard University

Clinical Legal Education Association

Fortune 500 Corporations that filed briefs in favor of "affirmative action" for Michigan University

3M
Abbott Laboratories
American Airlines
Ashland
Bank One
Boeing
Coca-Cola
Dow Chemical
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours
Eastman Kodak
Eli Lilly
Ernst & Young
Exelon
Fannie Mae
General Dynamics
General Mills
Intel
Johnson & Johnson
Kellogg
KPMG
Lucent Technologies
Microsoft
Mitsubishi
Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Nationwide Financial
Pfizer
PPG
Proctor & Gamble
Sara Lee
Steelcase
Texaco
TRW
United Airlines

General Motors Corporation

Law Deans of Columbia, Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, New York and Yale University, and University of Pennsylvania

Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under Law

Michigan Attorney General

Michigan Public Officials

National Asian Pacific American Bar Association, et. al.

NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund

Ohio State University

Thirty-six Faculty Members of The Ohio State University College of Law

UAW (International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers
13 posted on 04/11/2006 12:08:41 AM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bulldozer
Read up on the Spanish Civil War sometime, and look at the what the Spanish "Republic" was trying to. Then take a look at today.

The Cold War did not end. Only the tactics changed.
14 posted on 04/11/2006 6:53:58 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; DBeers


15 posted on 04/11/2006 12:45:22 PM PDT by Coleus (What were Ted Kennedy, his son & nephew doing on Good Friday, 1991? Getting drunk and raping women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; Annie03; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search

A belated but informative ping! Intimidation -a tool of the left...

16 posted on 04/11/2006 1:19:18 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers; Coleus

Thanks for your perseverence - I meant to read it and it got "lost" in the shuffle.

Everyone should read this.


17 posted on 04/11/2006 2:15:44 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Tolerating evil IS evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson