Skip to comments.
CA: The Minimum Wage Calamity
CaliforniaRepublic.org ^
| 1/5/06
| Ray Haynes
Posted on 01/05/2006 9:06:49 AM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: leoncaruthers
How, precisely, is one person doing something one time a "good experiment"?
Actually, the point of the book is that millions of people are doing the same thing, everyday. She is just the first one of them that happened to be a published writer.
Did you read the book?
61
posted on
01/05/2006 2:18:55 PM PST
by
hybrid
To: yellowdoghunter; parsifal
"We all talk advantage of the services they provide, or probably will one day."
When you take advantage of the services they provide, by all means, pay them what the service is worth to you at that time. The government has no business stipulating the value of the exchange.
62
posted on
01/05/2006 2:19:52 PM PST
by
Conservative Goddess
(Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
To: NormsRevenge
According to an analysis produced by the National Center of Policy Analysis, The primary cause of low income,
, is no wages, not low wages. They conclude that most of those who earn low wages are either teen-agers or other secondary earners spread rather evenly across the income distribution scale. According to a summary of their analysis, While the single mother trying to support her child on a full-time minimum wage job is a better story, the 16-year-old hamburger-flipping student with college-educated and employed parents is a better fact. Low-income families have a large number of people without jobs and without the skills to get a job. A mandated minimum wage forces them even further out of the job market.Economic eugenics.
63
posted on
01/05/2006 2:21:24 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Most of the Wal-Mart and McDonald's workers are part-timers, kids in high school or college, or those using it as a 2nd job. If you consider Wal-Mart or McDonald's a lifetime career choice, then something is seriously wrong with you.
I hate to say this, but you are incredibly wrong in regards to... all aspects of that sentence. I've known people that did the 'work yourself up' at McD's... years ago, mind you. And I know that both corps encourage you to make a 'career' out of it. But the most common long-term worker I tend to run into at these locations tend to be mothers/fathers struggling to support a family. Often it is the only 'second job' they can find, and are attempting to work around their kids' schedule.
64
posted on
01/05/2006 2:25:14 PM PST
by
hybrid
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
You didn't mention if you knew many poor people. :)
65
posted on
01/05/2006 2:27:49 PM PST
by
hybrid
To: hybrid
"In other words, if you are poor it is your own damn fault?"
Ah, yeah. The result of bad choices made along the way. Too many Americans think the world owes them a living. It doesn't. The poorest Americans still have running water, sanitation, TV, telephone, electricity, etc. You don't know what poverty is. I suggest that you go to a third world country...pop in on the "rich" there....then come back to the US, crying in your beer about "the poor." Your naivete is stunning.
66
posted on
01/05/2006 2:28:01 PM PST
by
Conservative Goddess
(Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
To: ThinkDifferent
That would depend on what each is charging. Which means that the poor guy gets screwed by minimum wage laws since they limit his ability to compete by offering a lower price.
Dude, you are missing the point. Minimum wage is not living wage these days. It has not kept up with inflation. Offering LESS money than minimum wage is not going to enable any of the poor to dig out of their hole. He can't 'compete' because nobody WANTS him to compete. Nobody WANTS to see the guy with the ugly shoes and badly fitting suit in their office. He will never be able to compete for an office job. And an office job is, quite literally, one of the few areas where you can possibly move up and earn a decent living. Manufacturing? dying. moving. Farming? Not viable in most areas; land is too expensive. Labor? mostly operating machines these days, far more limited.
So what should they do?
67
posted on
01/05/2006 2:32:47 PM PST
by
hybrid
To: parsifal
Employer's greatest responsibility is to make a profit. Actions contrary to the market are irresponsible.
An employee is free to go where ever he can get the most pay. Slavery in not legal.
You are suggesting paying a premium for incompetance.
68
posted on
01/05/2006 2:41:27 PM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
To: yellowdoghunter
I see employers living the extremely high-life while they pay their employees a meager salary. The first example I could give of that would be nursing home owners, but I could go on. My first real job was in a nursing home. The owner worked in the front office, I worked in the kitchen. Had the minimum wage been higher, there would have been two outcomes: the less likely one is I would have lost my job. The more likely one is everybody else, including wage-earners for families, would have been paid a little bit less.
69
posted on
01/05/2006 2:41:49 PM PST
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: Conservative Goddess
Ah, yeah. The result of bad choices made along the way.
So, a bad choice that leaves you bankrupt and homeless means you deserve to be homeless for... well, you don't deserve any help to STOP being homeless. SO... you'll probably continue to be homeless. (just statistics there)
Too many Americans think the world owes them a living
Nope. Just a decent paying job. If you work 40+ hours a week, as hard as you can, and cannot pay your bills no matter what you do... so you take a second job, working another 20+ a week... and exhaust yourself, completely, and remain unable to get ahead. I've *been* there. Sheer luck got ME out of that hole. That, and my mom is a great lady.
The poorest Americans still have running water, sanitation, TV, telephone, electricity, etc.
Not all of them, not everwhere. Also, I am tired of everyone assuming that if you have any electronics or furniture you must be fine. I grab stuff for free from college students; it is the only reason I have a couch.
You don't know what poverty is. I suggest that you go to a third world country...pop in on the "rich" there....then come back to the US, crying in your beer about "the poor." Your naivete is stunning.
You are assuming a great many things with that last line. You assume I don't know how people in other countries live. I am not saying that our poor aren't better off than they would be if they lived in... oh, Africa or the Middle East. This isn't about other places. This is about HERE.
70
posted on
01/05/2006 2:43:41 PM PST
by
hybrid
To: palmer
I gotta ask, cause I've seen this over and over and OVER again.
Have any of you, anywhere, ever seen a store lay off people because the minimum wage went up and they couldn't afford to keep everyone?
I have personally never seen it happen.
71
posted on
01/05/2006 2:45:38 PM PST
by
hybrid
To: Conservative Goddess
I suggest that you go to a third world country...pop in on the "rich" there....then come back to the US, crying in your beer about "the poor." Your naivete is stunning. I will grant you that. I spent time in Columbia and my parents lived there for quite awhile. Most Americans have no idea what poor really is. However, we now see the poor rising up and electing Socialist in Venezuela, Bolivia, etc...because the rich were so rich (and believe me the rich live like Kings and Queens) and the poor so poor, there was nothing in between. I hope America does not turn into that.
Not that I am in favor of Socialism, but I understand why the people rose up over there and demanded change.
72
posted on
01/05/2006 2:45:53 PM PST
by
yellowdoghunter
(I sometimes only vote for Republicans because they are not Democrats. by Thomas Sowell)
To: palmer
The owner worked in the front office... Wonder how much the owner was making?????
73
posted on
01/05/2006 2:49:07 PM PST
by
yellowdoghunter
(I sometimes only vote for Republicans because they are not Democrats. by Thomas Sowell)
To: hybrid
It's a bit of a red herring question. The NH I worked at had a limited budget for salaries but a rise in minimum would have only affected a couple of people like me (I was 16-17). An increase for me might have meant a slight decrease or raises withheld for the others.
74
posted on
01/05/2006 2:50:44 PM PST
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: hybrid
A bad choice that leaves you homeless does not give you, or the government the moral authority to demand that I contribute to the "BAIL YOU OUT" fund.
Sheer luck got you out of the hole? Where would you have been but for the hard work? The hard work played no role in your exit from "the hole?" Buncombe. I have been there. Worked my way out of the hole and I'm better for it. Your bills do not dictate the value of your work. Your wage should dictate the level of your spending.
You grab stuff free from college students? Bwahhahahah. You are still better off than 99% of the world. The world, this country, does not owe you a specified standard of living.
I've lived in other parts of the world and I repeat, Your naivete is stunning.
75
posted on
01/05/2006 2:52:08 PM PST
by
Conservative Goddess
(Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
To: yellowdoghunter
He made everything that wasn't being paid to us. He drove a Cadillac but I was respectful not resentful because that was my upbringing. I think a lot of attitudes about the "rich" are passed down like that.
76
posted on
01/05/2006 2:53:06 PM PST
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: hybrid
But the most common long-term worker I tend to run into at these locations tend to be mothers/fathers struggling to support a family. Often it is the only 'second job' they can find, and are attempting to work around their kids' schedule. You are insinuating that the "mothers/fathers" you cite are those who previously had careers but lost their jobs to the evil Bush regime and are now "struggling" to make ends meet by working at McDonald's or Wal-Mart. This sounds like a CBS Evening News report. I'll bet that the mothers and fathers in questions are those who are in their late teens or early 20s with low job skills who made poor decisions (by partying and having kids early) instead of planning for their future.
To: hybrid
You didn't mention if you knew many poor people No, I don't.
All my friends and family members worked their way up from scratch and are doing well in their respective fields of employment.
To: hybrid
Have any of you, anywhere, ever seen a store lay off people because the minimum wage went up and they couldn't afford to keep everyone? It doesn't happen overnight.
The business owner will try hard to retain his employees and look for other ways to cut costs before reluctantly deciding to terminate the least productive employee or employees.
To: NormsRevenge
Aren't union salaries in multiples of the minimum wage?.
80
posted on
01/05/2006 2:59:33 PM PST
by
TheLion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson