Okay, here's a famous one: 
They're after our children ping.
In the grand scheme of things British, how important is "gay history" compared to, say, the Magna Carta or the battle of Trafalgar?
"Sir Ian has promoted gay rights since becoming the Met's chief. He has appointed 24 diversity advisers on £35,000-a-year salaries and spoken at gay events."
UK University major: Diversity Adviser
-guaranteed employment with the Bureaucracy
Beyond belief!
This must be a preemptive sensatizing with the expectation of some significant closet outings.
PLEEZE NOT WINSTON CHURCHILL!
And when the Islamic Radicals increase their raids in England
the LGBT Supporters will be the first to lose their heads
HOMESCHOOL!
> The organisers also want historical figures labelled homosexual - even if there is no evidence they were gay.
OK. How's about these guys:
Jack the Ripper
Oswald Mosley
Al Capone
Adolf Hitler
Joe Stalin
Pol Pot
Mohammad
Hey, why not...
Shakespeare was married to Anne Hathaway wrote most of his poetry to her, had children, etc etc. Now he is outed as Gay. I have never seen evidence for that. I hate this nonsense it is the same crap that got Richard the LionHeart outed because he slept in the same bed with a man (common medieval practice in no way sexual) and because he wrote about his love for another man (another common medieval practice and not an expression of sexual love).
Okay.
Jack the Ripper? Gay.
Burke and Hare? Leather boys of a longstanding relationship.
Sweeney Todd? Big maneating sissy boy.
Lord Haw Haw? Made all his broadcasts from Berlin in drag.
Oscar Wilde? Fathered children with different mothers from Edinburgh to Brighton, and was ghostwritten by a Frenchman.
This is fun. History relaly comes alive when you can rewrite it at will!
It would be cold day in Hell before I would submit my child to this sexual socialization program. We never used sexually explicit swear words or references in my home.
I do not doubt that **Namba** endorses this program.
add this longer read to this story
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007760
Which does not, if true, make Shakespeare gay. This is a classic literary mystery - who was the "W.H." to whom Shakespeare dedicated the Sonnets in question?
It could, of course, be worse - I read a very plausible argument that "W.H." was one William Hughes, a boy actor who played Shakespeare's female roles, and who was stolen away not by another lover but by another acting company. When NAMBLA gets hold of that one you'll be reading that old Will was a pedophile as well. He isn't, of course, around to defend himself.
Holy cow. Why is Scotland Yard (!) involved in this?
As bad as things have gotten here, Britain is FAR worse.
But tell that to Gwynneth.
Okay, here's a famous one:
Home schooling bump.
Homosexual Agenda Mega Barf Ping.
No, it's not nauseating because of lurid details. It's stuffed with horrible examples of the government promotion of not only pro-homosexual propaganda but outright psychotic lies. But I repeat myself.
And lest anyone thinks, "Oh, that's England. Won't happen here" - the promoters of the "gay" agenda know no national boundaries. They're pushing all over the globe, and we haven't seen the end of their goals yet. They are after children to swell their ranks ("fresh meat") and raise up nice obedient tax paying supporters of their agenda.
Note how the 24 "diversity whatevers" the police hired are pulling goodly salaries. This tells us that if the government is not supporting crap, it's not going to fly. Reduce gov't spending to the bare essentials and many social problems will wither on the vine.
Freepmail me and DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.
One kid sez to the other "I'd like to make that gay history."
It's probably easier to remember than biblical history. There's not a lot of "begats".