To: Junior; RadioAstronomer
You can't prove a negative.Gee. I guess that leaves the assertion that "ID is not science" as an open question then, doesn't it?
To: Fester Chugabrew
Gee. I guess that leaves the assertion that "ID is not science" as an open question then, doesn't it?Cute, but hardly.
The real assertion in that case is "ID fails to meet the basic requirements of scientific inquiry", which is easy enough to prove. One need only the sworn testimony of its own proponent, Dr. Behe.
398 posted on
01/04/2006 7:47:46 AM PST by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: Fester Chugabrew
Gee. I guess that leaves the assertion that "ID is not science" as an open question then, doesn't it? Not really. ID must prove itself a science to be included.
401 posted on
01/04/2006 7:54:59 AM PST by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson