[highball]

Gee. I guess that leaves the assertion that "ID is not science" as an open question then, doesn't it?

Cute, but hardly.

The real assertion in that case is "ID fails to meet the basic requirements of scientific inquiry", which is easy enough to prove. One need only the sworn testimony of its own proponent, Dr. Behe.

[Fester Chugabrew]

"ID fails to meet the basic requirements of scientific inquiry", which is easy enough to prove.

Okay. Since it's easy enough to prove, please be my guest. Prove it.