Skip to comments.
Move to Impeach Bush is Gaining Ground (Left's wishful thinking alert)
The Nation ^
| 01/03/2006
| Katrina vanden Heuvel
Posted on 01/03/2006 9:06:38 AM PST by SirLinksalot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: SirLinksalot
2
posted on
01/03/2006 9:07:29 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all our troops at home and abroad!!)
To: SirLinksalot
I kinda wish the Dems would put their money where their mouth is and go all the way --- BRING IT ON !!!
We'll see how this plays out to the American people on November 2006.
To: SirLinksalot
Katrina vanden Heuvel is the most miserable woman on the planet.
4
posted on
01/03/2006 9:09:58 AM PST
by
rightinthemiddle
(I might be wrong, but I'm always right.)
To: SirLinksalot
If the Left fought America's enemies as vigorously as they fight America, we'd have 100 years of peace easily!
5
posted on
01/03/2006 9:10:15 AM PST
by
xrp
(My current list of worshippers: MNJohnnie)
To: SirLinksalot
And at the end of the year, John Dean weighed in...And barely tipped the scale.
6
posted on
01/03/2006 9:10:21 AM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: SirLinksalot
With a Dem lapdog like Specter heading Judiciary, anything is possible. What fools the Republican senators were who voted for this senile dinsaur as chairman!
To: SirLinksalot
in the so-called "liberal" MSMLOL...stop it..my stomach. LOL
8
posted on
01/03/2006 9:11:32 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: SirLinksalot
9
posted on
01/03/2006 9:11:37 AM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: SirLinksalot
Impeachment is a non-issue as long as there is a Republican majority.
I know most people here disagree with me but I agreed with the Senate that the impeachment of Bil Clinton served no purpose and hurt the U.S. It would be nice if the Dems had learned from that rather than seeking revenge. But I suppose that is too much to hope for.
10
posted on
01/03/2006 9:11:59 AM PST
by
gondramB
(If even once you pay danegeld then you never get rid of the Dane.)
To: rightinthemiddle
I know what Katrina needs...
11
posted on
01/03/2006 9:11:59 AM PST
by
Russ
To: SirLinksalot
This article will buy Katrina VanWhat'shername another visit to Chrissy's show....
12
posted on
01/03/2006 9:12:19 AM PST
by
mystery-ak
(End Freepathons, become a monthly donor...)
To: SirLinksalot
13
posted on
01/03/2006 9:12:40 AM PST
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: SirLinksalot
Any article that starts out with Tom Delay's indictment is automatically filed in the "STUPID" drawer...
14
posted on
01/03/2006 9:13:42 AM PST
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: SirLinksalot
Crazed by the sound of their own howling, while the moon slides serenely across the night sky.
To: SirLinksalot
Katrina should be ashamed that The Nation is turning a profit.
To: SirLinksalot
Don't you find it interesting that when Clinton had Monica under his desk, the Democrats had no problem with him risking National Security? Even when Clinton gave military and space secrets to the Chinese, the Democrats just didn't have a problem. Now that leaks involving National Security are exposed, they STILL don't have a problem with it?
They are only preoccupied with Bush "eavesdropping" on potential Al Qaeda conversations while we are at war. They seem to think the NSA is listening in on their dirty little Democratic secrets or something.
To: SirLinksalot
Saw an article by Dick Morris in this morning's New York Post. Now I don't usually agree with Dick, but he said something I've said on other threads, and that is that President Bush's recent jump in the polls isn't necessarily because he's been on the offensive, but because the Dems have attacked him unmercifully for wanting to keep this country safe. The people are totally with the President when it comes to National Security. They don't care how it's done...just that he's doing it and we've been safe from attack so far. I hope they keep pushing this issue because it will only end up biting them in the arse. The more they speak out on privacy vs. national security, they're going to lose.
I see that Murtha is still spewing his stupidity and saying that he wouldn't join today's military. That's good, because we don't like traitors in uniform. But the more he speaks out against the President and the military, the more the people will choose the right side of the issue. This isn't the 60's, and there's alot of people out there who rebel against this type of rhetoric.
18
posted on
01/03/2006 9:14:35 AM PST
by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
To: SirLinksalot
John Dean weighed in on the parallels between the two Presidents. In his powerful article I love that word POWERFUL there. Is the article able to demolish mountains with a single punch???
To: SirLinksalot
If the democRATS take the House this year,Bush will almost certainly be impeached.But during the hearings in both the House and the Senate,all Mr Bush's people need to do is
1) recite the numerous quotes from democRATS since '98 stating how dangerous Sadaam was and how likely he was to cause serious trouble in the future 2)showing films of the WTC being hit by 767's and then falling and
3)if "illegal spying" is one of the charges,recite all the cries about "why didn't Bush connect the dots before 9/11?"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson