Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirLinksalot
Impeachment is a non-issue as long as there is a Republican majority.

I know most people here disagree with me but I agreed with the Senate that the impeachment of Bil Clinton served no purpose and hurt the U.S. It would be nice if the Dems had learned from that rather than seeking revenge. But I suppose that is too much to hope for.
10 posted on 01/03/2006 9:11:59 AM PST by gondramB (If even once you pay danegeld then you never get rid of the Dane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

Looking back on the whole impeachment matter, Gore would have risen to the Presidency. It would have given him an edge in the National vote. God knows what is going on.


33 posted on 01/03/2006 9:23:10 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
"Impeachment is a non-issue as long as there is a Republican majority."


End of story.


All else is flack from the alphabet media ack-ack guns, wishful thinking by RHINO presidential wanna be's and the enemy Democrat Party ilk.





36 posted on 01/03/2006 9:29:08 AM PST by G.Mason (I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is to try to please everyone -- Bill Cosby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

If you really want to tick off a dim, point out the fact that if clintern had sacrificed left office either forcefully or voluntarily, algore would have run as an incumbent in 2000, and would have probably been good for two terms.

Their blind support of slick cost them a lot! They really hate to hear that logic.


42 posted on 01/03/2006 9:33:05 AM PST by GaltMeister (“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

"I know most people here disagree with me but I agreed with the Senate that the impeachment of Bil Clinton served no purpose and hurt the U.S. It would be nice if the Dems had learned from that rather than seeking revenge. But I suppose that is too much to hope for."

The main problem is that the extremists in the Democratic Party are not being told by the, NORMAL democrats, to shut up and behave themselves. There are an adequate amount of forums, so there is no excuse. So, the question is, have the extremists, frightened, the NORMALS into submission? If not, they can find their spine and speak up just about anytime now.

Also, the impeachment by the Senate WOULD NOT have served a purpose, IF both parties were playing by the same rules. That is why I totally disagreed with my husband when he stated those same words to me. When the Senate did not impeach Clinton for perjury, that was telling him(and the rest of the miscreants) that it's just dandy if you choose to lie, cheat, or steal from those Americans. They can't figure anything out anyway, so we won't convict you. So, are they going to be proven right or wrong? And if they are proven right, it's just a grand welcome for some communist regime to take over America.


52 posted on 01/03/2006 9:41:44 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB
I know most people here disagree with me but I agreed with the Senate that the impeachment of Bil Clinton served no purpose and hurt the U.S.

Perjury and obstruction of justice are O.K. if committed by a sitting American President?

I presume you're arguing "the politics of the thing". But I fail to see how the House could've ignored Clinton's behavior in the matter.

93 posted on 01/03/2006 11:09:18 AM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson