Bush's Job Growth WORST in 50 Years (Roll out the red carpet for this “staunch Bush supporter.”)

bopnews ^ | Hale Stewart

[MNJohnnie]

Even worse, in my city, they seem to be DYING IN ALPHEBETICAL ORDER! Seriesly! I didn't believe it either, but I just checked the obits and it's TRUE!!

This is HUGH!

Oh my GOD! It's a plot it is happening here too!!! It's series!

[dljordan]

Hysteric leftist.

I love it. You're so very eloguent. I'm more conservative than you'll ever be. Bush is not a conservative.

[airborne]

And post # 94 and 3 112 and # 119 (not #127) and # 146 and #166 and # 178.


You get my point?

[RJL]

Today, I want to compare Bush’s job creation record with other economic recoveries. As usual, Bush comes up way short.

Each of the periods listed covers parts of two administrations.
1961 - 1969 Presidents Kennedy & Johnson
1975 - 1980 Presidents Ford & Carter
1982 - 1990 Presidents Reagan & Bush
1991 - 2001 Presidents Bush & Clinton

Why aren’t we comparing President Bush, one on one to the other Presidents?

Why aren’t we taking into account the historical problems President Bush has faced?

1. The recession President Bush inherited.

2. The Enron fraud that prospered during the Clinton administration and was uncovered and prosecuted by the Bush administration.

3. The Sept 11th attacks on America’s seats of commerce, military and government (the intended destination of flight 93).

4. The Iraq war, which has been fought and led second to none, still has been very costly.

Each President works in a unique time and set of circumstances which needs to be viewed in a larger national and world picture, it’s not as easy as cherry picking a few statistics and proving a President “comes up way short”.

[Sensei Ern]

Wow, not zotted, yet.

IB4Z

[jennyjenny]

You do NOT criticize the president here. This is not allowed.

Are you kidding? The president is criticized here all the time....but to criticize him on this issue is just someone looking to criticize for the sake of it. It's ridiculous and typical liberal BS.

[confederacy of dunces]

That's just wrong!

I mean, c'mon, Hillary in a skirt?

[COEXERJ145]

You do NOT criticize the president here. This is not allowed.

Oh please, two long time members have gone so far as to make comments worthy of USSC visits because they hate the President so much. Then others refer to him as "BuSHIT" and plan to campaign for Democrats in 2006 in order to "impeach BuSHIT".

[airborne]

You do NOT criticize the president here. This is not allowed.

You've been here long enough to know that's just not true!

Have anything relevent to add to the thread?

[wireman]

IBTZ!!!

[darkangel82]

He is a troll, he's just looking for trouble.

[Admin Moderator]

Um...am I the only one here who thinks the 'zotted' person in question is actually looking for answers?

It looks that way, and technically speaking we haven't unleashed the zot yet. So, feel free to engage in intelligent discourse with the poster for a little while longer. In the meantime, conditions are ripe for heavy thunderstorm activity.

[UCANSEE2]

The nature of the employment sector has changed rapidly ovr the past seven years.

All of the older mainframe technology and software is being replaced by PC based servers and network systems.

Many are being forced to 'reeducate' themselves to try and find work in the same section of the economy.

The MSM is cutting losses and laying off workers.

Hollywood itself is failing, and employs less.

None of these are the fault nor can be fixed by the President.

[kenavi]

That's why there is a big, big gap between the "jobs" survey and the employment/unemployment numbers. People are working---it's just that a lot are not working for someone else.

Right-o. There is a "Household Survey" by the gov't that captures the self-employed data, and which shows a historically strong surge in gainful employment. Here is one reference to it:

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_buzzcharts/buzzcharts200408240832.asp

Kery-ites have a blind spot to the self-employed. They confuse an entrepreneur whose business earns more than $200,000 a year with the "idle rich" (which is what HE is). They must think the chap has all his income lying about as cash in the vault and not re-invested in his business.

[MNJohnnie]

I know, I was being facetious.

Oh I am sorry. That is EXACTLY the kind of response you get when you debate a Leftist only THEY are serious!!! You do an excellent Leftist impression.

[Paul_Denton]

Zot!

[MNJohnnie]

Read the article. This is a flaming slander NOT an attempt to get answers. This person basically just thru out every Democrat Talking point with NO regard at all for reality or fact.

[darkangel82]

In the meantime, conditions are ripe for heavy thunderstorm activity.

LOL!

*puts on his raincoat and boots*

[6ppc]

The expansion of 3/75 – 7/80 created 13,183 total jobs and 12,831 at 49 months.

I suspect the numbers are bogus. If we added 13 million jobs during the Carter years I must have been dreaming about how hard it was to find a decent job!

[Mark17]

As a staunch Bush supporter,

Are you one of these guys that calls Rush and says, I am a Republican, B-U-T.....?