Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2006 12:27:49 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Kaslin

I hope Byron Calame has his resume updated. ;-)


2 posted on 01/02/2006 12:30:34 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Under the law, the newspaper was required to escalate the information to the Senate Intelligence Committee and then to cork it.

Treason applies. There is no backdoor for "woefully inadequate" explanations. Hope that they still offer jumpsuits with stripes.


3 posted on 01/02/2006 12:31:30 PM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake and Bushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

"Stonewalling" = Criminal Obstruction of Justice


4 posted on 01/02/2006 12:34:07 PM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
In its initial report on Dec. 16, Times said that editors held the story at the request of the White House, then edited out some - but not all - of the information that Bush administration officials warned would compromise national security.

Looks like laws were broken to me, very serious laws in fact.

And now the CYA campaign beguins.

6 posted on 01/02/2006 12:35:33 PM PST by bayliving (Dems used to be funny. Now they're just dangerous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Accuse them of treason and go after them like there is no tomorrow. Then we'll see how much stonewalling they will do. Freedom of the press does not begin to allow disobeying the law.


7 posted on 01/02/2006 12:35:42 PM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I'm hoping that the nyt has stepped in so deep this time, that there will be no way out except for lengthy jail sentences for treason.


9 posted on 01/02/2006 12:36:08 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What if we told them that chuckie schumer wanted them to cooperate, would they have a change of heart?


11 posted on 01/02/2006 12:39:36 PM PST by hoosierboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The NYT held the story so they could release it for maximum effect.
Is it a coincidence that it was released on the eve if the vote on the Patriot Act?

As for the source of the story...the Justice Dept. nedds to start leaning on them...hard.

12 posted on 01/02/2006 12:39:43 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Crime cannot be tolerated. Criminals thrive on the indulgences of society's understanding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
They held out no hope for a fuller explanation in the future,

What part of "no attacks in four years" don't these morons understand?

14 posted on 01/02/2006 12:41:48 PM PST by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
New York Times executives are "stonewalling" on questions about the paper's decision to publish top secret information ..........

But.......but........what about the "people's right to know" ?

15 posted on 01/02/2006 12:42:44 PM PST by oldbrowser (No matter how cynical I get, I can't seem to keep up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Let the NYT twist slowly in the wind.


19 posted on 01/02/2006 12:48:34 PM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
New York Times executives are "stonewalling" on questions about the paper's decision to publish top secret information .......

When you have commited a crime, that is your constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment.

20 posted on 01/02/2006 12:50:10 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It's astounding, the NY times is fleeting
Editor madness, has taken its toll
But listen closely, not for very much longer
It's time for Justice Department, to take control


22 posted on 01/02/2006 12:51:54 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Time to declare the Slimes as ENEMEDIA aiders and comforters!

Lets see..... publishing NATIONAL SECURITY operations for the world to see..... Yep TREASON!!!!!!!

ABC CBS NBC CNN its all the SAME, Propaganda.
Might as well call them all AmeriJazerra.
Show them how much Gravitas Hugh Bris has. Vote with your remote! Shut down the Alphabet channels.

He's Got A Plan
Zippo Hero

Kill A Commie For Mommie
Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes

25 posted on 01/02/2006 12:59:05 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic cerem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What is the "public editor" ?


28 posted on 01/02/2006 1:06:18 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; Grampa Dave; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; bitt; Lady Jag; Travis McGee; Jeff Head; ...


Two options for the MSM traitors:

1 - Firing squad
2 - Hanging


I'm deadly serious

Those accusing GW are part of illegal the leaking of top secret information and documents

They know they are going to be exposed and nailed

Under existing federal statutes any and all profits and other income dereived thru the publishing of confidential information is foreited to the US Treasury

The NYT licenses and access should be pulled immediately

Instant banning from any WH press conferences

Shut the traitorous SOBs down now

They are lobbying McCain to pass unconstitutional legistlation giving the press immunity from investigation and prosecution

In effect a new branch of government that is unaccountable and partners only with the democrat party

Sooner or later the public will take any actions required to correct these illegal traitorous actions - and I do not refer to boycotts or dropping subscriptions

No jury will convict anyone who takes action against a traitor to the USA

The media declared war on America and is a willing greedy traitorous partner of Al Qaeda

Time to castrate and hang these scumbags

--

On a sidenote I see that INTEL has at least one full-time employee who is working for the DNC during working hours using INTEL computers and INTEL email accounts linked to various democat websites
This is a deliberate and wilful and illegal felony violation of federal and state campaign finance and election statutes

It is an illegal under the table massive contribution by the INTEL employee and INTEL corporation itself

--






30 posted on 01/02/2006 1:13:55 PM PST by devolve (<-- (-in a manner reminiscent of Senator Gasbag F. Kohnman-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

do I really have to say it???

31 posted on 01/02/2006 1:17:05 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

let them stonewall in jail after they have been frog marched away by the FBI.


33 posted on 01/02/2006 1:24:19 PM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What is ironic is that they will not provide reasons for their decision to publish, while attacking/subverting their own government for its decision to not provide an explanation for its intelligence gathering.

The difference is that the government (we hope and trust) has our national security interests to consider before blabbing, whereas the hacks at NYT only are covering their butts and their left-leaning friends in DC.

The NYT AND the leaker(s) are traitors, aren't they?


41 posted on 01/02/2006 1:45:17 PM PST by jbp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
first six stories in the NEW YORK TIMES TREASON SERIES
52 posted on 01/02/2006 2:44:00 PM PST by doug from upland (NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson