do I really have to say it???
Posted on 01/02/2006 12:27:47 PM PST by Kaslin
Why haven't the Republicans been out in front of this explaining that there is a HUGE difference between what Nixon did and what the NSA is doing now?
As if I had to explain, (and if I can then why can't the pubs)? Watergate was spying on your political enemy. What the NSA is doing is spying on those who would make hometown USA glow green in the middle of the night if given the chance.
Demoncraps would rather have one of our cities nuked than do what it takes to keep us safe.
They disgust me, and quite frankly, the lack of defense of our president by his own party is sickening too.
It's astounding, the NY times is fleeting
Editor madness, has taken its toll
But listen closely, not for very much longer
It's time for Justice Department, to take control
Ticked me off! I was looking for the complete Calame article, cuz, I'm tellin you, he was no where near as mad as the NewsMax article implies!
Lets see..... publishing NATIONAL SECURITY operations for the world to see..... Yep TREASON!!!!!!!
ABC CBS NBC CNN its all the SAME, Propaganda.
Might as well call them all AmeriJazerra.
Show them how much Gravitas Hugh Bris has. Vote with your remote! Shut down the Alphabet channels.
He's Got A Plan
Zippo Hero
Well that was a worthless piece of so called journalism
Thanks for sharing.
Don't say that I didn't warn you!
What is the "public editor" ?
The job of the public editor is to critique the practices, standards and culture of the newspaper, to identify and examine critical errors and omissions, and to act as a liaison to the public.
Two options for the MSM traitors:
1 - Firing squad
2 - Hanging
I'm deadly serious
Those accusing GW are part of illegal the leaking of top secret information and documents
They know they are going to be exposed and nailed
Under existing federal statutes any and all profits and other income dereived thru the publishing of confidential information is foreited to the US Treasury
The NYT licenses and access should be pulled immediately
Instant banning from any WH press conferences
Shut the traitorous SOBs down now
They are lobbying McCain to pass unconstitutional legistlation giving the press immunity from investigation and prosecution
In effect a new branch of government that is unaccountable and partners only with the democrat party
Sooner or later the public will take any actions required to correct these illegal traitorous actions - and I do not refer to boycotts or dropping subscriptions
No jury will convict anyone who takes action against a traitor to the USA
The media declared war on America and is a willing greedy traitorous partner of Al Qaeda
Time to castrate and hang these scumbags
--
On a sidenote I see that INTEL has at least one full-time employee who is working for the DNC during working hours using INTEL computers and INTEL email accounts linked to various democat websites
This is a deliberate and wilful and illegal felony violation of federal and state campaign finance and election statutes
It is an illegal under the table massive contribution by the INTEL employee and INTEL corporation itself
--
do I really have to say it???
let them stonewall in jail after they have been frog marched away by the FBI.
It's time for some warped humor!
Thanks. I bet he feels empowered.....
Somehow I think the public editor is supposed to be a patronage appointment and the employee should remember that and say nothing ( at least according to upper management anyway ).
Actually Nixon didn't do anything wrong either. Yes Nixon was spying on the democrats, but only because he believed the democratic party had been infiltrated by communists... which it had.
Disagree. 70% of the population side with the President on this one. This story is effectively over for the Media, except for the upcoming jailing of reporters for not revealing sources, and the upcoming charges and convictions against the leakers.
This story is a definate win for our side and a disaster for the MSM and the Democrats.
Thankyou! Thankyou! I was starting to get very frustrated. I'm not so sure that I'm willing to just trust NewsMax on this one, and, a lot of the posters here are gettin' way off track. Although I agree with them. I do think that NewsMax and Michelle Malkin "cherry-picked" Calame's article to just show the points they wanted to make. I'm kinda surprised at MM today. She's usually much better than that! But,,, I'm still hopelessly in love with her!
Calame was mad about one thing and only one thing- the NY Times didn't publish the story before the presidential election. He had absolutely no problem with the national security information being leaked and he was adamant the leakers identity be protected. Calame was pissed the Times didn't do more to politically damage Bush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.