Posted on 01/02/2006 4:19:44 AM PST by ventana
AP Middle-Class Job Losses Batter Workforce Sunday January 1, 8:53 pm ET By Kathy Barks Hoffman, Associated Press Writer Middle-Class Job Losses Batter Workforce As Companies Slash Payrolls, Send Jobs Overseas
LANSING, Mich. (AP) -- Thirty years ago, Dan Fairbanks looked at the jobs he could get with his college degree and what he could make working the line at General Motors Corp., and decided the GM job looked better.
He still thinks he made the right choice. But with GM planning to end production of the Chevrolet SSR and shut down the Lansing Craft Centre where he works sometime in mid-2006, Fairbanks faces an uncertain future.
"Back when I hired in at General Motors 30 years ago, it seemed like a good, secure job," said Fairbanks, president since June of UAW Local 1618. Since then, "I've seen good times and I've seen bad times. This qualifies as a bad time, in more ways than one."
Many of the country's manufacturing workers are caught in a worldwide economic shift that is forcing companies to slash payrolls or send jobs elsewhere, leaving workers to wonder if their way of life is disappearing.
The trend in the manufacturing sector toward lower pay, fewer benefits and fewer jobs is alarming many of them.
"They end up paying more of their health care and they end up with lousier pensions -- if they keep one at all," says Michigan AFL-CIO President Mark Gaffney. As wages and benefits drop, "it's the working class that's paying the price."
West Virginia steelworkers are all too familiar with the problem. The former Weirton Steel Corp., which 20 years ago had some 13,000 employees, today has just 1,300 union workers left on the job.
The steel mill has changed hands twice in two years, and just last month, Mittal Steel Co. told the Independent Steelworkers Union it would permanently cut the jobs of 800 people who'd been laid off since summer.
Larry Keister, 50, of Weirton, W.Va., has 31 years in the mill that his father and brothers all joined. His son tried, but got laid off quickly.
"I'm too old to go back to school. I've worked there all my life," says Keister, who drives a buggy in the tin mill. "I went there straight out of high school. It's all I know."
Though Keister is safe for now from layoffs, he wonders what will happen to the hundreds of friends and co-workers who will be jobless by the end of January.M
Gary Colflesh, 56, of Bloomingdale, Ohio, said there are few jobs in nearby Ohio or Pennsylvania for workers to move to.
"They're destroying the working class. Why can't people see this?" asked the 38-year veteran. "Anybody who works in manufacturing has no future in this country, unless you want to work for wages they get in China."
Abby Abdo, 52, of Weirton, said workers once believed that if they accepted pay cuts and shunned strikes, they would keep their jobs. Not anymore.
"Once they get what they want, they kick us to the curb," he said. "There's no guarantee anymore. No pensions. No health care. No job security. We have none of those things anymore."
Fairbanks of the Lansing GM plant said the changes are going to force a lot of people to retrench to deal with the new economic reality. For some, it will make it harder to send their children to college or be able to retire when they want. For others, it will mean giving up some of the trappings a comfortable income can bring.
"You're going to see lake property, you're going to see boats, you're going to see motorcycles hit the market," he said. "People get rid of the toys."
Economists agree the outlook is changing for workers who moved from high school to good-paying factory jobs two and three decades ago, or for those seeking that lifestyle now.
"It was possible for people with a high school education to get a job that paid $75,000 to $100,000 and six weeks of paid vacation. Those jobs are disappearing," says Patrick Anderson of Anderson Economic Group in East Lansing, Mich. "The ... low-skill, upper-middle-class way of life is in danger."
General Motors Corp. has announced that it plans to cut 30,000 hourly jobs by 2008. Ford Motor Co. is scheduled to announce plant closings and layoffs in January that could affect at least 15,000 workers in the United States and Mexico, analysts say, and is cutting thousands from its white-collar work force.
GM and Ford have won concessions from the United Auto Workers that will require active and retired workers to pick up more of their health care costs, and DaimlerChrysler AG is seeking similar concessions.
Thomas Klier, senior economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, says the transition for manufacturers toward leaner, lower-cost operations has been going on for some time. But the bankruptcy of the nation's largest auto supplier, Delphi Corp., pushed the issue into the headlines.
Its 34,000 hourly U.S. workers could see their pay cut from $27 an hour to less than half of that, although the company is still trying to work out a compromise unions will support. Workers also could have to pay health care deductibles for the first time and lose their dental and vision care coverage.
Delphi worker Michael Balls of Saginaw, Mich., hears the argument that U.S. companies' costs are too high to compete with plants that pay workers less overseas, but he doesn't buy it.
"I think if Delphi wins, they lose," he says. "If I'm making $9 an hour, I'm not making enough to buy vehicles."
Unfortunately for workers like Balls, the old rules no longer apply in the new global economy, says John Austin, a senior fellow with the Washington-based Brookings Institute.
"We're in a different ball game now," Austin says. "We're going to be shedding a lot of the low-education manufacturing jobs."
Some of those workers are likely to try to move into the growing service sector, Austin says. But he says the transition can be tough, even if the jobs pay as well as the ones they had -- and many don't.
"Pointing out a medical technician job is available if they go back and get a certificate doesn't solve the issue today for those 45-year-olds who are losing their jobs at Delphi," he said.
Dick Posthumus, a partner in an office furniture system manufacturing company in Grand Rapids, Mich., says that "basic, unskilled manufacturing is going to be done in China, India, places like that because we are in a global world, and there's nothing anyone can do about that."
His company, Compatico Inc., buys much of its basic parts from South Korea, Taiwan, Canada and China, where Posthumus has toured plants he says rival modern manufacturing plants in the U.S. But the company still saves its sophisticated parts-making and assembly for its Michigan plant.
"The manufacturing of tomorrow is going to look somewhat different from the manufacturing of yesterday," Posthumus says. "It doesn't mean that we no longer manufacture ... (But) it's going to be a painful adjustment."
Associated Press Writer Vicki Smith in Morgantown, W.Va., contributed to this story.
Actually- I am having a GREAT time on this thread- LOL!
I am learning a few things, and the comedic value of some of the "cakes" is priceless....
I learned tonight that Fords are not made by 100% Americans.....lol--
Nothin' to lose!
Don't bother arguing with "IT."
"IT" is not worth your time. "IT" is very similar to a dinosaur. "IT" has a small brain and refuses to learn.
Read Thomas Sowell. It will change your life. Litterally.
My curiousity about your personal situation is piqued by this statement. Did you work on the hardware or the software of such systems? There are very, very few systems in the world that clock in the millions per minute. Various financial services and exchanges (equities, bonds, commodities, forex, etc.), credit card processing and extremely large retail operations like WalMart are the class of operations that use computer environments that handle $525.6 billion or more per year of transactions so frequent that you can measure downtime on a $1M (or more) per minute basis.
If you were one of the people who architect and manage such environments, then you should be able to parlay that experience into your own business.
Interesting sounding series...thanks for the title, author, and brief overview.
Historically, almost all but those living on the dole or sent to poor houses ( yes, America had them too ) did save; even if it was a penny a week. Not everyone put their money in banks ( and with so many PANICS and bank closures, you could hardly blame the almost indigent, or the lowest classes, who had scrimped and done without, just to put a little by ), but hide money in some secret place or yes, even under a mattress. But saving became something fewer and fewer people did, in the 20th century. And once we hit the 1950s, the numbers of savers dwindled even faster and faster.
GOD helps those who help themselves. And yes, I do believe in helping the truly needy, but FCOL, those who have to have what they can't really afford and/or be the first to have whatever is new/"in", no matter what...those people, I have NO patience with, when they come up short.
Read the full article. These whingers are union members, who squeezed and squeezed and SQUEEZED the companies and now that because of all of the perks and exorbitant high pay, have to lay off people or go out of business. Where were these yahoos, when the union bosses were demanding things that were unreasonable? THEY WERE THERE, EGGING THE UNION BOSSES ON, DEMANDING MORE AND MORE AND MORE!
Well, put that way, yes, we do seem to be having an "interesting" learning experience here; not to mention periodic spasm of hilarity.
Welcome to planet hedgetrimmer, nopardons. In this alternative universe, limited government-minded, market-extolling conservatives are traitors while those who love government and disdain markets are the patriots.
I'm still waiting for hedgetrimmer to identify one American citizen who isn't also a consumer. She hasn't been able to do so yet but I keep asking the question.
My RIGHTS have been "undermined by the fraudulently named "free traders"? They took away my right and ability to vote? WHEN, EXACTLY, DID THAT HAPPEN? I voted last November and nobody tried to stop me, nor was I ordered to vote for someone or something, that I did not want to.
What "RIGHTS", exactly ( please list them all in detail ) have been taken away from me.
I think hedgetrimmer is just suffering from "hat" envy....
I think you just have "IT" envy...
Or, were you speaking of yourself; dinosaur?
LOL! That's IT! That's all? LOL!
dang! I was having so much fun!
surely you can be more funny and creative than that.....
it's no fun when you don't try....
Toddspirit was here for just a bit, but I've been doing most of the usual refutation. LOL
hedgey is a SHE? Who knew?
Hope you all had a MARVELOUS Christmas!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.