Posted on 12/31/2005 7:26:14 PM PST by nj26
these sources ("officials") are so disconnected from the truth the NYTimes cant even name them as 'former' administration officicials like they usually do. (which really means Clinton sychophants)
Heck, they dont even call them 'government offials,' do they?
Approval for warrantless surveillance is given on a case by case basis, as are warrants, hence the ongoing nature of the approval process.
Thanks for the blog link...it is a good one.
The evidence is equivocal, but appears to point to a different reason for the balk by Comey.
SUNDAY, MARCH 14, 2004
WWW.USDOJ.GOVWASHINGTON, D.C.-- Attorney General John Ashcroft was discharged from the George Washington University Hospital shortly after noon today, March 14, 2004.
Attorney General Ashcroft entered G.W. Hospital on March 4, 2004 with a severe case of Gallstone Pancreatitis. On March 9, 2004, Attorney General Ashcroft underwent surgery to remove his gallbladder which contained several gallstones that were of concern to the doctors.
http://www.gwhospital.com/p13762.html
In mid-2004, concerns about the program expressed by national security officials, government lawyers and a judge prompted the Bush administration to suspend elements of the program and revamp it.For the first time, the Justice Department audited the N.S.A. program, several officials said. And to provide more guidance, the Justice Department and the agency expanded and refined a checklist to follow in deciding whether probable cause existed to start monitoring someone's communications, several officials said.
A complaint from Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, the federal judge who oversees the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court, helped spur the suspension, officials said. The judge questioned whether information obtained under the N.S.A. program was being improperly used as the basis for F.I.S.A. wiretap warrant requests from the Justice Department, according to senior government officials. While not knowing all the details of the exchange, several government lawyers said there appeared to be concerns that the Justice Department, by trying to shield the existence of the N.S.A. program, was in danger of misleading the court about the origins of the information cited to justify the warrants.
Bush Lets US Spy on Callers Without Courts
By JAMES RISEN and ERIC LICHTBLAU | New York Times | December 16, 2005
More leakers or just guessing?
Government CYA?
We can certainly blame the NY Times for alot of things, but right now- we still have people leaking stuff to them. It appears there is a leak in the justice department. Perhaps, that nice FISA judge that just retired???????
Thanks for MacRanger blog site. Is he a Freeper?
President Bush:
"When I take action, Im not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt. Its going to be decisive."
Mr Rockefeller speaks: "We live in a time in which we can never feel completely safe. There are terrorists around the world and here at home who have sworn to kill Americans"....
"Our challenge is to write the laws that stregthen our security without undermining privacy and liberty. This is something our Nation has never faced before".....
"The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 was designed to regulate the collection of foreign intelligence inside the United States using electronic wiretaps. Later, physical searches were added to the Law."
BEFORE FISA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH RAN WIRETAPS FOR NATIONAL SECURITY PURPOSES WITHOUT JUDICIAL REVIEW, WITHOUT APPROVAL OF ANY SORT." (Then he does the civil liberties bit...which makes security secondary. Please note that ACLU has already LOST its' case over FISA on the grounds that National Security comes first.
My Comment: FISA was in no way enacted to diminish the Powers of the President. It was so that the Justice Department could operate effectively in an electronic world..a world without bounds......period.
IMHO: Rockefeller is very clear as to his PERSONAL feelings about wiretapping and "that's nice". He just has some weird idea that everyday FISA rules apply to Presidential Powers. The use of an Executive Order for Pardons is another good example of a Power over which Congress has no say.
No idea...I got there by reference from Michelle Milkin's blog!
As it happens, an agent of Saddam Hussein [an American citizen who had received oil vouchers from the regime ] donated substantial funds to the defense fund of the Democrat who participated in the leak of that call between Gingrich and Boehner [and maybe others] after the Republicans sued.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.