Exactly. Same holds true of a lot of other things as well.
It seems like such a long time since I agreed with Pat.
What does that have to do with anything?
If you take the Biblical version of creation literally, the universe was created a long time before Christ got on the scene as well. What point is the author trying to make by pointing out that Aristotle was around before Christ?
1. Mutations are random.
2. Mutations are primarily lethal to the host.
3. A single mutation confers no cellular advantage to the cell or over other cells. There can be no pressure to "select" this mutational aberration over other normal cells.
4. Random events do not and cannot predict an endpoint.
5. Darwinists are stuck on stupid arguing incomplete fossil records and homologous appendages. Cell change occurs at a molecular biochemical level.
6. Darwinists are secularists. The abstraction called "Nature" is there God. They are anti-God, anti-religious, pompous, self-absorbed, arrogant, self-deluded zealots who quiver in fear that anyone should discover the flaws of their beloved Theory, the Theory they genuflect to.
for later perusal
Why should a public school, open to ALL, be explicitly Christian?
If you want your children to go to a "Christian School" there are many options for you. Don't send them to public school.
Ping!
Darwinism has nothing to say about the Prime Mover. Aristotle was wrong about a lot of things, like every great scientist is/has been - that's what so cool about science in comparison to theology.
Randomness is not random, it's just inexplicable. The Bible says very little about probability theory.
To ponder: What is the difference between order, design, intelligent design, and creation?
Neils Bohr, "Every sentence I utter is but a question.".
"Now, all of this is unproven theory"
Ahhh, it always raises a chuckle. Now then children, lets make a list of 'proven theories' shall we?
Really it's not worth the effort of ridiculing these people when they make themselves look so foolish all by themselves.
Lots of people understood evolution before Darwin published his doorstop of a book. The debate was well underway even by 1800 when Rev Paley fully anthropomorphized the universe.
later read.
Here is the text of Judge Jones decision.
It is a worthwhile read, (all 139 pages) and it does make some sense to read it before commenting on the subject.
http://www.sciohost.org/ncse/kvd/kitzmiller_decision_20051220.pdf
It's no wonder he's been marginalized in the last few years. He's a laughing stock. Which is why CNN still keeps him around, to laugh at him.
What a buffoon Buchanan has become.
Not bad for PB: 1 and 2 are false, 3 and 4 are true. Batting .500
"Animals or apes" although he could use an editor
Sorry Pat, but only lying creationists make such ignorant claims as that! Darwinism claims that through the process of natural selection, interbreeding populations gradually change as they adapt to changes in their environment.