1 posted on
12/31/2005 5:05:37 AM PST by
johnny7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: johnny7
It's high time we get serious about this... It is beyond the pale for this leaking to the MSM/dems and we have to be diligent in prosecuting these namby-pamby jealous prix. It's pure politics being waged to bring Bush down, and it is completely treasonist!!
I'm not exactly sure who's doing this, but there is no doubt they are enemies of America.
45 posted on
12/31/2005 6:09:39 AM PST by
sirchtruth
(Words Mean Things...)
To: johnny7
This could be laying the groundwork for whining about investigating and persecuting "whistleblowers."
46 posted on
12/31/2005 6:11:44 AM PST by
IamConservative
(Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times will pick himself up and carry on.)
To: johnny7
I believe that the Justice Department/FBI should follow this wherever it leads. If George Bush leaked this info or ordered it leaked then he should be indicted and impeached. If Rockefeller, or some other Senator is the source then he should be indicted and forced from office.
This should be a "no quarter" action...
To: johnny7
I think the leak came from either a disgruntled employee at NSA or someone within the NSA with a political agenda.
Also, I believe that if the are going to push this off on the white-house that they need to investigate the other WH administrations to see who they were spying on before there was a 9/11. We already know the Clintons were abusing their positions collecting FBI and IRS files on people they hated so lets go whole hog and see who comes out on top.
58 posted on
12/31/2005 6:19:49 AM PST by
Americanexpat
(A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
To: johnny7
The only "HIGH" is the one the LA Slimes staff is on.
63 posted on
12/31/2005 6:22:34 AM PST by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: johnny7
"reach high into the White House"
--This is too funny. It's like they're trying to re-gift 'Fritzmas' to their pathetic readership.
68 posted on
12/31/2005 6:26:18 AM PST by
Shqipo
(2006 is Bush Country!)
To: johnny7
Every time I read a story like this from the LA Times I keep hearing Dusty Springfield in the background:
"Wishin and Hopin
and Singin and Prayin..."
82 posted on
12/31/2005 6:33:20 AM PST by
Bernard
(Only the US government has the time, money and hubris to calculate exactly what it doesn't know.)
To: johnny7
A good start would be to jail the two NYT reporters if they don't give up their sources.
102 posted on
12/31/2005 6:47:59 AM PST by
Pusterfuss
(Proud member: Minnesotans for Global Warming)
To: johnny7
2006 may not be a good year for NYT; may they all go down in disgrace; Dummycrats and their cohorts in the MSM!
To: johnny7
So...it wasn't the devil himself, Tom Delay?
130 posted on
12/31/2005 7:33:37 AM PST by
cbkaty
(I may not always post...but I am always here......)
To: johnny7
My bet is someone in congress. I heard one of the guest on a news show state,"you know how the congress works" in regards to this leak.
131 posted on
12/31/2005 7:37:37 AM PST by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: johnny7
To: johnny7
I guess the MSM media is hoping the leak probe will somehow get Bush impeached by showing he did somthing illegal with repect to the wiretaps.
135 posted on
12/31/2005 7:40:38 AM PST by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: johnny7
Or it could and probably will flush out some traitorus scum left over from Clinton's regime.
138 posted on
12/31/2005 7:46:56 AM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(Maturity has brought me the wisdom to realize just what a world class dumb ass I really am.)
To: johnny7
The best part about all of this (and there isn't a best part when security is compromised) is that my Liberal friends are seeing right through the MSM spin machine now. Bush needs to stay on the offensive throughout the year.
153 posted on
12/31/2005 8:20:18 AM PST by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: johnny7
WhiteHouse, please...
HA ha...
159 posted on
12/31/2005 8:50:50 AM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: johnny7; MNJohnnie; All
161 posted on
12/31/2005 9:04:19 AM PST by
Mia T
To: johnny7
Since there's no doubt that the leaker(s) will be identified, I wonder if they'll step forward themselves...with the whistleblower defense. Sort of a pre-emptive strike?
To: johnny7
The New York Times reported Dec. 16 that beginning shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush authorized the National Security Agency to intercept and monitor international telephone calls and e-mails of people in the U.S. By law, the NSA is largely prohibited from conducting such domestic surveillance, and it is supposed to get permission in each specific case from a secret tribunal of federal judges formed under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Were they international or domestic? Or are they both? And does it make a difference? Inquiring minds want to know.
170 posted on
12/31/2005 10:13:53 AM PST by
Cboldt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson