Skip to comments.
CRS memo to Rep. Jim Gibbons re: machine gun database
Office of Jim Gibbons public release ^
| Nov. 28, 2005
| Congressional Research Staff
Posted on 12/30/2005 5:21:52 AM PST by BCR #226
A while back, Rep. Jim Gibbons requested the Congressional Research Staff to put together a memo concerning the NFRTR (NFA database) and reported abuses, missing information, etc.
The CRS compiled the memo and Jim Gibbons has released it. Here is a link to the PDF file. http://www.nfaoa.org/documents/CRSmemoNFRTR0001.pdf
This document shows coverups, deliberate illegal changes to the NFRTR database and brings to light the questionable practices of the BATF. Due to the nature of the abuses and the consequenses of the actions of the BATF, I feel that this document shows grounds for a repeal of the 1986 machine gun ban as well as the 1934 NFA.
I encourage all of you to read the document in depth and if you agree, contact your Congressional Representatives and Senators and urge them to support repeal of the above two laws.
This document is quite concerning and I believe that every NFA related conviction is in question now and should be reheard in the court of law.
Mike
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; banglist; batf; coriditeczars; criminalorg; crs; govpunk; govthug; gs2monkeys; jimgibbons; killers; machineguns; murderers; nfa; nfrtr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
The link once again...
http://www.nfaoa.org/documents/CRSmemoNFRTR0001.pdf
1
posted on
12/30/2005 5:21:56 AM PST
by
BCR #226
To: gieriscm; Joe Brower; archy
2
posted on
12/30/2005 5:22:52 AM PST
by
BCR #226
To: BCR #226
3
posted on
12/30/2005 5:24:58 AM PST
by
Lurker
(You don't let a pack of wolves into the house just because they're related to the family dog.)
To: BCR #226
4
posted on
12/30/2005 5:28:19 AM PST
by
Lurker
(You don't let a pack of wolves into the house just because they're related to the family dog.)
To: Lurker
LOL... yeah, I've read that several times. When you read the link I provided, you'll see that the CRS has generously provided more information on the Busey situation... and proof that it was not "misspoken" as the internal investigation at the time explained it away as.
Mike
5
posted on
12/30/2005 5:31:10 AM PST
by
BCR #226
To: BCR #226
This thread has just added to the FreeRepublic "bang list" (firearms interest list) by adding the keyword "banglist".
Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it.
Let Freedom Ring,
Click the pic to go to the Gun Facts v4.0 download page!
6
posted on
12/30/2005 5:36:22 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
7
posted on
12/30/2005 5:38:58 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: BCR #226
8
posted on
12/30/2005 6:18:35 AM PST
by
CHICAGOFARMER
(Right to Carry (RTC))
To: BCR #226; Joe Brower; Travis McGee; archy; Squantos; Dead Corpse; Dawsonville_Doc; ...
more to the point: does this document provide fodder for the repeal/dissolution of the BATFE itself?
9
posted on
12/30/2005 6:42:24 AM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: BCR #226
Would you post some of the important information as the dial-up crowd may not be able to download the 20.06 MB file.
Thanks,
10
posted on
12/30/2005 6:43:43 AM PST
by
Eaker
(My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix or El Roy off of my ping list.)
To: King Prout
One would hope. One would also hope that everyone currently employed by BATF would simply stop breathing. It's not like anyone would notice.
11
posted on
12/30/2005 7:03:02 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
To: zeugma
sooner or later the stench would draw flies, and then someone would notice.
we are being too harsh - surely there are some employed in that bureau who are worthy servants of the public trust.
12
posted on
12/30/2005 7:05:28 AM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: Eaker
Would you post some of the important information as the dial-up crowd may not be able to download the 20.06 MB file. I think you just did. Dial up download time, about an hour.
Heck it took me nearly a minute! ;)
Off to read....
13
posted on
12/30/2005 7:05:33 AM PST
by
kAcknor
(Don't flatter yourself.... It is a gun in my pocket.)
To: Eaker; Chode
dang... forgot to ping you two.
sorry.
need... more... coffee...
14
posted on
12/30/2005 7:06:46 AM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: King Prout
"does this document provide fodder for the repeal/dissolution of the BATFE itself?" I'm afraid that the ATF is far too useful a tool in the gradual militarization of our police forces from the federal level on down to let that happen.
Business as usual, unless we get really lucky.
15
posted on
12/30/2005 7:10:58 AM PST
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
To: Eaker
I'm on dialup as well... If one of you guys that has a faster connection wants to post the text, please do.
One other thing, the OIG is currently putting together an audit of the NFRTR... this is a line by line audit that will bring out every single error in the estimated 2.4 million registrations in the system.
The BATF can no longer hide behind their little curtain. The wizard is about to be exposed.
Mike
16
posted on
12/30/2005 7:15:20 AM PST
by
BCR #226
To: Lurker
17
posted on
12/30/2005 7:19:48 AM PST
by
righthand man
(WE'RE SOUTHERN AND PROUD OF IT)
To: BCR #226
There is no truth to the rumor that the BATFE SWAT team has pop-up targets mounted on beds at their target range.
They're actually in the building entry team live fire facility, and called 'Posturpedic Poppers'.
18
posted on
12/30/2005 7:20:22 AM PST
by
FreedomFarmer
(I should be castrating hogs, but I got boared.)
To: King Prout
we are being too harsh - surely there are some employed in that bureau who are worthy servants of the public trust.Perhaps, but I doubt it. The problems with this out of control agency are widely known. Anyone decent wouldn't want to be affiliated with them.
19
posted on
12/30/2005 7:23:47 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
To: Lurker
The first rule of a bureaucrat is "Never disturb a body at rest."
The second, "If I don't do anything, I can't do anything wrong."
The third, "When in doubt, mumble."
20
posted on
12/30/2005 7:27:28 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson