Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Security Forces Progress Leads to Changing Coalition Role
Defend America News ^ | Dec 28, 2005 | Army Gen. George W. Casey Jr.

Posted on 12/29/2005 3:32:48 PM PST by SandRat

BAGHDAD, Iraq, Dec. 28, 2005 — Last week Iraqi Prime Minister al-Ja'fari, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, and I announced the decision not to deploy two brigades scheduled to come to Iraq early next year. The 1st Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, based out of Fort Riley, Kansas, was originally scheduled to deploy to central Iraq in December to replace the 29th Brigade Combat Team. Additionally, the Baumholder, Germany-based 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division, was to deploy to the Iraqi province of Diyala in November to replace the 1st Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division. The 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division will remain in Kuwait to serve as a "call-forward force," ready to deploy into Iraq should security conditions dictate. The decision, affecting approximately 7,000 U.S. active-duty soldiers, was based on the cumulative impact of the Iraqi Security Forces across the country. Specifically, two successful elections and a referendum on the Constitution were key to advancing the political process; the growth and increased capability of the 216,000 strong ISF; and the operational success across Iraq, especially in restoration of control of the borders. All of these events together allowed Coalition Forces to begin the transition to a supporting role.

This is a significant decision, and it is a step toward acknowledging sufficient ISF capability in maintaining domestic order. Not only is it a demonstration of respect for ISF capability, but it demonstrates our commitment to honor the pledge "as they stand up, we will stand down.

Although the ISF is gaining strength and capability, they will continue to be supported. Coalition Forces will still be required to provide support to ISF security operations and to lead independent operations against the insurgents who remain committed to disrupting the democratic political development of Iraq.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: changing; coalition; forces; gnfi; iraq; iraqi; iraqisecurity; leads; procoalition; progress; role; security; to

1 posted on 12/29/2005 3:32:51 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HiJinx; Spiff; Da Jerdge; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; freekitty; ...

PING!


2 posted on 12/29/2005 3:33:12 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

We'll see...


3 posted on 12/29/2005 3:35:32 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Can't wait to hear the Rats trying to take credit for this.

"Our pressure on The President is working" ...they wish.

4 posted on 12/29/2005 3:36:08 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ducks1944; Ragtime Cowgirl; Alamo-Girl; TrueBeliever9; maestro; TEXOKIE; My back yard; djreece; ...
Last week Iraqi Prime Minister al-Ja'fari, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, and I announced the decision not to deploy two brigades scheduled to come to Iraq early next year. The 1st Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, based out of Fort Riley, Kansas, was originally scheduled to deploy to central Iraq in December to replace the 29th Brigade Combat Team. Additionally, the Baumholder, Germany-based 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division, was to deploy to the Iraqi province of Diyala in November to replace the 1st Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division. The 2nd Brigade, 1st Armored Division will remain in Kuwait to serve as a "call-forward force," ready to deploy into Iraq should security conditions dictate. The decision, affecting approximately 7,000 U.S. active-duty soldiers, was based on the cumulative impact of the Iraqi Security Forces across the country.
5 posted on 12/29/2005 10:10:35 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks for the ping!


6 posted on 12/29/2005 10:59:37 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
This is a significant decision, and it is a step toward acknowledging sufficient ISF capability in maintaining domestic order. Not only is it a demonstration of respect for ISF capability, but it demonstrates our commitment to honor the pledge "as they stand up, we will stand down.

This is what they have been saying repeatedly since 2003. The dumocrats and MSM hear it but refuse to acknowledge it. It doesn't fit the agenda they are pushing. The agenda that will blow up in their face, I hope and pray.

7 posted on 12/30/2005 6:36:13 AM PST by SwatTeam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson