"I know what I am, but what are you?"
It may look that way to someone who refuses to learn anything from it. It is, nonetheless, correct, and your childish retorts do nothing to refute its contents.
Again, your contempt for creationists is a tad obvious.
I have no respect for anyone who actively resists learning about a topic he insists upon lecturing about using fallacies and misrepresentations. Unfortunately, that includes a very large percentage of anti-evolution creationits
You use the word "creationist" like a KKK cultist would say the word nig...r.
No, I don't, but thanks for sharing your ugly slurs with us -- it makes it quite clear to the lurkers who actually is driven by "contempt" here.
I'm sorry to say your zealotry leaves you with no scientific knowledge but a re-play of the evolutionary talking points that have no basis in scientific laws.
ROFL!!! Do you expect anyone to actually fall for that?
Is this kind of bitter diatribe, devoid of any discussion of the actual science, and full of desperate excuses for *not* responding to the actual points we make, the best you can do?
Yes, I suppose it is.
Again, you have said absolutely nothing. You insist on slurring me because I dare compare your condemnation of creationists with the KKK's condemnation of African-Americans. (is that PC?) Your insistence that evolutionary theory does not conflict with the laws of thermodynamics is non-science. Again, you may defend it all you want but it is you who needs to step back and study some more and free yourself from unscientific cultish responses.
"I know what I am, but what are you?"