Guess what? Your post had absolutely nothing NEW or TRUE to say. Again, your contempt for creationists is a tad obvious. You use the word "creationist" like a KKK cultist would say the word nig...r. I'm sorry to say your zealotry leaves you with no scientific knowledge but a re-play of the evolutionary talking points that have no basis in scientific laws.
It may look that way to someone who refuses to learn anything from it. It is, nonetheless, correct, and your childish retorts do nothing to refute its contents.
Again, your contempt for creationists is a tad obvious.
I have no respect for anyone who actively resists learning about a topic he insists upon lecturing about using fallacies and misrepresentations. Unfortunately, that includes a very large percentage of anti-evolution creationits
You use the word "creationist" like a KKK cultist would say the word nig...r.
No, I don't, but thanks for sharing your ugly slurs with us -- it makes it quite clear to the lurkers who actually is driven by "contempt" here.
I'm sorry to say your zealotry leaves you with no scientific knowledge but a re-play of the evolutionary talking points that have no basis in scientific laws.
ROFL!!! Do you expect anyone to actually fall for that?
Is this kind of bitter diatribe, devoid of any discussion of the actual science, and full of desperate excuses for *not* responding to the actual points we make, the best you can do?
Yes, I suppose it is.
You wrote: Guess what? Your post had absolutely nothing NEW or TRUE to say. Again, your contempt for creationists is a tad obvious. You use the word "creationist" like a KKK cultist would say the word nig...r. I'm sorry to say your zealotry leaves you with no scientific knowledge but a re-play of the evolutionary talking points that have no basis in scientific laws.
Reply:
I am not sure of your point. Nobody with any scientific knowledge believes that Noah's Flood actually happened. ID does not support the flood. ID actively dismisses Genesis and suggests an alternative 'Creator'. ID rejects Christ as Saviour, a cheap bargain for you to argue against science.