Replies

A question like that could only come from one too lazy to study God's word sufficiently to understand it, and to take recognition of the massive amount of numeric evidence in the word to prove that only God could be it's author.

Straw man, non-sequiteur, begging the question.

I need to get a tote board to keep up with all the logical fallacies used.

In a scientific discussion, saying "'cause God made it so" has the same casual relationship as a voodoo doctor making it rain.

I will say it again. As an argument, God belongs in mythology, not science.

btw: I am a Christian and devoutly believe in God and His Son, who died for our sins. And anyone that watches evolution unfold and doesn't see the Glory of God is looking but not seeing.

"As an argument, God belongs in mythology, not science"

The 'logic' of a fool.

Had you not been too lazy to study, you might be aware of the thousands of numeric patterns woven into the word. It has been studied, even by the Pentagon cryptologists hoping to disprove it, to no avail. The ignorant will continue to make statements like yours.

btw: I am a Christian and devoutly believe in God and His Son, who died for our sins.

And anyone that watches evolution unfold and doesn't see the Glory of God is looking but not seeing.

Ok...

Most Christians 'believe' Evolution because they do NOT know what their Bible says. If, as they say, they 'believe' the words of Jesus and then of the New Testament writers, they have to decide what the following verses mean:

Romans 5:12-21
12. Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned--
13. for before the law was given, sin was in the world. But sin is not taken into account when there is no law.
14. Nevertheless, death reigned from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin by breaking a command, as did Adam, who was a pattern of the one to come.
15. But the gift is not like the trespass. For if the many died by the trespass of the one man, how much more did God's grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, overflow to the many!
16. Again, the gift of God is not like the result of the one man's sin: The judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation, but the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification.
17. For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive God's abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ.
18. Consequently, just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men, so also the result of one act of righteousness was justification that brings life for all men.
19. For just as through the disobedience of the one man, the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.
20. The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more,
21. so that, just as sin reigned in death, so also grace might reign through righteousness to bring eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

If there were no one man, that means SIN did NOT enter the World thru him.

If Adam was NOT the one man, that means SPIRITUAL DEATH did not come thru him.

If SIN did NOT enter the World thru the one man, that means Jesus does not save from SIN.

Are we to believe that the one man is symbolic? Does that mean Jesus is symbolic as well?

The Theory of Evolution states that there WAS no one man, but a wide population that managed to inherit that last mutated gene that makes MEN different from APES.

1 Timothy 2:13

For Adam was formed first, then Eve. Was Paul WRONG about this???