A question like that could only come from one too lazy to study God's word sufficiently to understand it, and to take recognition of the massive amount of numeric evidence in the word to prove that only God could be it's author.
You have made yourself, intellectually speaking, a pool of frozen 'primordial soup.' (mud)
You wrote: "So, how do your "probability calculations" allow for you to exist when the probability is infinitesimally small?"
"A question like that could only come from one too lazy to study God's word sufficiently to understand it, and to take recognition of the massive amount of numeric evidence in the word to prove that only God could be it's author.
"You have made yourself, intellectually speaking, a pool of frozen 'primordial soup.' (mud)"
Reply:
Laughing out loud. In fact, ROTFLOL. This is a keeper.
Your post is the perfect demonstration that ID has nothing to do with science and is all about "proof of God" and {poofs}. This is exactly why ID has failed.
Actually, I am quite happy that our species evolved and that I am here to enjoy the pleasures thereof.
Straw man, non-sequiteur, begging the question.
I need to get a tote board to keep up with all the logical fallacies used.
In a scientific discussion, saying "'cause God made it so" has the same casual relationship as a voodoo doctor making it rain.
I will say it again. As an argument, God belongs in mythology, not science.
btw: I am a Christian and devoutly believe in God and His Son, who died for our sins. And anyone that watches evolution unfold and doesn't see the Glory of God is looking but not seeing.