Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDGING THE CASE FOR WAR (Chicago Tribune's Inquest Finds That Bush DID NOT LIE!)
Chicago Tribune ^ | 12/28/05

Posted on 12/28/2005 7:07:14 AM PST by areafiftyone

Did President Bush intentionally mislead this nation and its allies into war? Or is it his critics who have misled Americans, recasting history to discredit him and his policies? If your responses are reflexive and self-assured, read on.

On Nov. 20, the Tribune began an inquest: We set out to assess the Bush administration's arguments for war in Iraq. We have weighed each of those nine arguments against the findings of subsequent official investigations by the 9/11 Commission, the Senate Intelligence Committee and others. We predicted that this exercise would distress the smug and self-assured--those who have unquestioningly supported, or opposed, this war.

The matrix below summarizes findings from the resulting nine editorials. We have tried to bring order to a national debate that has flared for almost three years. Our intent was to help Tribune readers judge the case for war--based not on who shouts loudest, but on what actually was said and what happened.

The administration didn't advance its arguments with equal emphasis. Neither, though, did its case rely solely on Iraq's alleged illicit weapons. The other most prominent assertion in administration speeches and presentations was as accurate as the weapons argument was flawed: that Saddam Hussein had rejected 12 years of United Nations demands that he account for his stores of deadly weapons--and also stop exterminating innocents. Evaluating all nine arguments lets each of us decide which ones we now find persuasive or empty, and whether President Bush tried to mislead us.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushlied; iraq; prewarintelligence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Chi-townChief

I know. I was kinda disappointed in that.


21 posted on 12/28/2005 9:08:51 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kalee

bookmark for later


22 posted on 12/28/2005 9:25:43 AM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Must be a mistake.


23 posted on 12/28/2005 1:32:36 PM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

btt


24 posted on 12/28/2005 1:44:42 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (I've lost my tagline and don't know where to find it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I'm saddened that this piece didn't get nearly the amount of discussion here and exposure elsewhere that it deserves. While I don't agree with everything in it, this is a great example of how a media outlet should work: It takes the reasons for war, and one by one examines them in light of what we know now.

I wish this piece had been the subject for discussion on Softball and those other shows, but it seems to have come and gone with nary a ripple.

25 posted on 01/24/2006 7:34:11 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/#quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson