Teaching ID in the schools is akin to teaching girls that babies are brought by a stork. If stork birth were included in school health classes would there be outrage?
Of course. ID is the same.
Aristotle - you remember the famous Greek philosopher, a man of science and reason ? - wrote, long before the existence of the Bible and Genesis, that there was a First (or Prime) Mover. If you haven't ever read any of Aristotle's "Physics", he observed that movement of one body acts and moves another body, but that this had a beginning, which he posited as the Prime Mover.
Get a life, folks. ID, evolution or the First Mover are only theories about how life started and developed. All have their pros and cons. Evolution is not a slam-dunk, and nor is ID. They are simply theories or ways to describe what we think may have happened based on some types of observations.
Teaching ID in the schools is akin to teaching girls that babies are brought by a stork. If stork birth were included in school health classes would there be outrage?
Actually this is a lousy analogy. One can prove over and over that babies are born instead of being brought by storks just by spending a weekend in a birthing room at a hospital. One cannot prove that ID is wrong. There is no birthing room. No proof that it is wrong.