Posted on 12/27/2005 7:59:59 PM PST by FairOpinion
Just the same way they had the Enron perp walks, we need some traitor perp walks as examples to others, with swift trials and 30-year jail sentences.
FBI Filegate was a far more intrusive, far more obviously illegal violation of the privacy of American citizens than anything alledged against the Bush Administration. Yet thos who condemn Bush for investigating terrorists allowed President Clinton to announce that Craig Livingstone "was fired" (note the passive voice) without demanding that Clinton at least assign responsibility for the hiring (and thus, of the firing) of Livingstone.Imagine President Bush evading responsibility for hiring a perpetrator of hundreds of felonies like that! Imagine Bush getting away with not even prosecuting him!!
Best Selling Book on Amazon.com, Do As I Say (Not As I Do), Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy, by Peter Schweizer.
If you go to the chapter on Ted Kennedy, read past the Kennedy family trust set up by Grandpa Joe in Fiji to avoid taxes on the Chicago Merchandise Mart (p. 80-81). Then read past the Kennedy opposition to the US Army Corp. of Engineers approved Cape (Cod) Wind Project to harvest free alternative energy and end The Capes coal pollution and related health problems, a project also opposed by other liberal residents Walter Cronkite and historian David McCullough....
Kennedys own some oil companies themselves: Arctic oil, despite the name, drilling in Texas and Oklahoma. Kenoil and Mokeen Oil. In 1985, Kennedy converted these two companies to Royalty Trusts, thus avoiding paying any corporate taxes, windfall or otherwise (see p. 92 of Do As I Say (Not As I Do)). The Kennedys also have oil deposits in Louisiana, as well as mineral rights on properties in Alabama, Florida and Mississippi.....
Much of the land was accumulated by convincing poor rural black farmers to give away their mineral rights, not knowing what it meant. The Kennedys set the operation up as a Royalty Trust to avoid paying income and corporate taxes on the profits. Family members including Ted Kennedy, environmentalist Robert Kennedy, Jr., and Joe Kennedy, Jr. receive checks every year.
Sen. Kennedy has $500 million in trusts based in Jamaica, Cayman Islands, and the bulk of it in Fiji. The Kennedy oil company operating in five states, once called Kenn Oil, is now named The Arctic Oil Royalty Trust. George Soros "holds the bulk of his billions in tax-free overseas accounts."
I just found another great article, that is a "must read":
All the news that's fit to ignore
Dec 26, 2005
by Michael Barone
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/michaelbarone/2005/12/26/180370.html
What the Times didn't bother telling its readers is that this practice is far from new and is entirely legal. Instead, the unspoken subtext of the story was that this was likely an illegal and certainly a very scary invasion of Americans' rights.
Let's put the issue very simply. The president has the power as commander in chief under the Constitution to intercept and monitor the communications of America's enemies. Indeed, it would be a very weird interpretation of the Constitution to say that the commander in chief could order U.S. forces to kill America's enemies but not to wiretap -- or, more likely these days, electronically intercept -- their communications. Presidents have asserted and exercised this power repeatedly and consistently over the last quarter-century.
The Constitution, Justice Robert Jackson famously wrote, should not be interpreted in a way that makes it "a suicide pact." The notion that terrorists' privacy must be respected when they place a cell-phone call to someone in the United States is in the nature of a suicide pact. The Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches and seizures in the United States should not be stretched into a ban on interceptions of communications from America's enemies abroad.
SIGINT troopers: the tip of the spear.
OT -
Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy, a Democrat, accepted two free trips. One was from Fort Lauderdale, Fla. to Taiwan and back to the United States via Los Angeles between Jan. 4 and Jan. 7, 2004. Kennedy's office said the Chinese International Cooperation Association reimbursed him $3,400 for transportation on that trip, $930 for lodging and $370 for meals.
Kennedy's office said the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society reimbursed him $156 for lodging at the group's annual conference in Orlando, Fla., on Feb. 25 and 26. Kennedy's office said he traveled to the conference on a plane chartered by the health-care group. His office set the value of the ride at $11,243.49.
Rep. James R. Langevin, a Democrat, took a trip to Taiwan from Dec. 1 to 4 last year, paid for by the Chinese International Economic Association. Langevin's office said he was reimbursed $3,500 for travel, $970 for lodging and $370 for meals.
snip
Republican Sen. Lincoln D. Chafee, while reporting no free trips or outside income in 1994, gave a glimpse at his family holdings through the annual disclosure,
snip
Chafee's 2004 report again confirms what he first revealed after he was appointed to the Senate in 1999: his family estate is much larger than that of his late father, by virtue of his marriage to the former Stephanie B. Danforth.
Chafee's report shows that, counting the trusts of Stephanie Chafee and their children, his family fortune exceeds $61 million. But because of the quirks of the disclosure system, the report tells little about the estate's value.
For example, Stephanie Chafee's principal blind trust is valued at "over $1,000,000." Because the trust is his wife's, Chafee is not obliged to fix its worth more specifically. But in his first such report several years ago, Chafee valued this trust of Stephanie Chafee at more than $50 million -- still accurate today, Chafee spokesman Stephen Hourahan confirmed.
snip
Kennedy also lists among his assets a holding worth between $50,001 and $100,000 in Arctic Royalty Limited, which owns oil and gas royalty interests. Kennedy reports having earned between $15,001 and $50,000 last year from Arctic.
http://tinyurl.com/7oj4d
Its certainly a said state of affairs...so do you believe that they are THAT dumb, or do they REALLY know who they REALLY are in that regard?
Treason = hanging. I would not batt an eye. None of this 30 years and out in 10 nonsense.
We have troops under fire.
Watch Bush's numbers continue to go UP as media complains that he is playing hardball with terrorists. Even manyof the Moonbats get it.
Oh sure, these people are traitors, no doubt about it. In the good old days (and not that long ago), they would have been tried and shot. United we stand, divided we turn into Mexico.
Not to defend the Tribune, but could spies or moles have accounted for that knowledge (in principle) just as effectively?
Cheers!
...and Merry Christmas!
Here's another example ... where ships were actually sunk because of careless Congressman and press.
"A serious breach of security may have helped the Japanese anti-submarine forces. In June 1943, Congressman Andrew Jackson May, a sixty-eight-year-old member of the House Military Affairs Committee returning from a war zone junket, gave a press interview during which he said, in effect, Don't worry about our submariners; the Japanese are setting their depth charges too shallow. Incredibly, the press associations sent this story over their wires, and many newspapers, including one in Honolulu, thoughtlessly published it.
"Lockwood and his staff were appalled--and furious--at this stupid revelation. Lockwood wrote Admiral Edwards in acid words, "I hear ... Congressman May ... said the Jap depth charges ... are not set deep enough. ... He would be pleased to know the Japs set'em deeper now." And after the war, Lockwood wrote, 'I consider that indiscretion cost us ten submarines and 800 officers and men.'"
"Silent Victory" - Clay Blair. Vol.1 pg 397
Jack
Yes, of course - and IIRC the US did try to subtly promote that cover story. But it is so valuable to have your enemy be lax on signal intelligence that the idea that you are "reading his mail" must be minimized by all means possible.E.g., the British had a policy of never overtly acting on Ultra - there always had to be a cover story for whatever they did. If Ultra told them a German convoy was headed toward Rommel's supply port, they were not to simply send out the bombers - they were first to "accidentally" find the convoy with a recon flight, and only then send the bombers after it. In extremis, they got permission to violate that rule once - and then they promoted the story that a spy had tipped them off. But you just don't want to do that every day.
Again, the British had turned all the agents Germany had sent to England and were using them to send disinformation back to Germany. If a V-1 hit to the north of London, the double agents were ordered to indicate that it had landed to the south, in order to induce the Germans to "correct" their aim. But at the same time they were inducing the Germans to aim in a particular direction, the British refused to allow their agents to evacuate their own families from the area they were spoofing the Germans toward. To avoid the possibility of the Germans' getting wind of it.
You want to say nothing at all about sigint, one way or another. So it's a delicate situation when a newspaper insists on bringing the topic to the fore.
Wall. Cigarettes. Blindfolds.
(We're going to need a LONG wall.)
bookmark
So where is the outrage?? Where are the Republican leaders?? They should be screaming from the tops of their lungs for an investigation. So where are they, these meek and mild Republicans?
The Rats are having a field day with their side of the story. the NSA secrets exposed, Able Danger/911 commission whitewash, the Plame farce, the oil for food scam, etc, etc.
IMHO, this current group of Republican leaders SUCK !!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.