PS: Is it a coincidence that they made this double the old minimum move only after tightening bankruptcy laws?
I think not.
To: No Blue States
A similar article was posted here a while ago, and a Freeper pointed out that the banks were opposed to this measure. They'd rather have their customers pay off a $5000 balance over 50 years than over 10 years.
63 posted on
12/27/2005 8:05:17 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(Said the night wind to the little lamb . . . "Do you see what I see?")
To: No Blue States
PS: Is it a coincidence that they made this double the old minimum move only after tightening bankruptcy laws? I think not.If there is a point to those two statements, it eluded me...
106 posted on
12/27/2005 9:06:17 AM PST by
Publius6961
(The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson