If there is a point to those two statements, it eluded me...
"PS: Is it a coincidence that they made this double the old minimum move only after tightening bankruptcy laws? I think not.
If there is a point to those two statements, it eluded me..."
My point was that if they did this before the bankruptcy laws were tightened the doubling of minimum payments would likely cause some people in deep debt to file for banruptcy.
The ultimate point was the laws were written to benefit the cc companies, and give them a circuit subsidy.