Enough said? This is considered running a paper into the ground.....which is liberally OK.....
Posted on 12/27/2005 4:12:46 AM PST by NJRighty
Has The New York Times declared itself to be on the front line in the war against the War on Terror?
The self-styled paper of record seems to be trying to reclaim the loyalty of those radical lefties who ludicrously accused it of uncritically reporting on Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.
Yet the paper has done more than merely try to embarrass the Bush administration these last few months.
It has published classified information — and thereby knowingly blown the covers of secret programs and agencies engaged in combating the terrorist threat.
The most notorious example was the paper's disclosure some 10 days ago that, since 9/11, the Bush administration has "secretly" engaged in warrantless eavesdropping on U.S.-based international phone calls and e-mails.
It's not secret anymore, of course — though the folks who reacted to the naming of Valerie Plame as a CIA operative aren't exactly shrieking for another grand jury investigation.
On the contrary: Democrats and their news-media allies — particularly on CNN and CBS — are openly suggesting that the president committed an impeachable offense and could (read: should) be removed from office.
In fact, the Times managed only to blow the lid off of what President Bush rightly calls "a vital tool in our war against the terrorists" — one that already has uncovered several terrorist plots.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
After what the NYTimes did, I'm surprised they still have any advertisers. Any company that continues to advertise in the NYTimes should be considered just as treasonous as the Times itself.
Are these people trying to kill me?
The Gray Lady is no lady, she is an old whore , her pimps are the Democrat party. She is selling out America for the terrorists just as the Democrats are doing.
"After what the NYTimes did, I'm surprised they still have any advertisers. Any company that continues to advertise in the NYTimes should be considered just as treasonous as the Times itself."
Get a list of advertisers and we boycott them. Easiest way.
Did any terrorists seriously entertain the thought that Bush was NOT doing any of the stuff that has been so hysterically spilled? Remember they come from countries that would slay you if you looked at a picture of Mohammed crosswise.
I guess the term "Loose lips sinks ships" doesn't resonate over there anymore.
Enough said? This is considered running a paper into the ground.....which is liberally OK.....
Yeah, but it's not personal; it's Bush's fault.
TOYS? TOYS? How about COMMITS Treason!
Why do we even QUOTE the NY Times here on FreeRepublic? The Old Gray Hag should be bird doo-doo paper non grata.
Don't worry. Next the NYTimes will demand a public subsidy!
good idea:and let's let the advertisers know we are boycotting them and why.
Thanks..I was about to post the chart..I*t's the FR rules....like every time a Maureen Dowd thread goes up, we get a pic of Caterine Zeta-Jones...or pics of Ann Coulter with hwr columns...howver, sadly, since she has stopped playing competitive tennis..we no longer get pics of Anna Kournikova..
Can someone post a list of advertisers? I would make calls and send emails to any advertiser in the NYTimes.
The Slimes just ran an ad on Fox.
Should say It has published legally protected classified information — and thereby knowingly blown the covers of secret programs and agencies engaged in combating the terrorist threat.
****
The old established/liberal/socialist media is America's most ruthless, relentless, and destructive enemy.
It never ends....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.