Skip to comments.
Overheads take up to 1/3 of tsunami funds (UN squanders relief money)
UPI ^
| 12/23/05
Posted on 12/26/2005 6:03:52 AM PST by jalisco555
NEW YORK, Dec. 23 (UPI) -- Up to about a third of the $590 million U.N. fund spent for the Indian Ocean tsunami relief may have gone to pay for overhead.
The Financial Times says its two-month investigation showed the money appears to have been spent on administration, staff and related costs. The $590 million was part of the United Nation's $1.1 billion disaster flash appeal.
The newspaper also found several U.N. agencies continue to refuse to disclose details of their relief expenditure in spite of earlier pledges of transparency by senior officials.
The flash appeal covered the money donated by governments to the world body in the first weeks after the disaster to fund the early aid work, the Times reported.
The newspaper said details of that appeal it obtained from U.N. agencies such as the World Health Organization and the World Food Program showed 18 percent to 32 percent of the expenditure related to staff, administration and other costs.
Some agencies say non-profit aid organizations should claim no more than 10 percent of project funds for administration costs, the report said.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corruption; crooks; fivestarhotels; oilforkofi; sumatraquake; tsunami; un; uncorruption; uncrooks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
In the UN's defense it should be noted that 5-star hotels and catered lunches don't come cheap.
To: jalisco555
2
posted on
12/26/2005 6:07:56 AM PST
by
neodad
(Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
To: jalisco555
I believe these were normal UN "opportunity costs."
To: jalisco555
wow thats awesome only 1/3 they are doing great
4
posted on
12/26/2005 6:09:45 AM PST
by
Flavius
(Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: jalisco555
Is bjclinton in charge of this money pot?
To: Flavius
wow thats awesome only 1/3 they are doing greatI don't know, I think Kofi's losing his touch. In the old days the "overhead" would be 50%.
6
posted on
12/26/2005 6:11:24 AM PST
by
jalisco555
("The right to bear weapons is the right to be free." A. E. Van Vogt)
To: jalisco555
In the movie Casablanca the owner of the Blue Parrot referred to them has "carrying charges".
7
posted on
12/26/2005 6:12:59 AM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
I believe these were normal UN "opportunity costs."Where I grew up in NJ some of my friends would talk about obtaining items that "fell off a truck". I think those guys grew up to become UN officials.
8
posted on
12/26/2005 6:13:44 AM PST
by
jalisco555
("The right to bear weapons is the right to be free." A. E. Van Vogt)
To: Just mythoughts
Is bjclinton in charge of this money pot?If not then any fund he is in charge of should be routinely audited.
9
posted on
12/26/2005 6:14:52 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: neodad
See, the NY Times and the networks won't cover this very much, because there isn't a Karl Rove-Dick Cheney-George Bush connection.
To: jalisco555
It's quite natural for short people to have high overhead.
11
posted on
12/26/2005 6:16:00 AM PST
by
auboy
To: jalisco555
United Nations AKA the World Wide Mafia...
12
posted on
12/26/2005 6:16:38 AM PST
by
tubebender
(You can't make Chicken Soup from Chicken Poop...)
To: jalisco555
We were told at the time that helicopters from U.S. Navy ships were landing and handing out relief supplies long before the UN personnel had even gotten settled in their posh hotels, let alone contributing to any aid effort.
No wonder the US military got sent away - they were making the UN bureaucrats look bad.
To: highlander_UW
A little walking around money.
14
posted on
12/26/2005 6:16:58 AM PST
by
hershey
To: jalisco555
What?! The UN wasting money on administration, staff and related costs? That's odd. I'll have to watch tha whorld newz tanite on tha tee veee to hear the complete story.
15
posted on
12/26/2005 6:18:06 AM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: jalisco555
16
posted on
12/26/2005 6:20:30 AM PST
by
pointsal
To: jalisco555
This is why I don't give to any public charity. I give where I see the need in my own community.
17
posted on
12/26/2005 6:20:33 AM PST
by
tiki
To: highlander_UW
The "United Way" doesn't have a very good record of spending the money donated to them going to what was intended. Plus they donate to many left-wing causes. They'll never get another dime from me.
18
posted on
12/26/2005 6:20:59 AM PST
by
Beagle8U
(An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
To: jalisco555
And they still don't pay parking tickets in NYC. What a bunch of a**hats.
19
posted on
12/26/2005 6:21:31 AM PST
by
varyouga
(I no longer fear death. I only fear the day when the DUmmies take over.)
To: jalisco555
Wow, almost as bad as the US government.
20
posted on
12/26/2005 6:21:36 AM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(Vote for gridlock)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson