Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Thank you Jimmy Carter”--Carter Agrees With Bush Spying
The New York Times ^ | November 8, 1980 | Robert Pear

Posted on 12/23/2005 11:23:24 AM PST by SBD1

U.S.OFFICIALS DEFINE POLICY ON SEARCHES; Lawyers Assert President Still Has 'Inherent Authority' to Order Entries Without Warrants 'Concurrent Jurisdiction' 1978 Executive Order Cited No 'Foreign Connections' Found By ROBERT PEAR Special to The New York Times. New York Times (1857-Current file). New York, N.Y.: Nov 9, 1980. pg. 35, 1 pgs

WASHINGTON, Nov. 8--Justice Department lawyers say that the President still has the "inherent authority" to order searches without warrants to collect foreign intelligence within the United States, despite the criminal conviction this week of two former officials of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who said they had approved such searches in 1972 and 1973.

An executive order issued by President Carter in January 1978 established the standard that governs the use of searches for intelligence purposes today. Such searches, it said, ‘’shall not be undertaken against a United States person without a judicial warrant, unless the President has authorized the type of activity involved and the Attorney General has both approved the particular activity and determined that there is probable cause to believe that the United States person is an agent of a foreign power.'’

SBD

(Excerpt) Read more at pqasb.pqarchiver.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: carter; fisa; gwot; homelandsecurity; jimmycarter; nsa; patriotleak; spying; terrorism; thankyou; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
"..only one other president judged as more despicable."

heh..wonder who that will be?? ;-)

81 posted on 12/23/2005 6:01:39 PM PST by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Exactly!
All this does is to give Jimmy Carter the Megaphone
so that he can speak to the Moonbat Hordes! And
once again he (Jimmy C) will become the Moonbat Messiah..

"..he had the Authority, but he didn't use it right",
says former president Carter..

while the crowd chanted, "Muad'Dib! Muad'Dib! Muad'Dib!"
"Save us Muad'Dib! Save us from the Evil Bush Muad'Dib!"

"Bush is Evil! Bush is Hitler! Bush is Satan!
The Economy is trashed and it is all Bush's fault!"

"No WMD and Bush causes Terrorism! He knew about
9-11 before 9-11, and he let it all happen to make his
Oil buddies rich. Muad'Dib! Muad'Dib! Muad'Dib!"

Yep..
If Carter said something nice (or true) then it is all just
a setup for the next Moonbat Messiah!


82 posted on 12/23/2005 6:17:24 PM PST by Klinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: inquest


Don't you find this satisfactory?


Assistant Attorney General's Letters to Senate Intelligence Committee Regarding NSA Spying Program

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1545787/posts


83 posted on 12/23/2005 6:24:31 PM PST by FairOpinion (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

If Jimma can overcome his slide into senility for a few moments to ponder the situation, he will say that this is a different situation since the people we are looking at are Muzzles and everyone knows that they are members of the Religion of Peace. Even though he has lusted in his heart, he knows that these people never have and that they are holy people who mean us no harm and it is an insult to all that is good to suspect them of any evil, including wanting to blow all our a$$e$ off the face of the earth as soon as they can.

No, thank you, Jimma Carter. Go plant your nuts in the back 40.


84 posted on 12/23/2005 6:32:57 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
That link still doesn't deal with the issue of probable cause.

I wasn't trying to examine every aspect of the controversy surrounding the program on this thread - just that one aspect.

85 posted on 12/23/2005 7:10:34 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

Comment #86 Removed by Moderator

To: inquest

Don't you think finding people's phone number and e-mail address on computers of known terrorists is probable cause?

Those are the kinds of things that prompted the surveillance.


87 posted on 12/23/2005 7:12:18 PM PST by FairOpinion (Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Don't you think finding people's phone number and e-mail address on computers of known terrorists is probable cause?

The argument can go either way, given that, as Kristol and Schmitt pointed out (in defending the program, not criticizing it - see #20), even terrorists call people for non-terrorism-related activity, such as renting rooms, making purchases, etc.

I'm not saying that it's not justified to tap those numbers, nor am I saying that it's necessarily illegal. I'm only saying that may not meet the probable-cause standard. And if that's the case, then the Carter-era EO doesn't provide a precedent for this program, contrary to the thread's claim that it does. That's my only point.

88 posted on 12/23/2005 7:23:32 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.


89 posted on 12/23/2005 7:41:12 PM PST by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest

"I'm only saying that may not meet the probable-cause standard. And if that's the case, then the Carter-era EO doesn't provide a precedent for this program,"

So, DO you think he broke the law?


90 posted on 12/23/2005 7:47:08 PM PST by amutr22 (....not ANOTHER clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

To hell with J.C. lousy pres, loud mouth, bitchy old lady , crazy mother,drunk brother. a disfunctional family


91 posted on 12/23/2005 8:19:19 PM PST by reefdiver (Demo rats = surrender monkees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
FISA specifically has a section, which says you don't need to go through FISA, i.e. the President has the executive power to order the searches.

That would be section 1802, and it doesn't say that the President "don't need to go through FISA". The section spells out specific procedures that need to be followed--minimization, certification to the court, etc.

That section has nothing to do with what Bush has been doing, btw. Bush's surveillance has not adhered to FISA's requirements, including section 1802. Bush has admitted it and his lawyers have been defending it. That's what's this uproar is all about. Referring to the law which he's ignoring in order to justify his ignoring the law is senseless.

92 posted on 12/23/2005 8:31:04 PM PST by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

I think it's worth pointing out that the referenced E.O. predates FISA. After FISA became law, Carter amended the E.O. so that electronic surveillance would thereafter be
conducted in accordance FISA.


93 posted on 12/23/2005 8:40:47 PM PST by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

I have not read all of the posts but I was over at that other site and this has made their news. I did not read anything but the headlines.


94 posted on 12/23/2005 8:43:31 PM PST by MamaB (mom to an Angel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

I'm no Carter fan but he sure isn't sliding into senility.

He's old,as I am,but certainly not senile.

Knock it off.


95 posted on 12/23/2005 8:49:08 PM PST by Mears (The Killer Queen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Grand Voyageur
Anyway, Old Jimmy doesn't seem like too much of a threat anymore. The guy's like 80 something.

He's a threat only because the left-wing hysterical media prints his garbage and treasonous comments all over the news and gives weight to commie/left-wing/hate-Bush comments as a "respected ex-president". I could care less what Jimmah says or thinks, but he is one more cog in the left-wing demagoguery to either neutralize or bring down the Bush presidency. Plus he LOVES his favorite commie dictators like Castro, Caesar Chavez, and the other commies taking over in other SA countries. He is a true RAT B@ST@RD and traitor of the U.S.

96 posted on 12/23/2005 8:49:10 PM PST by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: amutr22
So, DO you think he broke the law?

To be honest, I don't even know for sure what exactly he did. If Kristol and Schmitt accurately describe the situation, then it certainly went against FISA. And I don't agree with the notion that the President's "inherent" constitutional powers shield him from acts of Congress. But apparently, the courts seem to have ruled otherwise, at least according to what some freepers have posted. I'd have to look at those rulings myself, though, to see exactly what kind of latitude they purport to give him. But my gut feeling is that his actions were illegal.

Even that doesn't necessarily mean, though, that he shouldn't have done it. Sometimes there are situations where even the law has to be set aside, as long as you're willing to accept the consequences. I don't know enough about what happened (given that most of it is classified) to really pass judgment for sure.

97 posted on 12/23/2005 10:04:46 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Peach

rhetorical question right?


98 posted on 12/23/2005 10:25:09 PM PST by wildcatf4f3 (the friend of my enemy is my enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

Looks like Enron Stock!

Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops


99 posted on 12/23/2005 10:29:23 PM PST by bray (Merry Christmas Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: penowa

i'm interested in your sources. Please post links to Cartes and commies.


100 posted on 12/23/2005 10:41:13 PM PST by wildcatf4f3 (the friend of my enemy is my enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson