Skip to comments.
Daschle: Congress Denied Bush War Powers in U.S.
Washington Post ^
| December 23, 2005
| Barton Gellman
Posted on 12/22/2005 8:50:01 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
The Bush administration requested, and Congress rejected, war-making authority "in the United States" in negotiations over the joint resolution passed days after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, according to an opinion article by former Senate majority leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.) in today's Washington Post.
Daschle's disclosure challenges a central legal argument offered by the White House in defense of the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping of U.S. citizens and permanent residents. It suggests that Congress refused explicitly to grant authority that the Bush administration now asserts is implicit in the resolution.
The Justice Department acknowledged yesterday, in a letter to Congress, that the president's October 2001 eavesdropping order did not comply with "the 'procedures' of" the law that has regulated domestic espionage since 1978. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, established a secret intelligence court and made it a criminal offense to conduct electronic surveillance without a warrant from that court, "except as authorized by statute."
There is one other statutory authority for wiretapping, which covers conventional criminal cases. That law describes itself, along with FISA, as "the exclusive means by which electronic surveillance . . . may be conducted."
Yesterday's letter, signed by Assistant Attorney General William Moschella, asserted that Congress implicitly created an exception to FISA's warrant requirement by authorizing President Bush to use military force in response to the destruction of the World Trade Center and a wing of the Pentagon. The congressional resolution of Sept. 18, 2001, formally titled "Authorization for the Use of Military Force," made no reference to surveillance or to the president's intelligence-gathering powers, and the Bush administration made no public claim of new authority until news accounts disclosed the secret NSA operation.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; congress; daschle; fisa; homelandsecurity; nsa; obstructionistdems; patriotleak; president; senate; september11; spying; terrorism; warpower; wiretaps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: West Coast Conservative
2
posted on
12/22/2005 8:52:13 PM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Green bean casserole is a culinary curse upon mankind.)
To: West Coast Conservative
This is why little Tommy Daschle now works at the Bismarck 7-11.
3
posted on
12/22/2005 8:52:25 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
To: West Coast Conservative
So let me get this straight: After 9-11, the first time we've been attacked in what everyone agrees is a new kind of war, the democrats explicitly denied the President the ability to fight that war in a new way, and wanted him to fight it as he would WW2, for example?
PLEASE run on this, Democrats!
4
posted on
12/22/2005 8:53:12 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Warning: Adult language, but great Christmas message: http://foamy.libertech.net/noxmas.swf)
To: West Coast Conservative
Didn't Daschle get fired?
5
posted on
12/22/2005 8:53:40 PM PST
by
SouthTexas
(A Merry and Blessed Christmas to all.)
To: West Coast Conservative
the Bush administration made no public claim of new authority until news accounts disclosed the secret NSA operation THAT'S BECAUSE IT WAS A SECRET!
6
posted on
12/22/2005 8:53:45 PM PST
by
aynrandfreak
(When can we stop pretending that the Left doesn't by and large hate America?)
To: Darkwolf377
BUT, they support the troops.
7
posted on
12/22/2005 8:53:51 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
To: West Coast Conservative
To: West Coast Conservative
I think that if Americans want any crap out of this loser, they'll unscrew his head and dip it out. Shut up Tommy! You're a loser. Losers don't get to play.
9
posted on
12/22/2005 8:53:57 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
To: West Coast Conservative
Well, well, well. Little Tommy's challenge to the big, bad Bush White House is factless, clueless and too, too late. You boys done lost this round, too. FDR on down been doing this kind of thing and most RATs have been doing things much looser and onerous than the current Executive. Suck it up, Tommy, your wife still has a decent job!
10
posted on
12/22/2005 8:55:21 PM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
(The problem with being a 'big tent' Party is that the clowns are seated with the paying customers.)
To: Rebelbase
Daschle is the guy who would be demanding continuing debate about war from the safety of a bomb shelter long after life above on earth was struggling to live after an attack.
To: Rebelbase
Timmy who??????
ABC CBS NBC CNN its all the SAME, Propaganda.
Might as well call them all AmeriJazerra.
Show them how much Gravitas Hugh Bris has. Vote with your remote! Shut down the Alphabet channels.
He's Got A Plan
Zippo Hero
Kill A Commie For Mommie
Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes
12
posted on
12/22/2005 9:01:43 PM PST
by
rawcatslyentist
(Why waste time learning when ignorance is instantaneous---Hobbes the Tiger)
To: Rebelbase
I bet Hillary is doing her idiot-in-the-background head-bopping thing at these comments by Daschle at this very moment.
To: msnimje
Of course they do, they just don't want them fighting. Also, they don't want them having the tools to fight terror in this country. Other than that, though, they support the troops.
I am no optimist, but I am sensing that the dems have outwitted themselves. They are explicitly making themselves out to be the Don't Fight Terrorism Party.
14
posted on
12/22/2005 9:04:21 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Warning: Adult language, but great Christmas message: http://foamy.libertech.net/noxmas.swf)
To: West Coast Conservative
What the RATS are saying is,,,,,Let us be in charge, let us run the war, let us handle the $$$$ or,,,,we'll help the enemy kill you and your kids and grandkids. we need to take them at their word on this.
15
posted on
12/22/2005 9:04:26 PM PST
by
Waco
To: Darkwolf377
This is like manna from heaven. Dipstick admits that the democrats tied the CIC's hands when this nation was a battlefield. If the republicans can't make hay with this, they are lost.
16
posted on
12/22/2005 9:05:16 PM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: Rebelbase
Deeply, deeply saddened...
...that he lost.
17
posted on
12/22/2005 9:09:14 PM PST
by
Choose Ye This Day
(Win the war. Confirm the judges. Cut the taxes. Control the spending. Secure the border.)
To: West Coast Conservative
Unless the congress adopted a constitutional amendment limiting the Presidential War Powers and it was passed by with 60 votes by the Senate then it doesn't count. The reason our Forefathers had the congress declare the war and the CIC execute the war was to keep a bunch of bureaucrats from micromanaging a war
18
posted on
12/22/2005 9:11:25 PM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: West Coast Conservative
19
posted on
12/22/2005 9:14:50 PM PST
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
To: Rebelbase
Daschle should save his sales pitches for selling those Fuller brushes.
20
posted on
12/22/2005 9:16:50 PM PST
by
jazusamo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson