Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting take on things, comments?
1 posted on 12/22/2005 7:20:15 AM PST by Abathar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Abathar

I'd also like an investigation into how many Democrats have accepted Oil For Food bribes from Saddam.


2 posted on 12/22/2005 7:21:55 AM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar

I have three suspects: Clarke, Clarke, and CLARKE!


3 posted on 12/22/2005 7:22:49 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar

What do you think are the odds? I will stake out the zero.


4 posted on 12/22/2005 7:24:14 AM PST by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar

Sounds right. I would love to see a Federal Judge frogmarched off to prison.


5 posted on 12/22/2005 7:24:52 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar

Rockefeller said he could discuss his concerns with no one because of the classified nature of the program. The NYT article said that Rockefeller had concerns about it. How would the Times know this if Rockefellers letter wasn't released until days after their article? Rockefeller sounds like the leak to me....


8 posted on 12/22/2005 7:25:13 AM PST by oneofmany (Salus populi suprema lex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar

Interesting, the media admitted that the judge didn't say why but they assumed he was resigning in protest.


16 posted on 12/22/2005 7:35:44 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar
“Judge Robertson, an activist liberal judge, probably didn’t “resign,” but rather was suspended for that very reason.”

Now THAT would be juicy...

18 posted on 12/22/2005 7:37:58 AM PST by johnny7 (“Check out the big brain on Brett!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar
The NYT put the country at risk by publishing this story. That is treason. The individuals who leaked the information also committed treason. Treason is a difficult charge on which to convict. However, proof of leaking classified information should automatically result in the removal of one's security clearance. Imagine Senator Rockefeller without security clearance.
19 posted on 12/22/2005 7:38:22 AM PST by LOC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

ping


21 posted on 12/22/2005 7:51:30 AM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar

If Rockefeller didn't leak it, he pretty certainly knows who did. He's at the epicenter of the cabal of rogue CIA agents, the DNC, and the MSM.

How about gearing up another prosecutor, only this time make it a real prosecutor instead of that preening useful idiot, Fitzgerald.

Meantime, we know exactly where to start. "Attorney General Gonzalez should subpoena Mr. Risen and Mr. Lichtblau, and have them cited for contempt of court if they do not disclose their source or sources. Maybe they could share Judy Miller’s old cell."


22 posted on 12/22/2005 7:55:43 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar
It does seem to suggest that Senator Rockefeller and ” a judge presiding over a secret court that oversees intelligence matters” were sources for this leak, Strata hints. In fact, if Strata is right, Gonzales may already know that, for Strata adds that press reports to the contrary notwithstanding, Judge Robertson, an activist liberal judge, probably didn’t “resign,” but rather was suspended for that very reason.

..Judge Robertson...TRAITOR

27 posted on 12/22/2005 8:43:30 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar
It does seem to suggest that Senator Rockefeller and ” a judge presiding over a secret court that oversees intelligence matters” were sources for this leak, Strata hints. In fact, if Strata is right, Gonzales may already know that, for Strata adds that press reports to the contrary notwithstanding, Judge Robertson, an activist liberal judge, probably didn’t “resign,” but rather was suspended for that very reason.

If this is true I hope the administration gets it out before the Judge is granted sainthood. Right now he is being praised for his 'principles'.

31 posted on 12/22/2005 9:33:55 AM PST by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar

bttt


33 posted on 12/22/2005 10:44:17 AM PST by wouldntbprudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar
prominent liberals being prosecuted for damaging the fight against al Qaeda via leaks of classified data.

The RATS would not be prosecuted but allowed to resign. Prosecution would hurt the war effort and Bush is smart enough to know that.

34 posted on 12/22/2005 11:32:52 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson