Skip to comments.
The "Ultimate Betrayal"?
National Review Online ^
| December 21, 2005
| W. Thomas Smith, Jr.
Posted on 12/21/2005 5:52:15 AM PST by Moonraker
Why is it taking so long to design, develop, produce, and deploy in adequate numbers a troop-transporting armored vehicle that would replace the up-armored Humvee in Iraq? I've been asked that question time and again, not by soldiers and Marines who ride in Humvees daily, but by fellow journalists, many of whom have logged time in Iraq or Afghanistan.
One reporter said to me it was "criminal negligence" on the part of the White House and the Defense Department. Another referred to it as "the ultimate betrayal" of our soldiers. Despite their time in country, both reporters are wrong: Their opinions are based more on political animus than any real grasp of the facts.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; africa; armor; army; b17; combat; f22; forces; high; hmmwv; humvee; ied; iraq; marines; mines; mobility; multipurpose; raptor; special; uparmoredhumvee; vehicle; war; wheeled; wheeledarmor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
12/21/2005 5:52:17 AM PST
by
Moonraker
To: Moonraker
Yes, why can't the President design a vehicle that is light, fast, cheap, roomy, maneuverable, bullet proof, rocket propelled grenade proof, and able to withstand the combined blast of 4 115 MM artillery shells and then have thousands of these vehicles manufactured and sent over to Iraq in the next month or so?
Why does the President refuse to use his magic wand to make make this happen, just as he refused to use his magic wand to fix New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina?
2
posted on
12/21/2005 5:57:00 AM PST
by
Ninian Dryhope
("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
To: Ninian Dryhope
Well, I would want a DVD player and spinners, too.
3
posted on
12/21/2005 6:00:35 AM PST
by
neodad
(Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
To: Moonraker
... both reporters are wrong: Their opinions are based more on political animus than any real grasp of the facts.
Most obvious statement of the day!
4
posted on
12/21/2005 6:00:40 AM PST
by
Paloma_55
(Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
To: Moonraker
Lock up the so-called Reporters.
5
posted on
12/21/2005 6:00:42 AM PST
by
YOUGOTIT
To: Ninian Dryhope
"Yes, why can't the President design a vehicle that is light, fast, cheap, roomy, maneuverable, bullet proof, rocket propelled grenade proof, and able to withstand the combined blast of 4 115 MM artillery shells and then have thousands of these vehicles manufactured and sent over to Iraq in the next month or so? Why does the President refuse to use his magic wand to make make this happen, just as he refused to use his magic wand to fix New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina?
Just as I had mustered the perfect response to this P.O.S. article - I find that you have already posted it!
6
posted on
12/21/2005 6:01:08 AM PST
by
Redbob
To: Moonraker
One reporter said to me it was "criminal negligence" on the part of the White House and the Defense Department. Another referred to it as "the ultimate betrayal" of our soldiers
Shocking
7
posted on
12/21/2005 6:02:11 AM PST
by
Vision
(“We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the duty of intelligent men")
To: Ninian Dryhope
He only has Magic Wand 1.3.2 ver5......armored carriers and hurricane relief is scheduled in release 6.....
Geez, do I have to explain everything around here?
8
posted on
12/21/2005 6:02:18 AM PST
by
nevergore
(“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
To: Moonraker
What are Bush and Rummy doing all night? The lazy bums should be out in the garagedesigning and building the darn thing. Those reporters didn't get it wrong. They printed just what they intended.
To: Moonraker
Would one of these reporters be Joe Galloway? It seems he is riding his laurels for the Ia Drang Valley campaign a tad too much. He has been an unabashed critic harping his anti-Bush, anti-Rumsfeld screeds whilst hiding behind his glory moment of 40 years ago.
To: Moonraker
Why is it taking so long to design, develop, produce, and deploy in adequate numbers a troop-transporting armored vehicle that would replace the up-armored Humvee in Iraq? 1. Waste
2. Corruption
11
posted on
12/21/2005 6:04:11 AM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(Vote for gridlock)
To: gatorbait
Well, in February 1942 someone came up with the prototype for the bazooka. The first few thousand copies had been manufactured by May 1942. It was so new that troops going to invade N. Africa in November 1942 had never used it, and had to practice with it on shipboard.
In the 1970s or 1980s, it was proposed that we have a replacement for the M-113 armored personnel carrier.
It took committees SEVEN YEARS to decide on what to get--the Bradley.
That's the difference between wartime necessity and
peacetime congressional/contractor gaming.
Sorry, but while I am a dyed-in-the-wool supporter of Bush
and the war in Iraq, on this matter I'm with the critics.
To: WhiteGuy
To have this equipment now, the money needed to be budgeted and program started around 1995.
Somehow it wasn't a priority back then.
13
posted on
12/21/2005 6:07:05 AM PST
by
Wristpin
("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
To: WhiteGuy
Um, it's a JEEP. So, stop using them as APC's.
14
posted on
12/21/2005 6:07:19 AM PST
by
massgopguy
(massgopguy)
To: Moonraker
Just issue everyone a M1A2 Tank and be done with it...
15
posted on
12/21/2005 6:08:45 AM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: YOUGOTIT
Just shoot them. They do shoot reporters in Iraq don't they? I heard in the news that they do.
16
posted on
12/21/2005 6:09:15 AM PST
by
SR 50
(Larry)
To: Wristpin
To have this equipment now, the money needed to be budgeted and program started around 1995.
Somehow it wasn't a priority back then.
1.Waste
2.Corruption
17
posted on
12/21/2005 6:09:42 AM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(Vote for gridlock)
To: Moonraker
These things take time.
Which begs the question: Why didn't bubba build it?
OTOH, it's probably a good thing he didn't. If he had, he would have sold it to China.
18
posted on
12/21/2005 6:11:14 AM PST
by
elli1
To: nevergore
19
posted on
12/21/2005 6:13:10 AM PST
by
Alice au Wonderland
(I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going to blame you.)
To: WhiteGuy
You are right on your two points, but omitted the third reason: the Federal Acquisition Regulations, aka FAR, or government procurement system.
The bureaucratic jungle slows design, procurement, and delivery to a dead snails pace. The FAR, like the IRS and 60-70% of the federal government, should be trashed and started all over from new blueprints.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson