Those Jihadie SOB's try to impose anything on Miss Victoria, and her Grandpa El Gato will vote against them...from the rooftops.
Miss Victoria
(Click on image for larger version)
Posted on 12/20/2005 1:53:05 PM PST by LibWhacker
At the behest of Muslim bigots and multiculturalist fanatics the Bracks Government suspended free speech in Victoria by imposing a blasphemy law dressed up as an anti-vilification law. This has given Islamo-fascists a freehand to attack critics of Islam.
In a ruthless attempt to intimidate critics Muslim fanatics reported two pastors to Diane Sisely, the Equal Opportunity Commission boss, for criticising the Koran. This enemy of free speech and her fellow Stalinoids on the commission then launched proceedings against the pastors for exercising their fundamental and inalienable right to free speech. So far these pastors have had to pony up more than $100,000 to defend themselves against Bracks’ obscene blasphemy law and these lefty zealots.
However, circumstantial evidence suggests that members of the Equal Opportunity Commission entered into a conspiracy to prosecute these pastors in order to intimidate potential critics of Islam into remaining silent.
Diane Sisely hired May Helou, a Muslim bigot, to help her identify people criticising Islam. True to form, this Muslim Torquemada quickly swung into action. Helou incited several Muslim converts to attend a seminar on jihad that had been organised by a Melbourne Pentecostal church. As a result three Muslims attended. About 250 Christians were present.
Pastor Danny Nalliah and Pastor Daniel Scot addressed the crowd. Pastor Daniel Scot, who had been sentenced to death in Pakistan for his Christian beliefs, accurately cited passages from the Koran and the Hadith, pointing out that these had been used by fanatical clerics to justify jihad against the West, lying for Islam, murdering apostates, raping female prisoners, etc. (Tell me, little Miss Sisely, do these passages make the Koran hate speech?)
The Pastors’ response to this barbarism was that Christians should pray and that Muslims “should be loved”. (This just goes to show how viciously intolerant these Christians really are). Well, this was just too much for our freedom-loving Muslim converts. Seething with trumped-up indignation, these monuments to the unquestionable benefits of multiculturalism complained, surprise, surprise, to May Helou who immediately brought the EOC down on the heads of our oh so dangerous Pastors. As a member of the commission this Muslim bigot even got to sit in judgment on its religious victims. (Talk about acting as judge, jury and executioner).
There is no doubt in my mind that some members of the commission conspired with May Helou to engage in the religious persecution of these Christian critics of Islam. Given the nature of the evidence there should be an immediate and independent investigation of Sisely and Helou. As the EOC has been compromised by religious bigotry and its obvious contempt for Australian values, it should be abolished.
Under Bracks’ blasphemy law these victims of Muslim intolerance were ordered by the Orwellian Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to publicly apologise and humiliate themselves by spending $23,000 on ads. Furthermore, the Tribunal’s commissars ordered the pastors to submit to a form of re-education. They bravely refused to kowtow to these intellectual thugs.
The disgusting Stalinoid behaviour of Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal perfectly mirrors the behaviour of communist parties. Those who dissent from the party line are ordered to attend a meeting of party members where they are then humiliated and verbally abused. This continues until the victims submit*. Fortunately for Victorians, though they don’t know it yet, these pastors are determined to see that justice is done and the fundamental rights of Victorians are restored.
The provoked riots in Sydney are revealing what happens when Australians get sick of a minority trying to impose, with the tacit agreement of cowardly politicians and half-witted multiculturalists, its reactionary Muslim beliefs on them
How does the slimy Mr Bracks view the riots that were incited by Lebanese Muslim thuggery? “Similar violence against ethnic minorities could occur [here]” (The Age, Attacks possible here, 12 December). Now you have it, Muslim thugs provoke riots and the lying Bracks smears the locals as racists.
Although it is something of mystery why Bracks is determined to impose a blasphemy law that favours Muslim bigots, what is not a mystery is the man’s contempt for the truth. Last September this mountebank met with several bishops. He looked them in straight in the eye and promised to make his blasphemy law less onerous. The lying creep then went about subverting our liberty by further strengthening this vicious law.
As a member of the Liberal Party I am outraged that Robert Doyle has supported Bracks’ anti-free speech laws. There are those of us in the Party who are sick of his moral cowardice and his lack of principles. We are also sick of Michael Kroger’s political string-pulling. Thanks to this power mad Brahmin the Party has been lumbered with the likes of Boyle, Sheezel and Helen Kroger.
Rumour has it that Kroger’s number is up. In the meantime the Party’s real liberals, liberal in the classical sense of the word, need to take a stand. Now Brookes has never bothered with religious matters, but when a bunch of theocrats, irrespective of their religion, succeed in limiting our freedoms then it is time to act.
It genuinely grieves me to have to do this because the Muslims I have known and worked with have always been decent to me and never raised the question of religious beliefs. But Bracks’ vile laws and the totalitarian behaviour of EOC and VCAT officials have left me with no alternative. So here goes: The Koran is crap and Mohammed was a child-molestering, thieving, lying, murderous sadistic misogynist who couldn’t even spell his own name. How anyone with half a brain could be taken in by this loathsome thug beats me.
Now the law is the law, Bracks: So prosecute me. If you haven’t got the guts get the conspiring Diane Sisely and May Helou to send in their religious police. But if you think for one moment that a man like me would politely stand by and allow your two-faced commissars or some Vishinski-like judge to lecture me on tolerance and freedom, then you really are stupid.
While leftwing journalists and slimy politicians like Bracks and NSW Premier Morris Iemma smear Australians as racists, I should like to draw attention to what Professor von Mises had to say on the clash of values, which is what this is really all about:
In an Australia governed according to [classical] liberal principles, what difficulties could arise from the fact that in some parts of the continent Japanese and in other parts Englishmen were in the majority? (Liberalism: A Socio- Economic Exposition, Sheed-McMeel, 1978. Originally published as Liberalismus, Jena: G. Fischer, 1927).
But the treacherous likes of Sisely, Bracks and the bigoted Helou despise classical liberal values, preferring instead the heavy hand of the police state. These people and their admirers have clearly demonstrated their tyrannical inclinations, revealing once and for all that they are not to be trusted with any degree of political power.
*This is how the Hollywood branch of the Communist Party of the United States disciplined writers, producers and actors who challenged the party line. See Kenneth Lloyd Billingsley’s Hollywood Party, Prima Publishing, 1998. Also the God that Failed, Columbia Press 2001, reveals just how vicious this mentality is. Mao’s Red Guards took this procedure of public confession, guilt and humiliation to its logical and gruesome conclusion. Mao: The Unknown Story, Jung Chang and John Halliday, Jonathan Cape London, 2005.
Gerard Jackson is Brookes’ economics editor
I'd say it is dangerous - complacency always is, and the born-to-rule mentality... I went to one of the top schools myself and teach in one of the other now, and in a sense, these schools are the centre of the old style conservatism (even though, like most schools, a lot of leftist ideas are within them today), and frankly, a lot of us do see ourselves as some sort of aristocracy, above the common herd, divorced from day to day politics. And it's that attitude that allows people like Steve Bracks to do what they do, without much conservative interference.
I mean it comes up at Liberal party meetings - Steve Bracks went to St Patrick's in Ballarat - not one of the best schools, but still he can't be all that bad. John Brumby went to Melbourne Grammar, so he is one of us really - of course, he isn't - but that is the way so many people still seem to think in the upper echelons of the party. John Cain went to Scotch, for that matter.
It is a born to rule attitude - and even many of the Labor party leaders came from the same educational background, so those with the born to rule attitude tend to trust them in ways that they shouldn't.
Those Jihadie SOB's try to impose anything on Miss Victoria, and her Grandpa El Gato will vote against them...from the rooftops.
Miss Victoria
(Click on image for larger version)
But Peninsula Grammar is well and truly one of the establishment schools today, and (speaking as an Old Geelong Grammarian) I do think these schools are different - and they are at the core of Victorian conservatism - even though they also produce their fair share of lefties.
It's a good thing and a bad thing. It means that we do have a core of well educated conservatives constantly bubbling up from below - but it also means that conservatism in Victoria can be very cliquish and clubbish at times. I'm not sure how welcoming it is to those who come from a different background.
It can also lead to some rather... odd positions at times. Last week, the state government announced changes to the Education Act that, among 446 pages of new legislation, contains one paragraph that would take away the right of independent schools to use the cane. And quite a few Liberals of my acquaintance are seeing this as a massive deal. The fact that Labor wants to introduce a Bill of Rights next year, which would enshrine in legislation the left wing ideas of what rights people should have, pass without much comment. But threaten the right of our schools to inflict corporal punishment and this is a big deal.
Fact is, significant sections of Victorian conservatism are in my view, too complacent and exclusive. They're there - but they don't make themselves heard very often. And when they do, it can be about very minor issues.
bump
Hutton Gibson and his son should be forced to move back there.
America's not good enough for you, eh? Then go back to your down-under paradise and live under sharia law. Send us a post card.
Didn't they take all the guns away Down Under?
THE TRUTH ABOUT AUSTRALIA
If you're an American, your knowledge of Australia may be limited to kangaroos, koala bears, Crocodile Dundee and the 2000 Sydney Olympics.
But if you're an American who has seen the infamous NRA infomercial, you may think that Australia also has a surging crime rate.
In 1996, after a terrible massacre in the Australian state of Tasmania, the Australian federal and state governments agreed on new firearms laws that, in effect, banned military and repeating style rifles and shotguns. The new law also introduced a comprehensive registration system for firearms. Handgun ownership was already strictly regulated and had been for decades -- the new regulations dealt only with long guns.
About 660,000 firearms were handed in to the government in return for more than 400 million Australian dollars, financed by a one-time add-on to the income tax.
And in 1998, the rate at which firearms were used in murder, attempted murder, assault, sexual assault and armed robbery went down. In that year, the last for which statistics are available, the number of murders involving a firearm declined to its lowest point in four years.
Of course, the Australians have always had tougher gun laws than the U.S. - despite that country's own frontier history and its cultural similarities to the United States. But in 1998, 54 Australians lost their lives to gun homicides, while in the States the number exceeded 13,000. The gun homicide rate in the U.S. is about 15 times that of Australia...and this is the nation the NRA wants us to condemn!
The next time a credulous friend or acquaintance tells you that Australia actually suffered more crime when they got tougher on guns...offer him a Fosters and tell him the facts.
June 2000
http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/issues/?page=australia
Thanks for the info Fred.
But when the Aussies show up with bats and the Moslems show up with guns, there will also be less killing but a lot more surrender than over here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.