“Bush Spying Story” Is Four Years Old

Sweetness & Light ^ | December 19, 2005 | N/A

[Sam Hill]

It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror.

[Dog Gone]

No "almost" about it.

[Sam Hill]

FYI

[marblehead17]

ping

[Skooz]

They absolutely do.

They would be more than happy to watch the nation annihilated as long as it makes Bush look bad.

[SF Republican]

The story was held so they could run it the same day as the Iraq elections; we won't be allowed any good news for America while GWB is in office. These "revelation's" will occur anytime anything positive happens.

[Eva]

Visit Alamo Girl's Downside legacy to review how Clinton expanded Echelon to spy on US citizens and foreign companies and then sold the technology to the Chinese!

http://www.alamo-girl.com/0024.htm

[Mike Darancette]

It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror.

Do you think?

Too bad the RATS and their useful idiots (MSM) will require further pain to "get it" and STFU.

[aft_lizard]

nice find

[finnman69]

Bingo

The NY Slimes was trying to smother the elections.

Not onloy did it not work, the reporters are going to need to hire some very expensive lawyers while they are investigated by the AG for the classified leaks.

[gondramB]

"It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror."

Their story is clearly politically slanted. It is common "knowledge" within the IT community that calls from the U.S to overseas are monitored. Anybody acting surprised about this is either stupid or dishonest.

Now that said, we may need to change the law because it is not clear that what the President has authorized is legal.

[BigSkyFreeper]

It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror.

Almost? The same newspaper that for days published the obituaries of 3,000 Americans in 2001, finds itself in total agreement with the same bastards who killed those 3,000 Americans.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

There is a book .....

**************************************

A Must Read:

Unholy Alliance :
Radical Islam and the American Left (Hardcover)
by David Horowitz

**************************************

Vastly Illuminating, September 25, 2004

Reviewer:

Kat Bakhu (Albuquerque, NM United States) - See all my reviews

I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.

It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.

Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.

This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air.

<**************************************

[Rakkasan1]

why have FISA warrants if you're not gonna use them?
I read somewhere that 758 were applied for and the same # granted, so why not go through the warrant process?

just wondering.

[Howlin]

we won't be allowed any good news for America while GWB is in office.

This explains the "the econmy is tanking" mantra we hear from the MSM and the DNC.

[WakeUpAndVote]

When did MATA get voted on and adopted?

[anonymoussierra]

---

“Eto fore information of this should not be release. Infore it jeopardizes your nation security and other coalition’s nations.

I am astounded of this information being made public. Fore underlines your security of your nation.

I am adamant of your reporters and their life Infore your security is in danger. "Your enemy is well aware of your moves. Damage is done."”

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you all. Be strong America!!!!!

[Marine_Uncle]

One of these days I must see if I can find it in the public library system. Thanks.

[TheCrusader]

"It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror"

Yep. It shows you how much hatred can blind the senses.

On the one hand they condemn Bush for not going far enough in implementing the "9/11 Commission's" suggestions, while on the other they condemn him for taking steps like this to increase our security and help catch terrorists before they strike. They don't care one iota about terrorism, they just want to nail Pres. Bush.

Bush is too wise and too good a man to get caught in their traps, so they simply invent situations like this to turn public sentiment against him. There is nothing worse than people who will bear false witness against others to cause them harm. These people at the N.Y. Times are in the same moral category as the terrorists, that's why they are allies.

[Sam Hill]

It was passed by the House and then incorporated into the Patriot Act:

Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:H.R.2975: