Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror.
1 posted on 12/19/2005 11:34:12 AM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Sam Hill

No "almost" about it.


2 posted on 12/19/2005 11:35:34 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin; Deb; kcvl; Mo1; Enchante; nopardons; veronica; KJC1; stocksthatgoup; mewzilla; backhoe; ...

FYI


3 posted on 12/19/2005 11:35:45 AM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Darth Reagan

ping


4 posted on 12/19/2005 11:36:45 AM PST by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

They absolutely do.

They would be more than happy to watch the nation annihilated as long as it makes Bush look bad.


5 posted on 12/19/2005 11:38:03 AM PST by Skooz (Santa's laughter mocks the poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
The story was held so they could run it the same day as the Iraq elections; we won't be allowed any good news for America while GWB is in office. These "revelation's" will occur anytime anything positive happens.
6 posted on 12/19/2005 11:38:56 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

Visit Alamo Girl's Downside legacy to review how Clinton expanded Echelon to spy on US citizens and foreign companies and then sold the technology to the Chinese!

http://www.alamo-girl.com/0024.htm


7 posted on 12/19/2005 11:39:18 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror.

Do you think?

Too bad the RATS and their useful idiots (MSM) will require further pain to "get it" and STFU.

8 posted on 12/19/2005 11:42:34 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

nice find


9 posted on 12/19/2005 11:43:09 AM PST by aft_lizard (What does G-d look like then if we evolved from nothing?See Genisis Ch 1:26-27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

"It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror."

Their story is clearly politically slanted. It is common "knowledge" within the IT community that calls from the U.S to overseas are monitored. Anybody acting surprised about this is either stupid or dishonest.

Now that said, we may need to change the law because it is not clear that what the President has authorized is legal.


11 posted on 12/19/2005 11:45:16 AM PST by gondramB (Rightful liberty is unobstructed action within limits of the equal rights of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror.

Almost? The same newspaper that for days published the obituaries of 3,000 Americans in 2001, finds itself in total agreement with the same bastards who killed those 3,000 Americans.

12 posted on 12/19/2005 11:46:15 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Luke 2 : 8-14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

why have FISA warrants if you're not gonna use them?
I read somewhere that 758 were applied for and the same # granted, so why not go through the warrant process?

just wondering.


14 posted on 12/19/2005 11:50:02 AM PST by Rakkasan1 (Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill; All

When did MATA get voted on and adopted?


16 posted on 12/19/2005 11:51:06 AM PST by WakeUpAndVote (Member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1992!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
"It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror"

Yep. It shows you how much hatred can blind the senses.

On the one hand they condemn Bush for not going far enough in implementing the "9/11 Commission's" suggestions, while on the other they condemn him for taking steps like this to increase our security and help catch terrorists before they strike. They don't care one iota about terrorism, they just want to nail Pres. Bush.

Bush is too wise and too good a man to get caught in their traps, so they simply invent situations like this to turn public sentiment against him. There is nothing worse than people who will bear false witness against others to cause them harm. These people at the N.Y. Times are in the same moral category as the terrorists, that's why they are allies.

19 posted on 12/19/2005 11:59:33 AM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
With the help of Google turned up this website :

News stories about echelon
America's Global Surveillance Network

22 posted on 12/19/2005 12:06:02 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror.

It's all politics. If a Democrat were currently infesting the Oval Office and conducting the WOT in precisely the same manner that Bush currently is you can bet the farm the NYT would be on-board with every last Presidential move. So it's not that the MSM wants us to lose, just that they want us to lose as long as there's a GOP President. Partisan politics trumps national security in their feeble brains.

26 posted on 12/19/2005 12:16:06 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

NY Times and the Democratic Party are bankrupt morally, spiritually, intelectually, and politically.

They have not come up with a bright idea since FRD's New Deal.

They are sunk, and they know it, thus they must continue to pull out of their butts four-year-old "issues" to try to denigrate our President and his policies.

As Newt said, they would rather see an entire US city nuked than let the FBI do what they've been doing from time immemorial, i.e., wiretap the bad guys.

The president's approval ratings are on the rise again, and this is giving the Dems nightmares.


30 posted on 12/19/2005 12:22:10 PM PST by Palladin (Merry Christmas! God bless us, every one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill


Read more at FReeper Fedora's post:
Traitors of Record: The Record of the New York Times

38 posted on 12/19/2005 12:46:51 PM PST by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill

This is making me want to puke. I have come to a conclusion that a disgusting bunch of people work for the NY Times.


41 posted on 12/19/2005 12:49:26 PM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
ECHELON Research Resources

The U.S. House of Representatives Web Sites
Search Result: 262 documents match your search ECHELON
55 posted on 12/19/2005 1:24:28 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sam Hill
It's almost as if the NY Times wants us to lose the War On Terror.

The real fear that the NYTimes has about the WOT?
That The LATimes will beat them to the punch in causing the US
to lose this war.

I just about spit bullets when the LA Times was publishing the
description, location and types of vehicles being driven by
US operatives in Afghanistan just before we started dropping bombs.
What a bunch of perfidious weasels most of the journalists truly are.
61 posted on 12/19/2005 1:44:55 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson