Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX Breaking News- Bush to Hold Press Conference at 10:30 a.m. EST This Morning
FOX NEWS ^ | 12/19/05 | BREAKING NEWS - FOX NEWS

Posted on 12/19/2005 5:36:07 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper

Bush to Hold Press Conference at 10:30 a.m. EST This Morning

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; homelandsecurity; neoconsdiesoonplease; nsa; patriotleak; pressconference; spying; traitorleak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,661-1,6801,681-1,7001,701-1,720 ... 2,021-2,033 next last
To: Lizarde

BTW, you'd think they would be more afraid of Cheney than Bush, right?

Or are they going to impeach him, too?


1,681 posted on 12/19/2005 11:29:59 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1678 | View Replies]

Comment #1,682 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin
That's what they think...however, as of lately nothing is coming their way. They just can't get over the impeachment of the 'toon.

If they think for one minute they can impeach W...they are just showing again how stupid they continue to be.
----------------

TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 36 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1802

1802. Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal; duties and compensation of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of court Release date: 2005-03-17

(a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—

(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at— (i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801 (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or (ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801 (a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; [e.g., defined as terrorists /angkor]

(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person [e.g. citizen or perm. resident /angkor] is a party; and

(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801 (h) of this title; and if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.

1,683 posted on 12/19/2005 11:30:31 AM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1649 | View Replies]

Comment #1,684 Removed by Moderator

To: shield
The liberals think protecting the United States from attack is an impeachable offense. Seriously.. no, I mean I am being serious here.They really think they have Bush right where they want him.
1,685 posted on 12/19/2005 11:30:38 AM PST by Diva Betsy Ross (Thank you troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1654 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression
I think that step by step process began when Gore went into seclusion. ;)

Yeah, and Howard Dean is the crazy uncle in the attic.

1,686 posted on 12/19/2005 11:30:42 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Luke 2 : 8-14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1675 | View Replies]

To: newconhere

The only way they could do this is to get the House back; that's not going to happen.


1,687 posted on 12/19/2005 11:30:54 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1679 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Or are they going to impeach him, too?

They are going after ALL top leader

Bush .. Cheney .. Delay .. and Frist

1,688 posted on 12/19/2005 11:31:18 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1681 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Don't Feingold and Boxer understand how stupid they sound when they say why does the president need the patriot act if he thinks he can do whatever he wants anyway (ie so-called domestic spying)? The fact the president wants the patriot act proves he does want to do this within the law!

Sheesh, they are idiots.

1,689 posted on 12/19/2005 11:31:22 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1660 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

He has absolutely NO PROOF Of that.

I think I read it had been used 12 to 18 times.


1,690 posted on 12/19/2005 11:31:41 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1650 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny
Don't Feingold and Boxer understand how stupid they sound when they say why does the president need the patriot act if he thinks he can do whatever he wants anyway (ie so-called domestic spying)? The fact the president wants the patriot act proves he does want to do this within the law!

They don't care

This is all about the 2006 elections

1,691 posted on 12/19/2005 11:32:36 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1689 | View Replies]

Comment #1,692 Removed by Moderator

To: Lizarde

This is making me grumpy and I'm losing my good feeling from the press conference.

I may have to go beat a dog. :-)


1,693 posted on 12/19/2005 11:33:35 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1692 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde
this cowardly behavior of helping the terrorists didn't work for Kerry and it's not going to work now

No it won't .. but they are listening to their base .. not the moderate dems ... or the rest of the country

Dang .. I'm really late .. and need to head out

1,694 posted on 12/19/2005 11:33:58 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1682 | View Replies]

To: Diva Betsy Ross

It appears so.


1,695 posted on 12/19/2005 11:34:07 AM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1685 | View Replies]

Comment #1,696 Removed by Moderator

To: BigSkyFreeper

Dean is nuts and I have noticed that he has been awfully quiet since his 'we cannot win' comments.


1,697 posted on 12/19/2005 11:34:09 AM PST by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1686 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde
this cowardly behavior of helping the terrorists didn't work for Kerry and it's not going to work now

I would say it's more like reprehensible behavior. The Democrats had many opportunities to denounce this left-winged kookery, but they chose not to, and are reaping the "rewards", and this is all that they have no. They are a party surviving on left-winged conspiracy theories and other various assorted kookiness.

1,698 posted on 12/19/2005 11:34:59 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Luke 2 : 8-14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1682 | View Replies]

To: shield
) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person [e.g. citizen or perm. resident /angkor] is a party;

What about this part of the code. How does this impact on the presidents authority do do as he is doing?

1,699 posted on 12/19/2005 11:35:16 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1683 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde

I am partisan, but I cannot imagine the everyday "moderate" person not getting behind the president with these actions. If he wasnt doing these things I would be furious if something was to happen. Im so confused by these people.


1,700 posted on 12/19/2005 11:35:40 AM PST by newconhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1692 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,661-1,6801,681-1,7001,701-1,720 ... 2,021-2,033 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson