Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spy Vs. Spy: The Morality of "Munich"
rogerebert.com ^ | December 14, 2005 | Jim Emerson

Posted on 12/16/2005 11:02:47 AM PST by pcottraux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: ClearCase_guy
maintain that the Nazis are demonized for several reasons: They attacked Stalin and threatened the existence of Marxism They were Socialists (National Socialists) but they lost. No one likes a loser.

Bingo! When demmonizing mass-murdering Stalinist international socialists becomes as popular as demonizing mass-murdering Hitlerite national socialists, we'll know that our culture has finally taken a turn toward toward intellectual honesty.

One of the biggest lies in popular culture is the idea that National Socialism is a "right-wing" phenomenon.

21 posted on 12/16/2005 11:49:18 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
"...Nobody ever seems to object to demonizing the Nazis. Yet when other groups express their desire to complete their work, we're not supposed to demonize them..."

6 million dead.

The other groups will be demonized only when they exterminate the rest of the JEWS...

Than Hollywood can make pro-Israeli movies for another 50 years...

Who`ll be first in line to make those movies?...Hollywood stinks of drugs, divorce and STDs.
22 posted on 12/16/2005 11:51:35 AM PST by forYourChildrenVote4Bush (Democrats need to shower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: forYourChildrenVote4Bush
6 million dead.

Correction: 6 million Jews dead ... the National Socialists killed 11-12 million total people in Hitler's death camps.

When I was in highschool, this was common knowledge ... somehow, in the last decade or so, half of Hitler's death camp victims got dropped down the memory hole. The result is a half-truth; worse than an outright lie.

In the name of all that's holy (or at least in the name of intellectual honesty and historical accuracy) let's not participate in the dishonesty of half-truths ... Just say "no" to holocaust-denial.

23 posted on 12/16/2005 12:15:29 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Arafat authorized the creation of the Black September terrorist organization and was essentially its secret chief executive officer. But he had it set up in a way that he could claim plausible deniability for its actions even though he had to personally approve all of its major operations. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I even think that he made the statement at some point that Black September WAS the PLO/Fatah.


24 posted on 12/16/2005 12:17:39 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

"Spielberg's track record is the best in Hollywood."

Yep. An amazing talent for reaching massive audiences with brilliant cinematic storytelling technique. Lots of people in Hollywood claim to know what "works." But Spielberg is the only one to have proven it so consistently over time.


25 posted on 12/16/2005 12:40:10 PM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER; Grampa Dave; devolve; potlatch; ntnychik; dennisw; SJackson; nuconvert; F14 Pilot; ...

Jerusalem (CNS) – Yasser Arafat's PLO was directly responsible for the assault on Israel's athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics, one of the men who oversaw the attack has confirmed 27 years later.


26 posted on 12/16/2005 12:47:11 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux; F15Eagle
I'm wondering where this guy is getting off at, and I'm thinkin' that its just about time to yank the cord; this guy clearly missed his stop (and frankly I want him off of my bus). I heard it said that liberals aren't stupid; its not that they don't know anything, its just that everything that they know is wrong.

Steven Spielberg hired Tony Kushner last year to rewrite the script of a movie about Israel’s clandestine - and lethal - response to the massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics. Kushner has been quoted in an interview with the Times of London, where he declared:

I deplore the brutal and illegal tactics of the Israeli Defense Forces in the occupied territories. I deplore the occupation, the forced evacuations, the settlements, the refugee camps, the whole shameful history of the dreadful suffering of the Palestinian people; Jews, of all people, with our history of suffering, should refuse to treat our fellow human beings like that...I think the founding of the State of Israel was for the Jewish people a historical, moral, political calamity.... I wish modern Israel hadn’t been born.
Spielberg says this in an interview with Time’s Richard Schickel, on the non-judgmental tone of his new movie:

I think the thing I’m very proud of is that [screenwriter] Tony Kushner and I and the actors did not demonize anyone in the film. We don’t demonize our targets. They’re individuals. They have families. Although what happened in Munich I condemn.
That's liberal psychobabel at its gaudiest, and could be as equally non-judgemental of monsters such as Hitler, Stalin, or Pol-Pot. The film’s intended message can be gleaned from this little gem from Time’s cover story:
There is an entirely fictional scene in the movie in which [the leader of the Israeli hit squad] and his Palestinian opposite number meet and talk calmly, with the latter getting a chance to make his case for the creation of a homeland for his people. That scene means everything to Kushner and Spielberg..... Without that exchange, 'I would [said Spielberg] have been making a Charles Bronson movie - good guys vs. bad guys and Jews killing Arabs without any context. And I was never going to make that picture.'
For all pragmatic purposes, Spielberg's intent is to portray Palestinian terrorists as calm, reasonable human beings, and muddying any possible distinctions between the good guys and bad guys. That he and Kushner flat out have to depend on an entirely fabricated scene to do just that, well, at least with E.T. and Jurassic Park viewers knew they were getting fiction. This is not so emminently true with Hollywood productions like The Manchurian Candidate remake, or network televisions The Commander in Chief. You can argue until the cows come home with some people about Farenheit 911, but it won't make a lick of a difference. "Did you see it? No? Well, then you don't know what you're talking about." To them, Roger Moore's vomitus is akin to Holy Writ.

Not much of anything is said concerning the guilt of the Israeli athletes in Munich. What did they do to deserve being murdered, and in Germany (of all places), less than thirty years after the Holocaust? That's black sarcasm at its best, and irony at its most horrific. Of course Israel's response to that was guided by a Zionism then at its height rather than the self-loathing and abasement that exists among the Israeli elite today.

Interestingly enough though, the guy makes no reference to the chief financier of The Munich Massacre, Abu Mazen, who just so happens to be the present leader of the Palestinian Authority. Keep in mind also, our own elected leaders not merely engage with this old terrorist, they've outright rolled out the red carpet before him to our White House and our Capitol.

27 posted on 12/16/2005 1:09:19 PM PST by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux
I've no plans to see "Munich" (saw the events unfold on TV and I really don't want to try & "understand" the aftermath). I've never seen "Schindler's List" (saw the raw footage taken in the 1940's). General premise on both by Speilberg seems to be the same...a combination of viewpoints (Schindler was essentially a "Nazis" with a conscience).

Those currently in power in Hollywood want a world in which there are no absolutes of morality. A world of gray...so that the Self-Centered-Desire-Of-The-Moment can be fulfilled without interference of conscience... They will side with "Bad" Guy in "Black" because darkness covers the real ugliness of the events... Think about some of the tabloids' reports of late night clubs and how totally ridiculous & perhaps even disgusting to themselves the celebrity patrons would look if the floodlights suddenly came on & the music stopped.

The difference between the violence done by Islamic Terrorists and violence done by the Israelis... Well, Israelis do not strap bombs onto mentally disabled children. Or for that matter pay parents to have a child become a suicide bomber. Terrorists do not need to be understood, they need to truly meet the One God...

28 posted on 12/16/2005 1:23:41 PM PST by SergeantsLady (I support my soldier by supporting the mission he believes in...Iraqi Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Sorry, Roger? I meant Michael Moore. Dude, that was bad (quietly, slinking away...and then slinks back with an after thought...)

You know, though, I'd probably go see a Jame's Bond 9/11 movie, but only if Gene Simmons was cast as James Bond (now runs away in all haste and fear of life before things are hurled!). But then it wouldn't be a Roger Moore James Bond movie would it? O.k., nothing to see here, just move along...

29 posted on 12/16/2005 2:41:23 PM PST by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard; ClearCase_guy

Well said.

Have either of you noticed that in a terrible way, Nazis used to be the most useful villains in movies, but they have been replaced by...CORPORATIONS!!!


30 posted on 12/16/2005 2:56:17 PM PST by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SergeantsLady

Good analysis. A good retort to EMerson's intellectual-ness, which I'd like to see more of.


31 posted on 12/16/2005 2:59:23 PM PST by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: carton253

Oh, wait, how could I not ping YOU to this one?


32 posted on 12/16/2005 3:08:26 PM PST by pcottraux (It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo



     GOOD   GRIEF!     


33 posted on 12/16/2005 3:17:00 PM PST by devolve (<-- (--in a manner reminiscent of Senator Ghengis Kohn--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: karnage
I think Spielberg's genius is that he can reach the mass audience as no one before him has. I think his talent can best be described as being wide but shallow. His imagery is easily graspable but never eloquent, and his characters are types. Without John Williams's music hyping the emotions, his movies would be seen as the empty toy boxes they are.

I am not a big fan of his, though I've enjoyed several of his movies. But pretending he is anything but the biggest boy on the block in Hollywood career-success-wise is just silly.

34 posted on 12/16/2005 3:49:07 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (An agnostic who never, ever says "Happy Holidays")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
Not at all.

Mel Gibson has directed two big hits and one minor one. Many directors can say the same.

Jackson has directed a trilogy that's been beloved for decades and has a huge fan base. Don't get me wrong, I loved the LOTR movies and never read the books, so I'm not slagging the guy. But there are enormous flaws in the trilogy, which is probably my favorite fantasy movie (I count it as one, as does Jackson).

Potential major competition? Sure. But come back in 30 years and we'll see. Spielberg's been directing huge hits since the mid-seventies, and Jackson and Gibson probably won't even live long enough to topple his record.

On a personal preference, I prefer those two to Spielberg, but they're not even in his league.

35 posted on 12/16/2005 3:52:08 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (An agnostic who never, ever says "Happy Holidays")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux

By the way, I read your vanity... and I agree with what you wrote. Now, let me read this article.


36 posted on 12/16/2005 6:23:55 PM PST by carton253 (Al-Qa'eda are not the Viet Cong. If you exit, they'll follow. And Americans will die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Durban was the UN Conference that declared the Zionism was racism and Israel a racist state.


37 posted on 12/16/2005 6:29:00 PM PST by carton253 (Al-Qa'eda are not the Viet Cong. If you exit, they'll follow. And Americans will die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pcottraux
Again...my problem with Munich is that Spielberg equates the response to terrorism more loathsome than the original terrorist act.

This movie has less to do with Munich and more to do with our response to 9/11. How he portrays the Israeli response is how he sees our response.

To me, you can't equate the two. What Black September did was loathsome. They had death coming especially since the West did not care to exercise justice. The Germans let them the surviving terrorists go. Just let them go, even though there was a "hijacking" to cover up the fact.

No one defends Israel... and when she defends herself, she is hammered as being immoral or worse more repugnant than the terrorists, who broke into an Olympic village and murdered 12 athletes. The guilty are the Palestinians... and any attempt to portray it any other way is wrong. To me... it's that simple.

38 posted on 12/16/2005 6:37:53 PM PST by carton253 (Al-Qa'eda are not the Viet Cong. If you exit, they'll follow. And Americans will die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

ROTFLOL! I love the jar-o'-fat!


39 posted on 12/16/2005 6:52:14 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dervish; Sabramerican
One of the Israelis in "Munich" says, almost under his breath as I recall: "How do you think we got the land in the first place? It wasn't by being nice." For perspective here, it helps to remember -- for just one example -- that the militant Zionist organization Irgun (listed by the British as a terrorist organization, and headed by future Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin) blew up the King David Hotel in 1946, killing 91. Terrorism -- or, if you prefer, the killing of civilians whether as intended targets or acceptable "collateral damage" -- has been used by extreme factions on all sides over the years.

I just love this...

First of all, Israel got the land by international decree...It's called the Mandate...Which was changed without due process three times.

Second of all, say what you want about the Irgun, (whether they were or were not a terrorist organization is a matter for history.) For the record...even though out last postings ended up in insults... I do not believe that the Irgun were terrorists. They are not equated with Hamas or any of the other terrorist groups that attack Israelis on a daily basis. The Irgun attacked government and military for one reason... the British were denying the Holocaust survivors access to the land because the British had decided to back the Arabs in the dispute over the land. In fact, (and I know that you are well aware of this) the British answer to the Holocaust was for the Jews to go back and rebuild Germany.

As for the King David Hotel... there is much confusion about what happened. The Irgun has always stated that they made phone calls announcing the bomb and giving the British plenty of time to evacuate. But, for the Irgun, the very survival of Jews were at stake. After 6,000,000 dead, the Irgun had every reason to have that concern.

The Palestinians don't have the same concern. If they would sit down and negotiate and give up their passion for the entire land, they would have their state. But, they don't.

Not the same...And to put the Irgun and Black September in the same moral equivelent category is plain wrong...

40 posted on 12/16/2005 6:53:28 PM PST by carton253 (Al-Qa'eda are not the Viet Cong. If you exit, they'll follow. And Americans will die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson