Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RetiredArmy
"Tell us first Jim!!!!"

Actually, someone else already did. See last night's thread and my post #70. That's all I know other than the actual IP addresses (which don't tell us anything without an enforceable subpoena to the ISPs).

16 posted on 12/15/2005 1:56:43 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

We know the truth Jim. You are just holding out to play yourself in the made for TV movie! Holding out for book rights, that up front $$$$. :)


19 posted on 12/15/2005 1:58:27 PM PST by RetiredArmy (I have no faith in any politician or political party any more. They all lie for their agendas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I sent your post #70 to WBAL anyway. Your layout of the timeline and possible criminal plan with the WP is excellent!


25 posted on 12/15/2005 2:00:54 PM PST by Woodstock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
See last night's thread and my post #70.

Thanks for that reference, Jim. I hadn't been too sure what this is about, and that post made it clear.

30 posted on 12/15/2005 2:04:16 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Anyone have a link to last nights thread?


34 posted on 12/15/2005 2:07:42 PM PST by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
When I first read that you were going to release the account information I was worried about precedent, but after reading what you said in the previous thread (#70) I'm fully behind you. And you're right, this should be page one news.
53 posted on 12/15/2005 2:20:01 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

What has legal counsel told you about this setting undesirable precedent for releasing member information without a subpoena in the future?


60 posted on 12/15/2005 2:35:56 PM PST by SolidSupplySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
See last night's thread and my post #70.
From I-Team Uncovers MD4Bush E-Mail Addresses:
To: cgk

I gave some info to a trusted professional (who wishes to remain anonymous for the time being) who is helping us get to the bottom of this matter. When asked if I was worried that it might go public some day, I said, no, it's bound to get out sooner or later anyway.

I feel that a (possibly criminal) political dirty trick has been committed against Governor Ehrlich and Joe Steffen and the evidence would lead any rational thinking person to believe that it was perpetrated by officials of mddems.org, perhaps working in concert with a reporter from the Washington Post.

After this story first broke, I was startled to discover an email address from mddems.org associated with the MD4Bush account and then even more startled when I discovered logins to that account from the Washington Post's server. I posted my suspicions early on and almost welcomed a subpoena from any investigative committee that might be interested. Not surprisingly, the Democrat controlled committees were not interested in following leads on Democrat corruption.

The reporter on the original story lied. He originally claimed that he did not know the identity of MD4Bush. He also did not disclose that he had secretly logged into the MD4Bush account after mysteriously receiving the password from an unknown source, nor did he disclose the nefarious motivations of his sources. Later (probably because he knew we had the evidence against him in our logs) he attempted to cover his lies and now claims he received the password for MD4Bush from an unnamed intermediary. This too appears to be a lie and all of his actions in regards to this matter appear to be breaches of journalistic ethics and standards (as if there were such things in the MSM).

I believe that if an official of mddems.org (ie, the official Maryland Democrat Party) is working in collusion with The Washington Post in an attempt to bring down a sitting Republican governor, then this would be a much more serious crime than anything Joe Steffen may have posted on an open public forum, and it should be exposed. Hell, it should be breaking news.

So, why am I not concerned that the reporters finally got the email address info? Well, first of all, MD4Bush breached any agreement he may have had with Free Republic.

Number one, the very first post he made after registering was to NCPAC, so it's obvious he had intent and a targeted individual in mind from the very start. It's also now just as obvious that he had nefarious purposes in mind when he registered to FR posing as a conservative when he was actually an official Democrat mole. This is called playing games with his FR account which is against our rules.

Number two, he used FR to purposely plant false rumors.

Number three, he shared his password with one or more third parties.

Number four, he passed on the real life identity of one of our members along with his private mail communications to a third party (a Washington Post reporter) with the intent said reporter would publish said private material.

Number five, he then posted the same private mail messages to the open forum.

Number six, all of this appears to be a conspiracy with malicious intent to defame, libel, slander and defraud Steffen and Ehrlich. Using FR for criminal purposes is against our rules.

And so, no I'm not concerned that it's going public. As I said above, the fact that The Washington Post is working in concert with the Democrat Party in an attempt to bring down a sitting Republican Governor should be breaking news. And if the Democrat controlled committee is not interested and the MSM is not interested, then the story might as well break right here on Free Republic where MD4Bush and the Washington Post perpetrated the crime. The truth shall set you free.


70 posted on 12/14/2005 10:02:59 PM PST by Jim Robinson
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

65 posted on 12/15/2005 2:47:42 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I want to tell you thanks for all your sacrifice in providing Free Republic for us. I met you at the march for freedom in D.C.


100 posted on 12/15/2005 5:12:17 PM PST by Galveston Grl (Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
In that post (number 70) you keep going on about the press being in cahoots with the dem party in trying to bring down a sitting republican... What's the big deal? After all, if CBS and the Kerry campaign can do it, why can't the Washington Post and the MD dem party?

What's the big deal?

Other than possibly exempting both from their "press" exemptions to the McCain Feingold CFR laws. Say, has anyone thought about going to the courts to declare both CBS news and the Washington Post as agents of the democratic party in order to shut them down during the election cycles? That would be a hoot, wouldn't it?

Mark

124 posted on 12/15/2005 6:26:19 PM PST by MarkL (I swear by my pretty floral bonnet that I will end you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

So what are the IP addresses?


140 posted on 12/15/2005 8:43:16 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
"And if the Democrat controlled committee is not interested and the MSM is not interested, then the story might as well break right here on Free Republic where MD4Bush and the Washington Post perpetrated the crime."

It wouldn't be the first time now would it.

L

154 posted on 12/15/2005 10:11:46 PM PST by Lurker ("Son, there's only two things you need in this world; love and a .45.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson