Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Accepts McCain's Ban on Torture
Associated Press ^ | 12/15/05 | jamese777

Posted on 12/15/2005 10:05:55 AM PST by jamese777

White House Agrees to McCain Torture Ban Move Comes After House and Senate Back Language By LIZ SIDOTI, AP

WASHINGTON (Dec. 15) - After months of resistance, the White House has agreed to accept Sen. John McCain's call for a law specifically banning cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of foreign suspects in the war on terror, several congressional officials said Thursday.

The congressional officials spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they did not want to pre-empt an expected announcement later in the day at the White House, possibly by President Bush and McCain.

These officials also cautioned the agreement was encountering opposition in the House from Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee.

Wednesday, in a symbolic move, the House endorsed the Senate-passed ban. Approved 308-122, the procedural vote in the House puts political pressure on negotiators - but does not require them - to include the ban and another provision standardizing interrogation techniques used by U.S. troops in a final wartime military spending bill.

(Excerpt) Read more at articles.news.aol.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; americaloses; mccain; torturebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141 next last
To: samadams2000
Better watch where you say that. You'll be accused of being a DU troll.

Although, I'm starting to agree.
101 posted on 12/15/2005 1:07:34 PM PST by birbear (Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheForceOfOne

bttt!


102 posted on 12/15/2005 1:08:08 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

>>>He chose to let others go before him.

A STAGED few! For show. Most if not all of the rest are now dead.


103 posted on 12/15/2005 1:09:16 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: TChris
It doesn't matter. Most, but not all people will give the President a pass on this when in fact he could veto it. Just like CFR.

There's a lot of McCain complaining on this forum, but I really believe that the WH simply uses him as a conduit for things they really believe in but want to be perceived as being backed into a corner in having to do.

Why else would the President be so cozy with the Senator? Let McCain do the dirty work and take the heat.

104 posted on 12/15/2005 1:32:14 PM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

If McCain is soooooo against torture, why is his ugly mug on television all the time??

McCain should be illegal.


105 posted on 12/15/2005 1:36:31 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Ah - weighing in without even a working knowledge of the fundamentals?

This is where I get that working knowledge. I was 13 in 1984, we weren't at war and our greatest adversary had a standing army and adhered to the Geneva Conventions… so this particular convention slipped below my radar. But, now that I've read it, it's good to know that John McCain took this thing pretty much verbatim and slapped his name on it. He's quite the visionary. Now wonder the media worships him.

My first question is, if these restrictions were already in place, what purpose does this amendment serve?

My second question is, do you honestly believe the wording of this twenty-one year old convention is appropriate for this war, against this enemy? And do you believe that the restrictions against "degrading treatment" will not be exploited by lawyers for the jihadists? I mean, couldn't confinement in a structure with no windows facing Mecca (for example) be considered "degrading treatment" of a devout Muslim jihadist?

106 posted on 12/15/2005 2:03:05 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: samantha

It's nice to hear someone who has done their homework...John boy is not all he is cooked up to be......


107 posted on 12/15/2005 2:39:42 PM PST by RVN Airplane Driver (Most Americans are so spoiled with freedom they have no idea what it takes to earn and keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: TheForceOfOne
Now we need to see what the agreement contains and who in congress supported it.

IMHO, there was no agreement.
The "deal" was that McCain was holding all the cards in this instance, considering the the congressional votes regarding this issue.

We have a serious problem in Congress, we have way to many Republicans allowing the Democrats to call the shots.

There is no way the President can credibly threaten to veto any bill now, let alone the bill to which this amendment was attached, considering the congressional votes held on this issue to date.
The veto power can only be a credible threat if exercised previously when such a threat had a chance of succeeding and for whatever reason McCain and the RINO contingent appears to have allowed the President to at least save face here by putting forth the illusion that some sort of "deal" has been reached.

108 posted on 12/15/2005 4:07:18 PM PST by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: RedRightReturn
I his own book he relayed the fact that he folded just from the THEART of medical treatment being withheld.. said he saw a gay which had ejected, injured his leg and subsequently died...
He accepted treatment from a Russian doctor flown in specifically to treat him, treatment that was not given to other prisioners, a clear violation of the UCMJ.
He also signed confessions stipulating that he bombed hospitals and intentionally targeted civilians. He participated in propaganda recordings played to other POW's
109 posted on 12/15/2005 4:39:18 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RedRightReturn
I his own book he relayed the fact that he folded just from the THEART of medical treatment being withheld.. said he saw a gay which had ejected, injured his leg and subsequently died...
He accepted treatment from a Russian doctor flown in specifically to treat him, treatment that was not given to other prisioners, a clear violation of the UCMJ.
He also signed confessions stipulating that he bombed hospitals and intentionally targeted civilians. He participated in propaganda recordings played to other POW's
110 posted on 12/15/2005 4:40:07 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Benedict Arnold (January 14, 1741 — June 14, 1801) was a general in the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War, who conspired with the British side to surrender the fort at West Point, New York. He switched allegiances after he had become disaffected due to perceived grievances he had suffered at the hands of the Continental Congress and the military. Corruption charges filed against him by Pennsylvania civil authorities and his mounting debts also contributed to his decision to switch sides. He strongly opposed and was very indignant at the decision by the Continental Congress to form an alliance with France, having experienced a bitter defeat at the hands of the French and their Indian allies during the French and Indian War (1754–1763).

In 1780 he formed a plot to take control of the fort at West Point, New York and hand it over to the British. This would have given the Tory forces control of the Hudson River valley and split the colonies in half. The plot was thwarted, but Arnold successfully evaded capture by Continental forces. As a reward he was given a commission as Brigadier General in the British Army, along with a reduced award of £6000 sterling.

The name Benedict Arnold has become an eponym for "traitor" in the United States.

So you see, even heroes can become traitors.

111 posted on 12/15/2005 4:49:19 PM PST by xrp (Conservative votes are to Republicans what 90% of black votes are to Democrats (taken for granted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington

2008 is going to shatter the Republican Party.


112 posted on 12/15/2005 4:53:18 PM PST by xrp (Conservative votes are to Republicans what 90% of black votes are to Democrats (taken for granted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: xrp
2008 is going to shatter the Republican Party.

But the best thing we got going for us is the Democrat Party and their day-by-day meltdown. Just as the Federalist Party died a deserved death due to a dearth of patriotism, so go the 'Rats.

113 posted on 12/15/2005 4:58:38 PM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (How long do we have to pretend that the vast majority of Democrats are patriots?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Sorry, but I can't support Republicans anymore.

Control of the House for 11 years, the Senate for the same amount of time except for Jim Jeffords' defection and the Presidency for 5 years now.

Government is bigger than ever. It's grown MORE under Bushie than Slick Willie.

114 posted on 12/15/2005 5:04:01 PM PST by xrp (Conservative votes are to Republicans what 90% of black votes are to Democrats (taken for granted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Madeleine Ward

Bush is as weak as his father, both wobblies.


115 posted on 12/15/2005 5:13:22 PM PST by jeremiah (People wake up, the water is getting hot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xrp

I'm not sure you can say the growth has been greater. If so, only because The 'Toon cut defense by far too much, and Bush has had to build it back up. Do you really think 'Rat control of government would shrink spending?


116 posted on 12/15/2005 5:18:12 PM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (How long do we have to pretend that the vast majority of Democrats are patriots?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
If so, only because The 'Toon cut defense by far too much, and Bush has had to build it back up.

That's a common and convienent excuse by Republibots/Bushbots.

http://www.sentryoveramerica.com/issue24_Surge_of_Socialism.htm

117 posted on 12/15/2005 5:24:23 PM PST by xrp (Conservative votes are to Republicans what 90% of black votes are to Democrats (taken for granted))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

I'd like to be considered 'nothing' as well. Who are we to criticize inane legislation, because the writers served in Nam and therefore they are NOT to be questioned....


118 posted on 12/15/2005 6:02:07 PM PST by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

If he does beat Hillary, he will do it without my vote.


119 posted on 12/15/2005 6:17:59 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

"Ah - weighing in without even a working knowledge of the fundamentals?"

When citing this treaty, the left always omits exemptions regarding stateless fighters

http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu2/6/cat/treaties/convention-reserv.htm


120 posted on 12/15/2005 6:26:17 PM PST by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson