Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oxford loses 800-year right to choose undergrads
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051215/lf_afp/britaineducation_051215052425&printer=1;_ylt=AtkkG9rKhF5g_ds0Xi5t0mz2_sEF;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE- ^

Posted on 12/15/2005 9:46:09 AM PST by SmoothTalker

The colleges of Britain's prestigious Oxford University will lose their 800-year-old right to choose their undergraduates amid government pressure to admit more students from state schools and lower social classes.

Instead, admissions will be centralized to encourage applications from pupils from broad-based secondary schools who find current arrangements "confusing and opaque", the university said, according to The Daily Telegraph.

Pupils will apply to the university, not a specific college, and will be interviewed and selected by the appropriate department, not by their potential tutors, the university said.

The university admitted that as a result, colleges will lose autonomy and individuality, according to the newspaper.

Candidates will be able to state a college preference once they have been offered a place but in principle all successful applicants will be centrally ranked on the basis of their performance, then distributed randomly, it added.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: admissions; diversity; highereducation; oxford; oxfordu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
PC liberalistm weakens another great institution.
1 posted on 12/15/2005 9:46:12 AM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
" . . . admissions will be centralized to encourage applications from pupils from broad-based secondary schools who find current arrangements "confusing and opaque" . . ."

If the prospective students are befuddled by the admissions process, what does that say about their chances for academic success?
2 posted on 12/15/2005 9:48:54 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
Wow. If this reform is applied assiduously, Oxford is over.
3 posted on 12/15/2005 9:50:52 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
I'd say they jettisoned their standards when they admitted Sh#%head Clinton, and then subsequently let his ugly spawn on campus.

Losers.

4 posted on 12/15/2005 9:51:41 AM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

Yeah, but not end of the world.

IF (and only if - I don't know what is going on there) truly, the poor people are denied, give them some chance to get in.

If tutors are the only one picking, then one nerdy tight-ass would pick another nerdy tight-ass.


5 posted on 12/15/2005 9:52:08 AM PST by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

According to what I've read, they receive funding from the government, which opens them up to PC scrutiny. If they were totally private, then I'd say they have a case.


6 posted on 12/15/2005 9:53:37 AM PST by opticks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
People from from state schools and lower social classes. as they delightfully put it have been gaining admittance to, and graduationg from, Oxford for decades. This is just BS cover for forcing a lowering of standards.
The dumbing down continues.
7 posted on 12/15/2005 9:53:59 AM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

I don't understand why they can't leave something good alone. If the government thinks they need more students from "lower social classes" (code words for "minorities"?) then why doesn't the government build "Oxford II" and admit who they like? What about the deserving students that they displace? Does anyone worry about the unfairness to them when their admissions spots are taken by someone with lower grades and test scores? Could it be because it's easier to drag down something good to a lower level than to build something positive yourself? Hmmm, sort of like the terrorists.


8 posted on 12/15/2005 9:57:36 AM PST by generally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Oxford is over. Beyond Oxford, the Rennaisance is over. The second darkness looms.


9 posted on 12/15/2005 9:59:17 AM PST by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
The basic "value" of a degree from Oxford just took a nosedive.Cambridge,no doubt,is soon to follow.
10 posted on 12/15/2005 10:00:10 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
I could never understand the bit about "colleges" as being part of Oxford, as in, T.E. Lawrence attended "Jesus College" at Oxford.

To me, a college is a college. Is this like a county within a state?

11 posted on 12/15/2005 10:01:09 AM PST by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD

LOL at anyone thinking Oxford is any different from any other private university in the US. I would estimate 40 percent of the students got in through legacy, connections and not by virtue of their academic talent. Nothing wrong IMO with telling the schools that since you're receiving millions of pounds of tax dollars, contributed by ALL members of society, your admissions policy should reflect the fact that everyone at least has a chance to attend.

Most of the "dumbing down" happens when the schools let in Johnny just because daddy graduated 30 yrs ago.


12 posted on 12/15/2005 10:01:11 AM PST by buckeye2159
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
If tutors are the only one picking, then one nerdy tight-ass would pick another nerdy tight-ass.

So what? People have a right to pick anybody they want.

13 posted on 12/15/2005 10:01:15 AM PST by CAWats (And I will make no distinction between the terrorists and the democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CAWats

Everyone has a right to a degree from Oxford.
Just let the government put them in the mail and send them out; it will save everyone a lot of time and work. . .


14 posted on 12/15/2005 10:05:09 AM PST by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: generally

There's no logical reason why they couldn't have a couple of different avenues of admission - one through the traditional tutors and individual colleges another through the university directed and administered by the department faculties. There's no reason the tutors themselves should be prevented from picking students. Nothing wrong per se with a general admission to the university. But if they think this will eliminate bias or unfair discrimination, they're wrong. It will just replace it with another kind of bias and discrimination.


15 posted on 12/15/2005 10:07:47 AM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
Oxford may not be unique, but its arrangement is highly unusual ... the numerous Colleges which, together, make up "Oxford University" are (or were) virtually independant. One applies to a particular college in Oxford, based on one's interests, and is accepted or not by that college as the student of a particular professor. It's very different from American colleges and universities.

I believe that Magdalen College (in New Hampshire, USA) is organized similarly ... except that there's only one college.

16 posted on 12/15/2005 10:07:58 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

Amen. Whatever Oxford's problems (and several posters have noted some) the government picking its students is only going to make them worse.


17 posted on 12/15/2005 10:07:59 AM PST by Steelerfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

20 quid or whatever the heck those silly brits use for currency ... says, Oxford is bending to pressure to admit "poor muslims".

I'l gar-un-dam-t-yah that's the back story.


18 posted on 12/15/2005 10:10:09 AM PST by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

To apply for study with a particular professor, a student would have to know their life goals. Seems a tall order for eighteen year olds.


19 posted on 12/15/2005 10:16:05 AM PST by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

"..amid government pressure to admit more students from state schools and lower social classes."

Interestingly, they don't specifically cite race as a criteria for entry.

In some ways, we here in the US are actually more PC than our european bretheren.


20 posted on 12/15/2005 10:17:22 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson