Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/15/2005 8:43:23 AM PST by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: areafiftyone
I won't print the first words that came to mind.

We need a third party.

2 posted on 12/15/2005 8:44:18 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Oh cripes.


3 posted on 12/15/2005 8:44:59 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I'll wait for the whole story.


4 posted on 12/15/2005 8:45:30 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

"You are either with us, or against us...but we'll compromise if you're undecided."


7 posted on 12/15/2005 8:46:08 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (None genuine without my signature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

#*!&@#*$&@&#!!!!!!

I just pray that the House grows a pair and keeps this crap out of any conference report.


9 posted on 12/15/2005 8:46:59 AM PST by Tree of Liberty (requiescat in pace, President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
Check this link.
10 posted on 12/15/2005 8:47:08 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
FROM REUTERS

White House near deal on anti-torture measure

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Under bipartisan pressure to put into law a ban on the torture of detainees, the White House appeared on the verge of a deal on Thursday with Sen. John McCain on a measure requiring the humane treatment of prisoners in U.S. custody, administration officials said.

"We're about there," said an administration official familiar with the negotiations. "They're close but I can't say it's done," said another official.

In a final push for a deal, the chairmen of two Senate and House of Representatives committees were set to meet to work out final details of the legislation, a Senate aide said.

12 posted on 12/15/2005 8:47:40 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

bttt


13 posted on 12/15/2005 8:47:45 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
"The White House has agreed to accept Sen. John McCain's proposal...."

W's aversion to the veto sometimes reminds me of Maclain Stevenson on the old Mash series:
"What am I signing Radar"? - "Don't worry sir, just sign your name here..."

("What's this "campaign finance bill about radar?" - "Don't worry Sir, the Supremes will just toss it out anyway, just sign it....")

18 posted on 12/15/2005 8:50:17 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

No more torture? - Does this mean we will never hear or see McCain again? Then I may be for it.


19 posted on 12/15/2005 8:50:56 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

There is a cancer on the Republican party and its name is John McCain.


21 posted on 12/15/2005 8:51:03 AM PST by conservative barking moonbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

Why did the WH do this?

The legal term of torture means to cause bodily organ failure and is already illegal. As well, I've never seen ANYTHING to suggest we engage in that type of torture.

The "new" definitions seem to include things like humiliation and uncomfortable positions like standing for a long time.

I'm stunned.


23 posted on 12/15/2005 8:51:41 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

This doesn't have to be a bad thing. As much as we'd like to see these beasts tortured thoroughly, I think it's worthwhile to show the world that the US still expects its soldiers to maintain their humanity.
It also says that we believe our way is the best way, and we don't have to stoop to ugly methods to maintain our freedoms.
Finally, for the serious people working for us in the field, these new standards won't prevent them from doing their jobs. Those guys usually don't work with an audience, anyway. It's really not a bad thing that the US goes on record saying that we don't accept torture as a policy.


29 posted on 12/15/2005 8:54:48 AM PST by RightbrainBrother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

He's still doing the 'stupid-pills'...


31 posted on 12/15/2005 8:55:34 AM PST by johnny7 (“Check out the big brain on Brett!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

AAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHhhhhhh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !


34 posted on 12/15/2005 8:57:55 AM PST by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I think that the operative phrase here is "in US custody". This does not preclude the "rendition" procedure of sending them to their "home" country, or other "interested" countries for a "high pressure interview". The terrorists would be accorded Gitmo style treatment, until they are turned over to their fellow countrymen. That may be the backdoor "deal" with McCain: he and his ilk lay off the Congressional "investigations", in exchange for a deal that effectively gets US personnel completely out of the "torture" loop.


43 posted on 12/15/2005 9:01:36 AM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

FoxNews radio reporting that White House is saying No Deal has been reached on this Bill.


44 posted on 12/15/2005 9:01:38 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone

I'll believe it when I read the exact thing the White House agreed to. Until then it's just MSM spin.


46 posted on 12/15/2005 9:01:46 AM PST by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: areafiftyone
I don't think this is a big deal. Condi has already said that no U.S. personnel may use cruel or degrading practices at home or abroad (the inclusion of the word "may" is not superfluous), and, when asked if Condi's statement amounted to a new policy, the White House said that "It's existing policy."
48 posted on 12/15/2005 9:02:26 AM PST by BikerNYC (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

McCain's Torture and Interrogation Amendments

Action under S.1042
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006.

S.AMND.1556 relates to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment of persons under the custody or control of the United States Government.
S.AMND.1557 relates to uniform standards for the interrogation of persons under the detention of the Department of Defense.
S.AMND.2425 relates to both, "cruel treatment" and "uniform standards for interrogation."

S.AMND.1556 Proposed 07/25, Considered 07/26, Withdrawn 11/04
S.AMND.1557 Proposed 07/25, Considered 07/26, Withdrawn 11/04
S.AMND.2425 Proposed 11/04, Considered 11/04, Passed 11/04 on a voice vote.


Action under H.R.2863
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006.

S.AMND.1977 relates to both, "cruel treatment" and "uniform standards for interrogation."

S.AMND.1977 Proposed 10/05, considered 10/05, Passed 10/05 : 90-9 / Roll Call Vote No. 249

     SEC. 1073. UNIFORM STANDARDS FOR THE INTERROGATION OF PERSONS
                UNDER THE DETENTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
                DEFENSE.
     
       (a) In General.--No person in the custody or under the
     effective control of the Department of Defense or under
     detention in a Department of Defense facility shall be
     subject to any treatment or technique of interrogation not
     authorized by and listed in the United States Army Field
     Manual on Intelligence Interrogation.
   
       (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to with
     respect to any person in the custody or under the effective
     control of the Department of Defense pursuant to a criminal
     law or immigration law of the United States.
     
       (c) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
     construed to affect the rights under the United States
     Constitution of any person in the custody or under the
     physical jurisdiction of the United States.
     
     SEC. 1074. PROHIBITION ON CRUEL, INHUMAN, OR DEGRADING
                TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT OF PERSONS UNDER
                CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES
                GOVERNMENT.

       (a) In General.--No individual in the custody or under the
     physical control of the United States Government, regardless
     of nationality or physical location, shall be subject to
     cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.

       (b) Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
     construed to impose any geographical limitation on the
     applicability of the prohibition against cruel, inhuman, or
     degrading treatment or punishment under this section.

       (c) Limitation on Supersedure.--The provisions of this
     section shall not be superseded, except by a provision of law
     enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act which
     specifically repeals, modifies, or supersedes the provisions
     of this section.

       (d) Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
     Defined.--In this section, the term ``cruel, inhuman, or
     degrading treatment or punishment'' means the cruel, unusual,
     and inhumane treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth,
     Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the
     United States, as defined in the United States Reservations,
     Declarations and Understandings to the United Nations
     Convention Against Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman
     or Degrading Treatment or Punishment done at New York,
     December 10, 1984.

54 posted on 12/15/2005 9:08:15 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson