Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's WMD Moved to Syria, An Israeli Says
http://www.nysun.com/article/24480 ^ | IRA STOLL

Posted on 12/15/2005 5:14:36 AM PST by mal

Saddam Hussein moved his chemical weapons to Syria six weeks before the war started, Israel's top general during Operation Iraqi Freedom says.

The assertion comes as President Bush said yesterday that much of the intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction was incorrect.

The Israeli officer, Lieutenant General Moshe Yaalon, asserted that Saddam spirited his chemical weapons out of the country on the eve of the war. "He transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria," General Yaalon told The New York Sun over dinner in New York on Tuesday night. "No one went to Syria to find it."

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 200303; 20030317; aldhouri; assad; bekkavalley; convoys; duelfer; hideandseek; iraq; iraqiwmds; isis; izzatibrahim; izzatibrahimaldhouri; mosheyaalon; prequel; russia; russians; syria; wmd; zarqawi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2005 5:14:37 AM PST by mal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mal

Why has the administration refused to make this case?


2 posted on 12/15/2005 5:17:36 AM PST by Perdogg ("Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mal
This tale may or may not be true, but I still think the President spoke too soon in assuming personal responsibility.

Some day, the world and Paul Harvey may have "the rest of the story".

Leni

3 posted on 12/15/2005 5:18:17 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mal

The ones that Saddam didn't sell to terrorists.


4 posted on 12/15/2005 5:20:11 AM PST by saveliberty (Stop the McCainity. Vote Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Because we would have to go to the places in Siria where they buried the WMD, and we want to finish Iraq first. As long as the WMD are buried, they aren't going to hurt anyone.


5 posted on 12/15/2005 5:21:02 AM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Why has the administration refused to make this case?

Because it then would be compelled to go into Syria and get them....... This is bad?

Mike

6 posted on 12/15/2005 5:21:14 AM PST by MichaelP ("Opportunities multiply as they are seized." Sun Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mal
He's not the only one making that claim:

It’s really too bad about Duelfer’s work being “cut short” because of Zarqawi. The trail of WMD isn’t cold. It leads to Syria and the Bekka Valley of formerly Syrian-occupied Lebanon, according to a Syrian defector to US intelligence. Gen. Tommy Franks himself leans this way, telling the media that "Two days before the war, on March 17 [2003], we saw through multiple intelligence channels - both human intelligence and technical intelligence, large caravans of people and things, including some of the top 55 [most wanted] Iraqis, going to Syria." What was so important to move to Syria immediately before the War with the top regime officials? Duelfer’s next stop should have been Damascus. With Syrian President Bashar Assad now admitting that he has stockpiles of WMD, perhaps it should be ours.

Source.

7 posted on 12/15/2005 5:22:02 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mal
If we had any real investigative reporters left in this country, or if Clinton were Pres, this would be their #1 story.

Unfortunately, America is not their priority, their "investigations" extend only to emails about a hurricane, and a so-called leak that damaged no one, while ignoring leaks that damage a war effort.
8 posted on 12/15/2005 5:25:18 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

"Why has the administration refused to make this case?"


My guess is that 'somebody' helped move them and outing the WHO would open another can of worms, and our liberals would demand a public display of "INTEL". Could well be that making the case would endanger real "covert" entities.


9 posted on 12/15/2005 5:25:22 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Why has the administration refused to make this case?

Head up: Every time I ask that question, a segment of people come along to tell me how wrong I am to even ask. It's considered "negative" to even ask this simple question.

For the lurkers, some other WMD information to digest:

Charles Duelfer said he can't rule out the possibility that Iraq's WMD were secretly shipped to Syria before 3/03 citing sufficient credible evidence that the WMD were moved.

Duelfer made the findings in an addendum to his final report last year.

It was well known that Syria was a major conduit for obtaining UN-banned materials for Iraq. Several senior US officials have seen intelligence which shows it is likely that Iraq's WMD went to Syria.

Retired Marine Lt. Gen. Michael DeLong, the dputy commander of CentCom, wrote in his book "Inside CentCom" that intelligence reports pointed to WMD movement into Syria.

John Shaw, then the deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, told The Times in October 2004 that Russian special forces and intelligence troops worked with Saddam's intel services to move WMD to Syria.

Before changing his mind again (ala John Kerry), David Kay, the UN weapons inspector, told Tom Brokaw in July 2003 that based on millions of pages of internal Iraqi government documents recovered from Saddam's regime, he was convinced that Iraq had WMD which were taken out of the country before the war. Among the documents which have been translated:

- corresponsence between various Iraqi organizations giving instructions on how to hide WMD;

- chemical agent purchase orders dated 12/01;

- WMD protection suits and instructions on how to hide chemicals;

- ricin research; and

- a memo from the Iraqi Intelligence Service on how to hid information from a UN inspection team.

Bill Clinton, perhaps remembering his own rhetoric about the danger that Iraq's WMD program posed to not just the region but the United States, said in a July 2003 interview on Larry Kind that "it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for" in Iraq.

In June 2004, UNMOVIC's executive Chairman, Demetrius Perricos, detailed the exprt of thousands of tons of missile components, nuclear reactor vessels and formentors for WMD warheads and the discovery of some of these items, with UN inspection tags still on them, as far away as Turkey, Holland and Jordan.

"According to a July 10, 2004, Washington Post article on the Senate Intelligence Committee findings about Wilson's investigatory trip to Niger, Africa, unanimously agreed by all committee senators, including Democrats, “The panel found that Wilson’s report, rather than debunking intelligence about purported uranium sales to Iraq, as he has said, bolstered the case for most intelligence analysts.

And contrary to Wilson’s assertions and even the government’s previous statements, the CIA did not tell the White House it had qualms about the reliability of the Africa intelligence that made its way into 16 fateful words in President Bush’s January 2003 State of the Union address.

”In March, 2003, when U.S. tanks rolled into Iraq, 500 tons of yellow cake uranium was found at the Iraqi nuclear research center of al-Tuwaitha. This included 1.8 tons of partly enriched uranium. On June 23, 2004, the U.S. military, working with the U.S. Department of Energy removed this material to the US where is held at an unnamed Department of Energy facility."

10 posted on 12/15/2005 5:25:56 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I agree. Remember before the 1st Gulf War, Saddam sent 25 F14 jets to Iran for safekeeping. Iran, with whom he'd been warring for years... a sworn enemy.

Best I can figure is they're not ready to march against Syria yet. Maybe they're flipping a coin between Syria and Iran.

11 posted on 12/15/2005 5:26:40 AM PST by theDentist (Typo ergo qwerty : I type, therefore I misspell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

I believe it was the best thing he could have done, the weapons will be found, and when they are, he will be the only one entitled to any credit. Nobel peace price? probably not, but history will treat him well.


12 posted on 12/15/2005 5:26:44 AM PST by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Because the Dems can make it look bad on the President.

They could say we allowed WMD's to cross from Iraq to Syria and we did nothing to stop them. They could say the President didn't show enough strength to stop the flow of WMD's. Remember the convoys going to Syria?


13 posted on 12/15/2005 5:27:20 AM PST by Liberfighter (A half truth is a whole lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mal

Why don't the Democrat leftist lunatic traitors call on their friend the UN to investigate by sending an inspection team to Syria?


14 posted on 12/15/2005 5:28:53 AM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Maybe I'm naiive or underinformed, but I haven't heard anyone ask where the physical eveidence of the destruction of the WMDs is. The UN certified that he had large stockpiles during the Clinton administration; if they were destroyed, where were they destroyed? Shouldn't there be some physical evidence of same? Where's the broken gun?


15 posted on 12/15/2005 5:30:07 AM PST by Humble Servant (Keep it simple - do what's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I suspect that the Administration cannot get into a spitting contest with the CIA operatives that seek their destruction.

For to do that would require classified info to be released by the Admin, which would be illegal and harmful to the nation's intell.

And their CIA enemies would not be held to the same standard.

It is an impossible situation when the US media works for the enemy of this nation.
16 posted on 12/15/2005 5:32:01 AM PST by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Humble Servant
The administration stated lack of evidence of weapon destruction as reason. There should have been records of their destruction or evidence of such action. Iraq provided neither.
17 posted on 12/15/2005 5:35:33 AM PST by satchmodog9 ( Seventy million spent on the lefts Christmas present and all they got was a Scooter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Saddam's WMD Moved to Syria, An Israeli Says, Quilla wrote:
He's not the only one making that claim:
It’s really too bad about Duelfer’s work being “cut short” because of Zarqawi. The trail of WMD isn’t cold. It leads to Syria and the Bekka Valley of formerly Syrian-occupied Lebanon, according to a Syrian defector to US intelligence. Gen. Tommy Franks himself leans this way, telling the media that "Two days before the war, on March 17 [2003], we saw through multiple intelligence channels - both human intelligence and technical intelligence, large caravans of people and things, including some of the top 55 [most wanted] Iraqis, going to Syria." What was so important to move to Syria immediately before the War with the top regime officials? Duelfer’s next stop should have been Damascus. With Syrian President Bashar Assad now admitting that he has stockpiles of WMD, perhaps it should be ours.

Source.
Thanks a million for the link. Great article for lunchtime reading!


18 posted on 12/15/2005 5:35:49 AM PST by Humble Servant (Keep it simple - do what's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mal
Democrats and other anti-Americans have clung to the fact that no WMD were found in Iraq as the reason for their return to power.

Sorry. It won't wash. There was plenty of time for Saddam to move the WMD out of the country and there was plenty of evidence that he did just that.

Democrats ignore the use of WMD by Saddam against the Kurds. Of course, in order to use WMD against the Kurds, or anyone else, it would have been necessary for Saddam to have WMD. That obvious fact is apparently too complicated for some to grasp.
19 posted on 12/15/2005 5:36:28 AM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

"Why has the administration refused to make this case?"

I suspect Syria has been penciled into the Middle East re-arrangment schedule for sometime after the 2006 US elections.


20 posted on 12/15/2005 5:39:29 AM PST by Rebelbase (Green bean casserole is a culinary curse upon mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson