Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House endorses ban on cruel interrogation techniques
The Mercury News ^ | Dec. 14, 2005 | WILLIAM DOUGLAS AND JAMES KUHNHENN

Posted on 12/15/2005 1:14:03 AM PST by FairOpinion

The House of Representatives on Wednesday threw its weight behind a Senate-approved ban on the use of cruel, inhuman and degrading interrogation techniques - a major defeat for President Bush that raises pressure on the White House to reach a compromise on the measure. Democrats were joined by 107 Republicans in the 308-122 vote, which instructed House members to adopt the Senate ban during conference committee negotiations over a Defense Department spending bill. Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., who has recently clashed with the White House over Iraq policy, proposed the instruction. Only one Democrat, Jim Marshall of Georgia, voted against it. "We cannot torture and still retain the moral high ground. Torture brings discredit upon the United States," said Murtha, the only House member who spoke before the vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; comfychair; fl; gwot; harris; interrogation; mccain; murtha; pantyheadgear; tancredo; terrorism; terrorists; torture; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: FairOpinion
I do agree. The administration left a vacuum, and the Dems and other idiots, like McCain filled it.

Maybe the Bush administration naively believed that people like mccain would actually put the defense of the US before their own cynical political ambitions.

41 posted on 12/15/2005 3:19:55 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
Not sure what that has to do with my argument that the administration dropped the ball.

They didn't drop the ball. I blame a liberal press that thinks the US military is more evil than al-queda and portray such 24/7, and those Congreesmen who suck up to that press.

42 posted on 12/15/2005 3:22:10 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

This needs to be the first veto from Pres. Bush. It's for our children.


43 posted on 12/15/2005 3:23:58 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Something like Charles Krauthammer suggested earlier this week would be a worthwhile counter-plan. Ban torture by military personell but leave the possibility open for high-value terrorists or in a "ticking time bomb" situation. The only caveat that I would add to that plan is that in the event that the detainee is an American citizen the president must issue an executive order before they can be tortured.

It's an extra hurdle in a time crunch, but a worthwhile protection.

44 posted on 12/15/2005 3:24:19 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Guys, it this bill passes into law, let's get this law declared unconstitutionally on the grounds it favors terrorists and gives more rights to terrorists in that bill does not protect U.S. citizens from such interrogation 'techniques'.
45 posted on 12/15/2005 3:25:01 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber; Dane

"Amazing your disconnect of a press that is out to defeat the US and the WOT.

Not sure what that has to do with my argument that the administration dropped the ball."


====

If we didn't have such a terrorist loving, anti-Bush, anti-American media, the consequence of the Bush administration not coming out strongly explaining the situation wouldn't have had such disastrous effects. If the media had done a fair reporting, it would have been obvious to the American people. President Bush counted on the people to figure things out for themselves, but with the MSM lying, distorting the news, not reporting good news, editorializing the news, they were able to shape people's opinion.


46 posted on 12/15/2005 3:25:11 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

If the terrorists will agree not to use cruel killing techniques, then this would be Queen's rules war.

Jerks.


47 posted on 12/15/2005 3:25:45 AM PST by Glenn (What I've dared, I've willed; and what I've willed, I'll do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
One of the reasons that I'm a Bush supporter is his straightforward manner.

​We are now one of the largest Spanish-speaking nations in the world. We're a major source of Latin music, journalism and culture.

Just go to Miami, or San Antonio, Los Angeles, Chicago or West New York, New Jersey ... and close your eyes and listen. You could just as easily be in Santo Domingo or Santiago, or San Miguel de Allende.

For years our nation has debated this change -- some have praised it and others have resented it. By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the new America.

George Bush from a campaign speech in Miami, August 2000.

Straightforward to a "new America".

48 posted on 12/15/2005 3:26:27 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dane
They didn't drop the ball.

I think that you're looking at it too simplistically. McCain might be looking for acclaim from the press, but nothing that the press did explains why there was such a leadership vacuum from the administration on this matter.

49 posted on 12/15/2005 3:27:31 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"I can just see after an attack, they will form a commission to find out about "the intelligence failure"'

Well, as long as the commission contains that prissy little girl Richard Ben-vineste and Jamie GORElick we'll be o.k.

50 posted on 12/15/2005 3:27:42 AM PST by RushLake (Baghdad minus saddam hussein = Detroit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber

Bush tried to get the CIA exempted, but McCain wouldn't go for it, and it seems he speaks for the entire Congress, they seem to be following him like sheep.


51 posted on 12/15/2005 3:28:20 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Straightforward to a "new America"

Yep where your hero tancredo, voted with the democrats, to aid and comfort the terrorists who wish to kill you and me.

52 posted on 12/15/2005 3:29:24 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
If we didn't have such a terrorist loving, anti-Bush, anti-American media, the consequence of the Bush administration not coming out strongly explaining the situation wouldn't have had such disastrous effects. If the media had done a fair reporting, it would have been obvious to the American people. President Bush counted on the people to figure things out for themselves, but with the MSM lying, distorting the news, not reporting good news, editorializing the news, they were able to shape people's opinion.

There are pundits on our side on FOX, as well as on the internet, and in the papers, and on talk radio. The administration has favorite reporters and they know how to get their message out in the media. If they had wanted to do so, they could have. I'm not going to give them a pass on sloppy work just because the MSM is generally hostile.

53 posted on 12/15/2005 3:31:19 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Yep where your hero tancredo, voted with the democrats, to aid and comfort the terrorists who wish to kill you and me.

He's not my hero but he's a heck of a lot better than Bush when it comes to the border.

54 posted on 12/15/2005 3:31:59 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
I think that you're looking at it too simplistically. McCain might be looking for acclaim from the press, but nothing that the press did explains why there was such a leadership vacuum from the administration on this matter

What leadership vaccum. The administartion is trying to go after the terrorists and the liberal press is trying to stop that goal anyway they can.

It really is that simple.

55 posted on 12/15/2005 3:32:02 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
I'm not going to give them a pass on sloppy work just because the MSM is generally hostile.

Whatever as you fight a war where every t is crossed and every i is dotted.

People who fight wars the way you do, lose, and the terrorists also know this.

56 posted on 12/15/2005 3:34:21 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Bush tried to get the CIA exempted, but McCain wouldn't go for it, and it seems he speaks for the entire Congress, they seem to be following him like sheep.

Yeah, I know. The problem is that they didn't make their case soon enough and the president didn't make it himself. He sent VP Cheney to deal with the Senate when it was already way too late. He should have made his case to the people more than two years ago. Instead he let it sit, and in the fullness of time it has come back to bite us in the butt.

57 posted on 12/15/2005 3:34:39 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Guess re-elections are coming up and they believe that if they don't vote this way it will hurt their chances. Has absolutely nothing to do with what is good for this country and its citizens.
58 posted on 12/15/2005 3:37:27 AM PST by Dustbunny (Main Stream Media -- Making 'Max Headroom' a reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Did they outlaw the bacon grease enema?
59 posted on 12/15/2005 3:38:51 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
What leadership vaccum?

By failing to make the case for using torture and by not clearly defining where and when it would be used, the administration sacrificed the initiative to John McCain. Now we're going to be stuck with a wrong-headed law that may tie our hands at a critical moment. This could have been avoided, but the president and his team didn't head it off when they should have. Now it's too late.

60 posted on 12/15/2005 3:39:36 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson