Posted on 12/14/2005 6:17:14 PM PST by DBeers
|
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
Isn't this Canada's role?
It's the details that get you.
Obviously, one hopes he isn't attacked or murdered. But giving him or others like him political asylum on this basis isn't a good idea. Let Canada have him.
awwwwww I don't think this federal judge will be getting a ACLU christmas card this year :-)
Granting asylum to illegal immigrants must be done for only a very few, valid reasons. The court was right in denying this person asylum. If they want in, go through the proper and legal visa and immigrant procedures.
They should have added that choosing to engage in disordered and unhealthy activities, e.g. homosexual activities, is objectively endangering ones health and risking ones life --The dangers inherent to disordered activities one chooses to pursue can only be avoided by avoiding the disordered activities themselves NOT by doing them somewhere else...
Hey, I'm gay so I should have the right to migrate to America?
Sounds like democrat logic to me.
He should have filed suit in San Francisco. The 9th Circus just loves cases like this.
If you want on/off the ping list let me and little jeremiah know.
I'm utterly amazed. There's something that Mugabe and I agree on!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.