Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Passengers tackle man charging cockpit on Honolulu flight
http://khon.com/khon/displayStory.cfm?storyID=9606 ^ | December 9, 2005 10:00 PM | Gina Mangieri

Posted on 12/10/2005 5:03:13 PM PST by WatchingInAmazement

A suspect is in federal custody after passengers say he threatened an infant and tried to charge the cockpit of an airplane en route to Honolulu. No air marshal was aboard, but seven passengers tackled and subdued him.

Passengers say the man's strange behavior started just a couple hours after Northwest Flight 91 took off from Los Angeles.

"He came up to first class several times, and at one point he really startled me... He came up to my left shoulder, and he got right in my face and he said something in Spanish -- he said something about medicine, like 'I need medicine,'" said passenger Linda Deckard from California.

She says the man even gestured threats toward a baby with a cell phone cord, and couldn't sit still. But thanks to one father's planning, a group of passengers are heroes to nearly 200 people on the flight.

"We got the word around first class that if he makes a move for the cockpit door, he's going down," said passenger Mike Deckard. "And that's just what happened. He made a move for the cockpit door and we were on top of him."

He and six others bound the suspect's hands and feet with a belt and cords from an on-board restraint pack.

"I think he's a hero," says Michael Deckard, age 13, about his dad. "I think he did a good job. Obviously he's watching a little bit of football with that tackle. Go dad!"

"If anybody's wants to try something, remember - there are 200 other people on the aircraft who are gonna stop you," Mike Deckard said.

The suspect is a 37-year-old Mexican national. He bit one man who helped tackle him -- a Honolulu Marathon runner who had to get a tetanus shot when they landed.

Passengers were questioned for a couple of hours after landing. The suspect is being held at the federal detention center.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Hawaii; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; alien; aliens; borders; closethebordernow; flight91; fryhisbutt; hnl; illegalaliens; immigration; lax; mexicannational; nationalsecurity; nwa; realid; testing123; tsa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 next last
To: NonValueAdded

"Damn straight and those heroes set the example. To propose "honoring" them with a red crescent pointed at Mecca is obscene."

I agree. This one is slipping under the radar.


161 posted on 12/11/2005 10:10:07 AM PST by strategofr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

I think they are heros. We all must be vigilant


162 posted on 12/11/2005 10:31:55 AM PST by valleyman (Support the Minutemen Support our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

Me and Bro are famous!


163 posted on 12/11/2005 10:32:00 AM PST by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - I will never take Dix or El Roy off of my ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: indcons; All

Here's another story. Just one of the many in every community in this country every day.

http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/051211/trial.shtml

Trial set for illegal immigrant linked to death of 8-year-old


By Sheryl Marsh
DAILY Staff Writer
smarsh@decaturdaily.com · 340-2437

The murder trial of an illegal immigrant, who authorities allege caused a child's death in a traffic accident a year ago, is set for Monday in Morgan County Circuit Court.

The district attorney's office plans to try Arturo Lupian for the May 2, 2004, death of Amber Merkl, 8.

Authorities allege that Lupian's vehicle struck the rear of a sport utility vehicle in which Amber was a passenger.

At the time, police said Lupian, 21, had a blood-alcohol level of .11, three points higher than the state's legal limit.

Circuit Judge Glenn Thompson denied Lupian's petitions for a bond. Lupian's attorney argued that he was entitled to a bond because the state did not charge him with capital murder.

Usually defendants facing felony murder charges may be eligible for a bond; however, at the time, Thompson said a judge may not allow a bond if the defendant is a danger to the public or a flight risk.

Lupian moved here from South Dakota and had a Tennessee driver license. Authorities determined that he is in this country illegally. Prior to the fatal accident Lupian was a construction worker.

Lawyers will select a jury Monday.


164 posted on 12/11/2005 10:37:51 AM PST by WatchingInAmazement ("Nothing is more expensive than cheap labor," prof. Vernon Briggs, labor economist Cornell Un.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

I remember in the months following 9/11, I was flying United from Chicago to Washington D.C.'s Reagan National. There were (and are) special security measures for all inbound commercial flights to Reagan. 30 min before landing ALL passengers are required to be seated and buckled in their seats, no exceptions (if you absolutely needed to take a leak you would have to do that in your seat). The Captain made that announcement (not the urinating bit) and then added.."if any part of your body enters the cockpit, that part will be mine!"


165 posted on 12/11/2005 10:43:52 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

> Are the passengers' determination enough ?

I wouldn't like to see it put to the test.

Speaking personally, I'd prefer to die fighting. But in Truth, on the day, against determined Bad Heads armed with edged weapons? It would take a brave man under the best of circumstances to take on that scenario.

Which says all the more about the bravery of the passengers of Flight 93.


166 posted on 12/11/2005 1:19:20 PM PST by DieHard the Hunter (I am the Chieftain of my Clan. I bow to nobody. Get out of my way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: IonInsights
Yes I recognize all that. It was just a joke. Maybe an off-color one. Maybe a sick one. But I stand behind it nontheless.

My kind of guy! "Did I gross you out? Good! Because that's what I meant to do! Mission successful."

Heh heh.

- another Ion kind of guy

167 posted on 12/11/2005 2:38:25 PM PST by IonImplantGuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Battle Hymn of the Republic

Gee whiz, are we going to have to start having people take mental exams before boarding flights? Or maybe they can have first class, second class and crazy class sections??
Weird.
susie


168 posted on 12/11/2005 6:54:20 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Would they call him a Mexican national if he were an American citizen? I'm asking because the terminology is starting to make my head spin.
susie


169 posted on 12/11/2005 6:57:59 PM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

THe Deckerd family were first class passengers in more ways than one. Way to go!!


170 posted on 12/11/2005 7:10:00 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
With the attitude and level of (in)tolerance we have toward potential trouble makers on board flights, I am wondering WHAT IF a Sep 11 like attempt were to take place today. Lets say the same gang of 19 ( Atta et-al, Marwan Al-Shahhi et al, etc) armed with the same box cutters and the same level of physical skill were to attempt something similar, would the passengers be able to take them on and overpower them? I know they nearly did on United 93 but there was one fewer hijacker. This is assuming there are no armed air marshals on board. Are the passengers' determination enough ?

Even if they manage to take over the cabin, they won't get into the cockpit - the doors are reinforced now.

171 posted on 12/11/2005 8:17:14 PM PST by xjcsa (The Kyoto Protocol is about as futile as sending seven maids with seven mops to rid a beach of sand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Plus they reacted *after* the perps had control of the plane. That wouldn't happen now.


172 posted on 12/11/2005 8:18:07 PM PST by xjcsa (The Kyoto Protocol is about as futile as sending seven maids with seven mops to rid a beach of sand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: WatchingInAmazement

We could let every passenger on board with bazookas right now. There is no way in hell the other passengers will let them use one. People are ready to protect themselves. This, not any government effort, is why there will never be another 9/11, and why TSA expenditures are 100% grade-A worthless P.R., and a waste of taxpayer money.


173 posted on 12/11/2005 8:47:52 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Cowards cut and run. Marines never do. Murtha can ESAD, that cowardly, no-longer-a-Marine, traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket

It's the P.C. way of saying "NOT an American citizen, not in America legally". "Illegal alien" has such a nasty ring to it, don't you think, and "National" has such a dignified sound it makes a good euphemism.....ha ha.


174 posted on 12/11/2005 10:31:39 PM PST by baa39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

The shoot down is the ultimate solution but we need to give the passengers as much chance as possible before that particular trigger needs to be pulled.

I want to see a federal requirement for police truncheons to be installed in holsters at every passenger seat on every commercial airliner. Furthermore, there need to be caches of reserve truncheons installed in the overhead storage compartments of all commercial airliners.

We already know that on 11 September, United Airlines flight 93 failed in its terrorist mission due to the courageous actions of a few passengers. Not too long after 9/11, there was an episode during which a deranged man was subdued by a pilot AND his fellow passengers after he invaded the cockpit. This article shows the same pattern, the passengers are the critical security element. Our citizens will not allow themselves to become passive participants in a terrorist attack.

We already trust our citizens to bear arms in defense of our nation. What fools must we be if we cannot trust them to defend their own lives aboard airliners threatened by terrorists!

Clubs are natural weapons that require virtually no training to use. The flight safety card simply needs to note where the truncheons are, what their purpose is, the ways of employing them (swung, thrust or thrown) and suggested tactics to use in subduing any terrorists. Five terrorists armed with truncheons (or truncheons AND boxcutters) will not be able to withstand the attack of fifty frightened and determined passengers armed with 100 or more truncheons. I know that if I'm a passenger on a hijacked plane, I'll take those odds any day rather than allow some SOB to make my bones part of a hole in a building or a field!

This also relieves us of the ridiculous need to forbid the carrying of pocket knives, box cutters, nail clippers, razors, bookmarks, etcetera by passengers. Fifty passengers wielding two-foot long truncheons are more than a match for any terrorist foolish enough to use pocket knives or bookmarks to try and take over an airliner. As a corollary, airport security can concentrate its efforts on what really counts (guns, explosives, aerosol cans, combat knives, tasers, laser blinding devices, etc.).

The handwriting is on the wall, when the bleep is the TSA going to get smart and read it! This article just underlines what should have been obvious almost from day one to anybody but a TSA bureaucrat. Make the passengers part of the solution and quit treating them as part of the problem!


175 posted on 12/11/2005 10:44:14 PM PST by lechtellhavel ("Life consists not in holding good cards but in playing those you hold well."--Josh Billings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: lechtellhavel
From early on in this mess, I have advocated offering training to those concealed carry permit holders who desire it, and the issuance of suitable ammunition for practice and use, if necessary.

Concealed carry permit holders have already passed background checks, proven themselves capable of using proper situational restraint, and in most cases, of being accurate with the firearm of choice.

Those who passed would carry their personal weapon on board, get to skip the usual nonsense, and be permitted at the federal level to carry in the jurisdiction they were flying to, regardless of local or state laws. Incentive enough to sign up, for most, as if being able to 'do' something about the safety of their fellow passengers and self were not enough.

Of course, this will happen when PETA is walking around, en masse, in lizard fur coats.

My next suggestion was for the issuance of a sheath knife to each passenger, for the same reason as you would issue truncheons.

After reflection, I like your idea, too, but instead of a full length police truncheon, how about one, say, at a foot to 18 inches. I have been in enough fights on school busses back when to know anything much longer will be difficult to wield with maximum efficiency, especially in a crowded environment packed with seats and passengers.

Those who, for whatever reason 'lose it' as seems to be increasingly common need not (necessarily) be killed, merely subdued. The option to finish the job, in the case of hardcore terrorists exists, but if the passengers can subdue, search, and secure them, they may have intelligence value if properly interrogated.

176 posted on 12/12/2005 12:15:18 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: baa39

Never did hear the 'rest of the story' on that one. . .and perhaps for the reasons you mention. . .


177 posted on 12/12/2005 4:57:22 AM PST by cricket (No Freedom - No Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: strategofr
"When I board planes, I look around and do a little "reality profiling" checking out who may be friend or foe..... " Are you committing a "nonverbal hate crime"?

I do the same thing. It's called "profiling". I've been "profiling" since November of 2001 on airtravel (and other places...).

It's the only way to fly.

178 posted on 12/12/2005 12:31:43 PM PST by IntheHillsGolden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Would you fly if this nut happened to be on the same flight? :)

Aaaarrrhhhhh hehe

179 posted on 12/12/2005 1:56:04 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead; You Dirty Rats

How did I miss this one???


180 posted on 12/12/2005 2:25:19 PM PST by GoldwaterChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson