1 posted on
12/09/2005 10:01:11 PM PST by
upchuck
To: 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; Abbeville Conservative; acf2906; ...
2 posted on
12/09/2005 10:03:21 PM PST by
upchuck
(Mark Steyn: "...Democratic Party are a bunch of losers because they're all tactics and no strategy.")
To: upchuck
3 posted on
12/09/2005 10:13:18 PM PST by
jwh_Denver
(I'd rather be daytrading.)
To: upchuck
Unbelievable. I know he must be hurting over the loss of his wife but how can he possibly hold Wal-Mart responsible?
4 posted on
12/09/2005 10:15:29 PM PST by
Dustbunny
(Main Stream Media -- Making 'Max Headroom' a reality.)
To: upchuck
"Chris McGoey, a California security consultant, said lawsuits over the safety of store parking lots are common and about 90 percent of them are settled"
Hence this incredibly pointless and malicious lawsuit against Walmart.
What was Walmart, or any business with a parking lot supposed to do to "insure" the safety of potential customers?
Post armed guards?
Provide valet parking?
This man and his lawyer should face criminal charges for including Walmart in a frivolous manner.
Especially the lawyer.
Perhaps there should be a mandatory annual review of all lawyers and immediate revocation of law licenses for those who practice extortion.
6 posted on
12/09/2005 10:17:53 PM PST by
sarasmom
("The French are revolting." Some phrases are true on so many levels, it's mystical!)
To: upchuck
The suit against the jail makes sense, the suit against WalMart does not. There's nothing reasonable a WalMart outlet could have done to prevent something like that. That one's basically like getting hit by lightning.
To: upchuck
14 posted on
12/09/2005 11:52:38 PM PST by
Daaave
(More human, than human®.)
To: upchuck
I thought everything was Bush's fault.
15 posted on
12/10/2005 12:04:26 AM PST by
taxesareforever
(Government is running amuck)
To: upchuck
Husband of woman taken from Wal-Mart sues retailing giant For once something isn't George W. Bush's fault!
16 posted on
12/10/2005 12:15:07 AM PST by
The Duke
To: upchuck
19 posted on
12/10/2005 12:54:05 AM PST by
Thinkin' Gal
(As it was in the days of NO...)
To: upchuck
Kill the lawyer. He's raising my cost of living
23 posted on
12/10/2005 5:39:55 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. ; N.P . Chicken spit causes flu....... Fox News)
To: upchuck
I guess they will need to hire a security agent for every customer that comes onto their lot now. How stupid.
The police patrol the lots here in Summerville and I imagine they do in most cities. If it had been inside the store, maybe this would make sense but because it was outside on common property, no, I don't think so.
Thanks for the ping.
To: upchuck
Follow the money, hungry LAWYER there somewhere.
25 posted on
12/10/2005 5:49:33 AM PST by
cynicom
To: upchuck
Chris McGoey, a California security consultant, said lawsuits over the safety of store parking lots are common and about 90 percent of them are settled.Smells like extortion, doesn't it?
30 posted on
12/10/2005 6:30:07 AM PST by
JoeGar
To: upchuck; All
For the past several years our church has provided a type of security service for the women shopping at our local mall from Thanksgiving to Christmas. When they leave the mall we escort them to their car, carry their packages and even provide an umbrella if it is raining, all for free. We worked all of the mall entrances but were not allowed to work the entrances of individual stores like Belks and Wal-Mart (yes there is a Wal-mart in our mall).
Last year a woman was robbed and raped after leaving Wal-Mart and is suing us because we did not provide the same security for Wal-Mart customers as we did for the rest of the mall. Even though we we were not permitted to work in front of Wal-Mart.
Needless to say, we aren't doing it again this year. This woman suing us because we did not equally protect her, has caused us to pull out, ensuring that all of the women shopping at the mall are equally unprotected.
33 posted on
12/10/2005 6:50:39 AM PST by
Between the Lines
(Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
To: upchuck
Why sue Wal-Mart? Oh, that's right! They have MUCH deeper pockets than his state. *Rolleyes*
37 posted on
12/10/2005 7:06:41 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: upchuck
The "answer" includes:
1. Settle this particular suit
2. Heavy support for laws requiring petitioners who lose a civil suit to pay the other side's court & attorney fees
3. Redesigned Wal*Mart parking lots, with fewer entrances & armed security
38 posted on
12/10/2005 7:09:41 AM PST by
Tax Government
(Support the Ann Coulter Act of 2006. No free speech at colleges ==> no fed funds.)
To: upchuck
One of the WalMarts by me has gotten so bad they have hired rent-a-cops to patrol the parking lot.
It's the corner of Ashley Frustrate and Rivers for those of you in the North Chuck area.
I stick to the Goose Creek WalMart - much safer - better class of people shopping there for the most part.
48 posted on
12/10/2005 9:57:01 AM PST by
Salo
(He hath touched me with his noodly appendage. Ramen.)
To: upchuck
I remember this!
Wasn't this woman related to a Freeper or a Freeper herself?
There were many threads about this from the beginning of her abduction.
To: upchuck
Thanks upchuck for your dead on call of this greedy bastards lawsuit. He has already blown her life insurance money, so he has to milk some from somewhere. How about the Conway police dept., or even all the volunteers who helped searched for Alice, ya sue them please. Or even better, sue Alice's daughter Angie, who didn't realize that her mother was in trouble when she told her that she loved her, then hung up. She said her mother never told her that, so who else should Barry Donovan sue now?
64 posted on
04/01/2006 7:03:10 AM PST by
Westholly
(Swamp sludge Barry)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson