Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is It Treason Yet?
GOP USA ^ | 12-09-05 | Joe Mariani - Commentary

Posted on 12/08/2005 7:56:07 PM PST by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-306 next last
To: smoothsailing
Well, the question is: Is Dean giving aid and comfort to the enemy or not? I think he is and I think an easy 70% of the rest of the Rat party is also, so it's treason. What's really sad, is they aren't committing it out of any inwardly held principles, but just for thier bloodlust for power and to hurt President Bush. Murtha, Dean, and Pelosi et al are despicable excuses for human beings. Now this beg the question if the Rats are aiding, abetting, and giving comfort to our enemies, does this mean the Rats are enemies and a danger to national security?
21 posted on 12/08/2005 8:15:22 PM PST by Wolfhound777 (It's not our job to forgive them. Only God can do that. Our job is to arrange the meeting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns
ROFLMAO!!!!!! That is so funny!

Darn you! Now I won't be able to get to sleep!

22 posted on 12/08/2005 8:18:13 PM PST by EricT. (Caiaphas acted just like a modern Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RocketJsqurl
John F. Kerry is a serial career traitor, having adhered to our enemies from Vietnam to Nicaragua to the terrorist leaders he claims to have met in a New York restaurant, giving them aid and comfort.

Jay Rockefeller recently confessed to treason on national television. He committed the crime by sharing intelligence information with our enemies the Syrians--Baathists like Saddam Hussein--before we ousted the Butcher of Baghdad.

Michael Moore committed treason by cooperating with the Hezbollah terrorist organization, our enemies, giving them aid and comfort in his quest to distribute his libelous sedition (enemy propaganda) film.

Those actions are treason. Here is sedition:

Jack Murtha demands that our troops surrender and praises the enemy. Ted Kennedy wishes our troops to die at the hands of the terrorists. Howard Dean advocates a victory for the terrorists. Sedition is a very serious crime, a felony, but falls short of treason because it does not involve actual "adherence" (contact, visitation, etc.) with the enemy but nevertheless gives aid and comfort through words that rally enemy forces against our troops.
23 posted on 12/08/2005 8:20:35 PM PST by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Wall. Blindfold. Cigarette.


24 posted on 12/08/2005 8:21:10 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

It's been treason by the RATS, MSM and anyone else who has knowingly published or spoke false allegations which the only intent is to harm the national security of the US in the time of war.


25 posted on 12/08/2005 8:21:34 PM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns
LOL! That is fantastic! I've been in sort of a sour mood today and now I can't stop laughing! Thank you sir, you've made my day! ;^)
26 posted on 12/08/2005 8:22:13 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

No blindfold. We'd like to see the whites of their eyes.


27 posted on 12/08/2005 8:22:28 PM PST by writer33 (Rush Limbaugh walks in the footsteps of giants: George Washington, Thomas Paine and Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns
That was good.

Thank you.

I'll be giggling as I drift off to la la land tonight.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.........

LVM

28 posted on 12/08/2005 8:23:51 PM PST by LasVegasMac (HoOked on Fonics. Dun goOd For me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav

"When do we start to take 'action'?"

Right now!

Matt Drudge is reporting this from his website http://drudgereport.com/ :

GOP TO LAUNCH 'WHITE FLAG' DEM ATTACK


EXCLUSIVE: GOP TO LAUNCH 'WHITE FLAG' DEM ATTACK
Thu Dec 08 2005 18:02:44 ET

The DRUDGE REPORT has learned from a top GOP operative that the Republican National Committee will provide state parties with a web video prior to release tomorrow afternoon that shows a white flag waving over images of Democrat leaders making anti-war remarks.

I can't wait.

ROTFLMAO

29 posted on 12/08/2005 8:24:49 PM PST by RebelTex (In loving memory of my mother, her favorite verse - John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Rant: Taken from the text of an American Textbook 2077, "There was, in American, a period of disorder brought on by the constant liberal damage to the family and society. A complete societial breakdown in order occured.... At the height of the liberal takeover of American and her dark days of lawlessness, true patriots rose (aka the insurgency of values) to hunt down the vocal charalotons. As the numbers of those who advocated the abdiction of law and order declined, America was restored and today again leads the free world in both trade and peace."


30 posted on 12/08/2005 8:25:37 PM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I just don't what else to call it anymore.

I do. Partisan politics. If the roles were reversed and say a different international affair, the Republicans would be as ardent against Democratic actions as Democrats are against Republicans now.

31 posted on 12/08/2005 8:25:43 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Tell me why that's not treason.

It may be treason, but it's not prosecutable unless there is war declared under constitutional provision 1-8-11.

32 posted on 12/08/2005 8:26:39 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

HOLY COW! That was AWESOME! ROFL. Made my Thursday! Hell, it made my month.


33 posted on 12/08/2005 8:29:45 PM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
We still have this pesky law that the Democrats routinely violate:

United States Code
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
Section 2388. Activities affecting armed forces during war

(a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; or

Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty, in the military or naval forces of the United States, or willfully obstructs the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service or the United States, or attempts to do so -

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(b) If two or more persons conspire to violate subsection (a) of this section and one or more such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be punished as provided in said subsection (a).

(c) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe or suspect, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under this section, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(d) This section shall apply within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, and on the high seas, as well as within the United States.

How many Democrats, media outlets, "peace" [terrorism] advocates, and other un-Americans are guilty of violating this law? How many have we prosecuted? Why so few?
34 posted on 12/08/2005 8:29:54 PM PST by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wolfhound777
Whether it`s treason or something else, it is stupid and not going to win them any votes. The "cut and run fun bunch" don`t win elections. Never has, and never will. (Check out President McGovern. If it didn`t work then, well...)
But we should be very careful how we use that word, treason. We might not like what the Rats say, they probably are hurting the war effort, I hate them for that, but, they have the right to be stupid but calling them treasonous just makes us sound as nuts as they are.
35 posted on 12/08/2005 8:30:07 PM PST by bybybill (GOD help us if the Rats win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex

Jeez, the party of Lincoln, Roosevelt, and Reagan starting to show manhood?

Christmas has indeed come early.


36 posted on 12/08/2005 8:31:24 PM PST by x1stcav (Murtha is a surrender monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

Bravissimo!


37 posted on 12/08/2005 8:31:30 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (Leftism is Civilizational Masochism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
Check my post #20, I wouldn't want to leave you with the wrong impression. :)
38 posted on 12/08/2005 8:32:18 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

Treason merely requires the existence of enemies of these United States; it does not require a declaration of war. In any case, we already have a declaration of war from Usama himself, and with the tragic attacks on New York City, we cannot argue that he lacks deadly seriousness.


39 posted on 12/08/2005 8:33:04 PM PST by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Did you know cigarette's are bad for the health ? Tofu instead.


40 posted on 12/08/2005 8:33:46 PM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson