Posted on 12/07/2005 8:25:34 PM PST by ncountylee
NEBRASKA CITY, Neb. (AP) -- Speeding is not necessarily reckless, even at 128 mph, a judge ruled in the case of a motorcyclist who tried to flee from state troopers.
With some reluctance, County Judge John Steinheider ruled last week that Jacob H. Carman, 20, was not guilty of reckless driving on Sept. 5, when he was spotted by a trooper who then chased him at the top speed of his cruiser's odometer - 128 mph.
"As much as it pains me to do it, speed and speed alone is not sufficient to establish reckless driving," the judge told Carman on Friday. "If you had had a passenger, there would be no question of conviction. If there had been other cars on the roadway, if you would've went into the wrong lane or anything, I would have convicted you."
Otoe County prosecutor David Partsch acknowledged that Carman could have been charged with speeding but, "We felt that the manner in which he was operating the motorcycle was reckless."
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
But then they decided, naaaaah
Excuse me? What am I missing here? Since when is 128 MPH ANYWHERE, whether there are other vehicles around or not (and if other vehicles appeared, the guy was going too fast to react properly) not reckless, if not downright stupid?
Without any evidence presented other than the high rate of speed, the judge was right. It's nice to see a judge who'll put a strict interpretation of the law above his own personal desire to punish.
I know I'll get flamed for saying so. Just keep in mind that anything you post starting with "what if" is probably other evidence that would, in fact, have made it reckless.
Judge, the grammar police are here to arrest you!
I love a good judge.
Lets hope no law maker screws with this type of justice.
I agree. But I think that opinion will wind up being in the minority on this thread. Hope I'm wrong.
What a piker, I used to hit it from Moorpark to Santa Barbara in my 40 coupe at 150 in 1957 and I sure didn't consisder it reckless.
He'll have a court TV program soon.
The guy should have been charged with speeding. Reckless implies endangerment, which the prosecuter failed to prove.
He's no Harriet Miers!
Interestingly, if you are in the left lane on the Autobahn, and you get rear-ended - you are at fault. You are charged with "obstructing traffic."
A few years back I owned a drove a Drag Boat and raced professionally. I took the Drag Boat to a local river to test some changes I made and the Dept. of Natural Resources Police showed up with a radar gun and a decibel meter, they radar-ed me at 136 MPH and way over the legal noise limits, I was given several tickets, one of which was reckless operation of vessel. I challenged the charges and represented myself in Court. I explained to the Judge that I was a licensed Drag Boat driver by a nationally recognized and sanctioned Drag Boat Racing association and my main argument that was I was not on the river on a suicide mission, nor was I traveling at these speeds near any other boats on the river. The judge agreed and tossed out all of the charges and told the DNR Cop to know the law before issuing citations, and the judge went into great detail about what constitutes "Reckless Driving"
The dude wants to die. 206 km/hr. Well, I agree that the judge made the correct decision. But the driver definitely did not.
The judge doesn't understand that endangering just one's own life, and no other, can nevertheless be reckless. If the guy had just hit one small pebble on the road, he would be dead. His license to ride a motorcycle should be permanently revoked.
Agree. And one never knows who or what is on the road. It the judge's kid was killed, he'd throw the book at that driver, and so would we all.
Odometer?
With all due respect, Torie, the same could be said for a helmet-less rider who might ride up and into a pothole, or hit debris on the road. Nevertheless, it is that person's life, and no one should be able to tell him/her how to live it.
If I chose to build a wooden ladder rather than buy a mandated aluminum or plastic one should I be prevented from painting my house?
If I ever get another Corvette, I want that judge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.