Posted on 12/07/2005 12:26:40 PM PST by Retain Mike
George Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction. I quote, We have known for years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing WMDs. Iraqs search for WMDs has proven impossible to deter and we should assume it will continue as long as Saddam is in power. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that demanded he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. There is unmistakable evidence Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. That is why we must be prepared to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein and eliminate Iraqs WMDs once and for all.
The above quotes compile statements respectively by Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, Henry Waxman, Robert Byrd, Jay Rockefeller, and John Edwards. These quotes concerning WMDs were uncontested points in 2002, which then formed the basis for further discussions. The legend persists instead that these and similar statements were talking points exclusively for George Bush. Contact your newspaper if you are interested in sources. Let us move the debate beyond this mythology.
P.S.
The sources of the quotes are as follows:
Ted Kennedy Sept. 27, 2002; http://kennedy.senate.gov/~kennedy/statements/02/09/2002927718.html
Al Gore Sept. 23, 2002: www.commonwealthclub.org/archive/02/02-09gore-speech.html
Henry Waxman October10, 2002; http://www.house.gov/waxman/news_files/news_statements_res_iraq_10_10_02.htm
Robert Byrd October 3, 2002; http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/archive/2002/byrd100302.htm
Jay Rockefeller October 10, 2002; http://rockefeller.senate.gov/news/2002/flrstmt0102002.html
John Edwards October 10, 2002; http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r107:7:./temp/~r107pqkqkf:e858562:
Other quotes and sources; www.quickrob.com/politics/iraq.quotes.html
If you look it says 2002. The RATS talking point says they were given bad information by the White House. That is theie gripe.
What they should be pointing at is the ABC news story in 1999 about the WMD, The TIME magazine article about Saddams weapons, the Deulfer report, The NY Times, WAPO and LA Times articles and the European intelligence community as well as Clintons bill to overthrow Hussein.
Basically the RATS are trying to rewrite history to say pre 9/11 this never happened.
IBTZ?
ping for later
This is a great article written by someone on the ground who was a inspector with UNSCOM, his name is Bill Tierney.
Read this thoroughly.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20154
also one of our traitorous congress men bragged about warning the enimies before the attack so the sadamites could prepare.
...thus saying their own heros aren't smart enough to make such evaluations on their own.
He is Syria's. . .
and don't call him Shirley.
:-)
Sorry, but on my screen I don't see Busd. I see Bush three times. I need sone help here.
sone Audio pronunciation of "sone" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sn) n. A subjective unit of loudness, as perceived by a person with normal hearing, equal to the loudness of a pure tone having a frequency of 1,000 hertz at 40 decibels.
I don't see "Busd" either. Not sure what I'm not seeing, but I can't figure out why you're getting slammed around a bit. Your links aren't "clickable", but I've had that happen to me too when I've tried to post links.
I am sorry about the "sone", but again I don't see the Busd.
I see a score of seven to one on typos, right?
HAHAHA, nicely done.
BINGO!!
I have been saying this since all this BUSH LIED people DIED crap started in the MSM.
In order for Bush to have lied he would have had to be the ONLY PERSON on the face of the earth TO KNOW THAT SADDAM did NOT have WMD because EVERYONE EVERYWHERE KNEW he had them.
Consequently if BUSH KNEW there were NO WMD he ALSO KNEW he would be CAUGHT when NONE where found and that makes as much sense as Howard Dean and the Dimwit Party.
ping
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.