Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Freedom of Information Act Files Prove FDR Had Foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor?
Independent Institute ^

Posted on 12/07/2005 6:00:02 AM PST by Irontank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
For those who've not read it...I highly recommend Day of Deceit...Robert Stinnett's book on this subject

Day of Deceit

1 posted on 12/07/2005 6:00:04 AM PST by Irontank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Irontank

Can't say that the pre-war intelligence was wrong here.


2 posted on 12/07/2005 6:02:39 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

Of course. And Bush and the Israelis had advance notice of 9/11. /sarc

This is DUmmy Moonbat stuff.


3 posted on 12/07/2005 6:03:43 AM PST by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

What was Halliburton's role in this?


4 posted on 12/07/2005 6:06:33 AM PST by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

-b-


5 posted on 12/07/2005 6:06:53 AM PST by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
After reading intensively on "Magic" and "Purple" I can only surmise that FDR was the stupidest President in history.
6 posted on 12/07/2005 6:07:17 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
Part of the November 25 message read: “…the task force, keeping its movements strictly secret and maintaining close guard against submarines and aircraft, shall advance into Hawaiian waters, and upon the very opening of hostilities shall attack the main force of the United States fleet in Hawaii and deal it a mortal blow…”

Does sound sort of Al Jazeerish, doesn't it?

7 posted on 12/07/2005 6:09:53 AM PST by ErnBatavia (403-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
This is DUmmy Moonbat stuff.

That's what I thought at one time...but Stinnett uncovered some amazing facts that changed my opinion...and its worth noting that Stinnett is of the opinion that FDR was justified in provoking Pearl Harbor

8 posted on 12/07/2005 6:14:37 AM PST by Irontank (Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

You write that in late November 1941 an order was sent out to all US military commanders that stated: “The United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act.” According to Secretary of War Stimson, the order came directly from President Roosevelt. Was FDR’s cabinet on record for supporting this policy of provoking Japan to commit the first overt act of war?


I interpet that to mean: we aren't going to start it but if they do, we better be ready


9 posted on 12/07/2005 6:14:55 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

"Ultimately, General George Marshall, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, persuaded Dewey not to make the speeches. Japan’s naval leaders did not realize America had cracked their codes, and Dewey’s speeches could have sacrificed America’s code-breaking advantage. So, Dewey said nothing, and in November FDR was elected president for the fourth time. "

I question this line of reasoning. The Jappanese were alerted to our code-breaking abilities by a story run in the Chicago Tribune following the Battle of Midway and by a speech made by a Congressman on the floor of the House.

Furthermore, the code used before Pearl was changed shortly after Midway, leading to a blackout of actual decoding prior to the invasion of Guadalcanal. Had the Jappanese been clued in by Dewey's speeches they would have learned that the US could break codes last used in mid 1942. Codes that had been changed multiple times since.


10 posted on 12/07/2005 6:16:55 AM PST by brothers4thID ("Kerry demands that Iraqis terrorize children in the dead of night")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

I just don't know what to think. FDR could have let the Japanese get close enough, then we could have sunk their ships. We could still have declared war on Japan, but not lose as many people as we did by letting them sandbag us.

I really do have to question the timing of this article. It sounds like a disinformation ploy for people to question our role in Iraq.


11 posted on 12/07/2005 6:19:50 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl ("The Less You Have...The More They'll Take"- bf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

There were all kinds of small events that could have changed the future. There were snafus throught out the whole process.

If you think your enemy is going to strike and you act in preperatiion, it doesn't mean you cause it. Japan was going to attack, you can try to influence when.


12 posted on 12/07/2005 6:20:10 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Does sound sort of Al Jazeerish, doesn't it?

This is the money quote for the Moonbat strait jacket tinfoil hat brigade

"Stinnett: That’s right. But you see they wanted the successful overt act by Japan."

To assert that a U.S. President (with the possible exception of Bill Clinton) would do this is certifiably nuts. It would be treason - a willful refusal of the Commander-in-Chief to defend this country against foreign enemies.

13 posted on 12/07/2005 6:20:24 AM PST by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1535158/posts?page=9#9
14 posted on 12/07/2005 6:21:45 AM PST by TheRobb7 (The American Spirit does not require a federal subsidy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

15 posted on 12/07/2005 6:21:52 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
See Post # 13.
16 posted on 12/07/2005 6:22:40 AM PST by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
Our ability to decode intercepted Japanese messages was well less then 100%. But, even if we had the information, what were we supposed to do with it? Tensions between the US and Japan had been building for some time, and the rest of the world was in the middle of a world war. We were already at a high alert and gearing up war-level production of military equipment and personnel. A state of war did not exist.

- Would it be smart to let the Japanese know that we have broken their code, by publishing the exact content of their coded message?
- Should the administration attack the Japanese fleet in international waters, without a declaration of hostilities, without a declaration of war, and strike the first blow?

We did all that could have been done. We warned our bases and continued to prepare. It was Kimmel who failed to appreciate the risk. It was his fault that we were caught with our pants down at Pearl Harbor. He should have appreciated that we had a large number of assets assigned to his command, and he should have used some of them to establish adequate pickets and responses.
17 posted on 12/07/2005 6:24:46 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
Looks like this must be an old article:

One might wonder if the theory that President Franklin Roosevelt had a foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack would have been alluded to in this summer’s movie, Pearl Harbor.

Pearl Harbor was a 2001 movie.

doesn't change the thrust of the article, just the timing. Presumably being post 9/11 it would also explain why this kind of revelation would have been overlooked (besides the normal "protect dems at all cost" media)

18 posted on 12/07/2005 6:26:48 AM PST by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph
a willful refusal of the Commander-in-Chief to defend this country against foreign enemies.

Yes, perhaps you're right, maybe it is treason...........

19 posted on 12/07/2005 6:28:24 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
I've read the book, and can heartily recommend it...

To those who don't really understand how strong the isolationist sentiment was here before the war, ( and parenthetically, to those who decry the level of partisan bitterness in DC today) during the Senate debate on FRD's Lend-Lease bill, Sen Wm Borah (R-Idaho) a leader of the isolationist bloc, in a passionate speech opposing the bill, said that "if it passes...if will drag us into a war in Europe, and plow under every fourth American boy!"

20 posted on 12/07/2005 6:28:42 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson